The Mongols and the Black Sea Trade in the 13th and 14th Centuries

(lu) #1
184 chapter four

the city’s port as one of the most famous in the world, able to harbour

two hundred ships.160

as well as its concern to promote caffa directly, the office also pursued

the same objective by the indirect means of appeasing or neutralising

adversaries. the merchants republic’s chosen weapon was the commercial

boycott, used against declared enemies or potential rivals in the crimea

(Soldaia and Solkhat), on the coast of asia Minor (Sinope) and on the

North-West Black Sea coast (the Bulgaria of theodore Svetoslav).161 the

conflict with trebizond is an exceptional case here, both for the prize that

was fought over and the course of hostilities.162

Özbek’s grant provided not just the basis on which caffa was physically

built, but the legal framework. for all the disadvantages that an unwritten

agreement may offer from the point of view of rigour, it provided a legal

space within which the colonial possession could be planted. although its

status was hardly clear, due to the deficiency just mentioned and other

elements which suggested an equivocal status, the government of caffa

verbally built on the khan’s words in 1313 in practice removed the town

from Golden horde jurisdiction.

the powers with which the office of Gazaria invested the consul leave

no doubt that he, together with his councillors, was the real governor at

the local level and exercised his power in the name of the republic.163 the

consul’s position becomes especially clear when compared with Özbek’s

supposed representatives in the town, whom the documentation of his

reign passes over in silence. these are the Mongol customs agents, such as

were recorded in caffa in 1289–90,164 who in 1380 drew 3% of commercium

for the khan’s use.165 this subsequent mention in the sources is specified

with the phrase segundo le premere usanse, so that it becomes obvious that

the officers were carrying out their duties even in 1313. their presence in

a place that enjoyed functional autonomy, tacitly recognised by the ruler

on the Volga, does not throw any doubt on the basic problem.166 their

presence was also balanced out—to a varying but measurable extent—by

a corresponding Genoese agency, founded within the office of Gazaria in

160 Ibn Baṭṭūṭa/Defrémery, Sanguinetti, II, p. 358.
161 Sauli, “Imposicio,” columns 379–380, 382, 385, forcheri, Navi, p. 23.
162 cf. Karpov, Impero, pp. 146–149, and chapter 3.4.2.
163 Sauli, “Imposicio,” columns 387 ff., forcheri, Navi, p. 23.
164 Balard, Romanie, I, pp. 459 ff.
165 Sacy, “pièces,” p. 54, Balard, Romanie, I, p. 459, pegolotti/evans, p. 26, ciocîltan,
“restauraţia,” pp. 579–590.
166 the Mongol customs officers taxed all trade that passed through.

Free download pdf