The Pursuit of Power. Technology, Armed Force, and Society since A.D. 1000

(Brent) #1
The Business of War in Europe, 1000–1600 89

Guns of this radically new design accompanied the French army that
invaded Italy in 1494 to make good Charles VIII’s claim to the throne
of Naples. The Italians were overawed by the efficiency of the new
weapons. First Florence and then the pope yielded after only token
resistance; and on the single occasion when a fortress on the border of
the kingdom of Naples did try to resist the invaders, the French
gunners required only eight hours to reduce its wails to rubble. Yet
not long before, this same fortress had made itself famous by with­
standing a siege of seven years.^22
The clumsy bombards of 1453 had already altered the balance be­
tween besieger and besieged, but the resulting disturbance to estab­
lished power relationships was enormously magnified by the French
and Burgundian invention of mobile siege guns between 1465 and


  1. Wherever the new artillery appeared, existing fortifications be­
    came useless. The power of any ruler who was able to afford the high
    cos't of the new weapons was therefore enhanced at the expense of
    neighbors and subjects who were unable to avail themselves of the
    new technology of war.
    In Europe, the major effect of the new weaponry was to dwarf the
    Italian city-states and to reduce other small sovereignties to triviality.
    The French and Burgundians did not long retain a monopoly, of
    course; nearby territorial monarchs quickly acquired siege guns of the
    new design, including the Hapsburg emperors and the Ottoman sul­
    tans.^23 A mighty struggle among the newly consolidated powers of
    Europe ensued, lasting through most of the sixteenth century and re­
    ducing the Italian city-states to the condition of pawns to be fought
    over.
    Yet the ingenuity that made Italian skills the cynosure of all who
    encountered them was not baffled for long by the heightened power
    of siege guns. As a matter of fact, even before encountering the for­
    midable new French guns in 1494, Italian military engineers had been
    most incisive account of early development of artillery in Europe that I have seen. In the
    nineteenth century, detailed and more or less antiquarian writing on artillery achieved
    striking refinement with such works as A. Essenwein, Quellen zur Geschichte der Feuer­
    waffen. 2 vols. (Leipzig, 1877; republished in facsimile, Graz, 1969). On the Burgun­
    dian development of artillery, cf. C. Brusten, L'armée bourguignonne de 1455 à 1468
    (Brussels, 1954); Claude Gaier, L’industrie et le commerce des armes dans l’anciennes prin­
    cipautés belges du XIIIe à la fin du XVe siècle (Paris, 1973).

  2. Christopher Duffy, Siege Warfare: The Fortress in the Early Modern World, 1494–
    1660 (London, 1979), pp. 8–9.

  3. The Hapsburgs shared the Burgundian inheritance with the French in 1477 and
    thus fell heir directly to the gunfounding capabilities of the Low Countries. For the
    Ottomans cf. John F. Guilmartin, Jr., Gunpowder and Galleys: Changing Technology and
    Mediterranean Warfare at Sea in the 16th century (Cambridge, 1974), pp. 255–56.

Free download pdf