Avar-Age Polearms and Edged Weapons. Classification, Typology, Chronology and Technology

(Nandana) #1

28 CHAPTER 1


absence of weapons made from organic materials in depositions,155 as some


inorganic elements of armament can be absent either as a result of burial rite,


grave robbery or the social status of the deceased.


The study of Anglo-Saxon weapon burials by Heinrich Härke reformed


the Continental approach combining English and American anthropological


methods with his Continental (German) archaeological education that tra-


ditionally focussed on typochronology and cemetery analyses. He compared


weapon combinations found in burials with physical anthropological features


(like age, physique, disease and injuries) of the deceased in order to reveal


the real nature of weapon deposition in graves.156 In conclusion, Härke also


emphasised the symbolic nature and ideological power of weapon depositions


in burials.157


A different approach examined the social aspects of the location of


burials: great cemetery, church [Kirchengrab] or separate small cemetery


[Separatfriedhof ] for distinguishing elite burials, showing a process of the


formation of nobility (noblemen) in medieval Germany.158 The relationship


of the weapons and belt-costume including its social role was also studied by


Hubert Fehr.159


The above-mentioned works all serve as a methodological basis for research


on the social aspects of weapon depositions in burials. It is important to


emphasise that our knowledge of Avar social structure is very limited as a con-


sequence of the scarcity of written sources, and therefore all such examina-


tions can only provide new information on the funerals of elite individuals and


not on their role in life as it must have been within society.


3 Methods Applied in this Study


3.1 Terminology and the Methods of Classification


A standardised terminology and method is crucial for further examination of


Avar-age close-combat weapons. My intention is therefore to suggest a solu-


tion to the chaotic phrasing and misphrasing of weapons and their parts in


Avar archaeology and to present the specific methods and attributes of my


classification as they have been applied.


155 Capelle 1982, 265–288.
156 Härke 1992.
157 Härke 1997, 119–127.
158 Burzler 2000.
159 Fehr 1999, 105–111.

Free download pdf