The Mongols and the Black Sea Trade in the 13th and 14th Centuries

(lu) #1
158 chapter four

which di Sambuceto notarised, these furnish a comprehensive picture of

how caffa’s commerce entered a whole new phase.61

the phenomenon is easily explained when seen in the broader Black

Sea-Mediterranean context: it was one effect of the second wave of

Genoese expansion into the Black Sea, after trading conditions in cilician

armenia worsened drastically once the kingdom had become a Mamluk

vassal in 1285.62

the setback in the eastern Mediterranean fed Genoese interest in trade

with the Golden horde and in opening a Black Sea route to the Ilkhan-

ate, with this latter goal becoming increasingly evident after the war to

liberate armenia was lost in 1290. the two processes were closely related,

not just in their actual development and effects, but in perception and

aspiration.

thus Benedetto Zaccaria, mentioned above as trading with caffa in 1286,

was also the admiral who was to attack egypt two years later.63 Because of

this close relationship, the caffans were not slow to help fellow Genoese

threatened by the Mamluk Sultan on the Syrian coast at tripoli.64

It was a frequent complaint at the time that the Genoese were driven

only by the desire for gain, and they paid no heed to political tensions

except, of course, where these affected their material interests. one

example of this attitude was their consistent approach to Black Sea trade,

as though the bitter commercial rivalry between the Golden horde and

the Ilkhanate were not played out in Black Sea waters as well. the same

merchants and sailors could offer their services equally to these two rival

powers. Vivaldo Lavaggio, commanding a galley armed and furnished by

the Ilkhan arghun, captured pirates and returned their booty to the arme-

nians from whom it had been stolen, which earned him a commendation

in caffa in april 1290.65 a month later, pietro di Braina set off from the

same town, bound for the Mongol ruler’s horde at tabriz.66

as such details illustrate, Genoese policy was to deal in as even-handed

a manner as possible with the two rival chinggisid states, and they did not

61 Balard, Romanie, II, p. 852, remarks that the volume of trade increased with the num-
ber of contacts.
62 See chapter 3.2, 3.4.2.
63 See above, pp. 80 ff.
64 Nevertheless, their aid came too late: 1291 (cf. Spuler, Horde, p. 394 note 37, Schmid,
Beziehungen, pp. 138, 139 note 638, papacostea, “Gênes,” p. 223).
65 Brătianu, Actes, pp. 271–272.
66 Ibid., pp. 286–287; although the exact message which he carried is not known, it
must have been a political mission, given the destination and recipient.

Free download pdf