The Mongols and the Black Sea Trade in the 13th and 14th Centuries

(lu) #1
the disintegration of the empire 93

Byzantium policy.142 the khan was also geographically better placed than

the sultan to help reconquer Byzantine territory: without mongol con-

sent, if not their active assistance, michael viii would have been unable

to reconquer the cities of the Western Black sea coast from the Bulgarians

in 1262 or 1263, mesembria, anchialos, sozopol and ahtopol,143 and would

have even less been able to reimpose his authority on the islands of the

lower danube,144 which were under immediate golden horde control.145

in the same vein, we must mention Berke and Baybars’ plan to restore

the exiled sultan ‛izz al-dīn Kaikāwuz to his father’s throne in Konya; had

it succeeded, this would have been no less advantageous to the Byzan-

tines, since it would have protected their possessions in asia minor from

foreseeable persian attack.146 the scheme was hatched as part of a far

more ambitious anti-ilkhanid project. to reinthrone ‛izz al-dīn, who had

risen against hülegü, would mean to deprive the ilkhanate of control over

the seljukid sultanate, and bring anatolia into the front which the sultan

and the khan had assembled. such a political reorientation would have

reversed the positions of the warring states, with profound implications

for the commerce in which they engaged: not only would the straits be

entirely removed from hülegü’s sphere of influence, but the ilkhanate’s

access to the Black sea and to the mediterranean would also come under

control of the sarai-cairo axis—with incalculable consequences. the

Jochids and mamluks aimed at a seljuk restoration, which would have

had no chance of success except as part of a general offensive against the

ilkhanate. this, however, was postponed.

By contrast, it was much more pressing for the allies to engage the ser-

vices of a maritime power which could ensure their commercial and dip-

lomatic links. the only power which could fully satisfy these needs was

the genoese, who had many qualities in their favor. in the first instance,

the ligurian republic had the capacity to transport enough slaves from the

golden horde to the insatiable markets of alexandria.147

142 avenarius, “nikaia,” p. 43.
143 pachymeres/Bekker, i, pp. 210–211, Brătianu, Vicina, p. 53, ostrogorsky, Geschichte,
p. 375, todorova, “Black sea,” pp. 229 ff., ciocîltan, “geneza,” p. 92.
144 manuel holobolos/FHDR, iii, pp. 444–455; cf. laurent, “domination,” pp. 189 ff.,
Brătianu, “roumains,” pp. 199–203.
145 in 1253, rubruck considered that the mongols ruled usque ad Danubium (Wyngaert,
Sinica Franciscana, i, p. 167, rubruck/Jackson, pp. 65–66).
146 the failure of this scheme would soon bring a further setback; under pressure from
hülegü, the basileus was obliged to close the link between sarai and cairo.
147 cf. manfroni, Storia; on the weakness of the mamluk fleet, cf. ayalon, “mamluks;”
the golden horde never had any maritime capacity.

Free download pdf