India\'s Israel Policy - P. R. Kumaraswamy

(vip2019) #1

  1. recognition without relations 295


3 9. Jerusalem Post (September 18, 1950).



  1. Even if the new state was recognized, as von Glahn, Law Among Nations,
    95– 96, observed, such recognition “automatically involves recognition of
    the Government of that State, for no one could envision recognition of the
    whole unit without inclusion of its operating agency, its government.”

  2. Parakatil, India and the United Nations Peace Keeping Operations, 75. The
    timing of such an interpretation was signifi cant, as the mid- 1970s wit-
    nessed the height of Israel’s international isolation.

  3. Misra, India’s Policy of Recognition, 192. The September 1950 statement was
    silent on the legal status.

  4. Mehrish, India’s Recognition Policy, 80.
    4 4. Debates LS, series VI, vol. 6 (July 26, 1971), 116.

  5. Walter Eytan’s “New Delhi Diary,” ISA, 2383/21.

  6. India’s recognition of the state of Palestine is a notable exception. But this
    should be seen in the context of traditional Indian support for the Palestin-
    ian cause and its recognition of the Palestine Liberation Or ga ni za tion (PLO)
    in 1975 as “the sole and legitimate representative” of the Palestinians.

  7. E. Elath to M. Sharett (October 14, 1949), Israel Documents, 4:548.

  8. Walter Eytan to Abba Eban (November 21, 1949), Israel Documents, 4:637.

  9. Gopal, Jawaharlal Nehru, 2:169. Emphasis added.

  10. Nehru’s letter dated October 1, 1950. Nehru, Letters to Chief Ministers, 2:217.
    Emphasis added.

  11. Offi cial translation of ambassador’s interview, which appeared in the Sep-
    tember 21, 1950, issue of Al Misri (Cairo). NAI, F.22 (25)- AWT/50.

  12. Israel signed the armistice agreements with Egypt (February 24, 1949),
    Lebanon (March 23, 1949), Jordan (April 3, 1949), and Syria (July 20, 1949),
    while Iraq and Saudi Arabia expressed their support for any Arab- Israeli
    armistice agreement.

  13. This note of February 27, 1950, was prepared by the Ministry of External
    Aff airs, anticipating supplementary questions on Israel in parliament. NAI,
    F.23 (2)- AW T/50.

  14. Mehrish, India’s Recognition Policy, 106– 107.

  15. India’s refusal to endorse a separate Tamil homeland in Sri Lanka has in-
    hibited the Tamil militant groups, especially the Liberation Tigers of Tamil
    Eelam (LTTE), from pursuing the option of a Unilateral Declaration of In de-
    pen dence (UDI).

  16. Such conditions were absent in the case of the APG declared on September
    22, 1948. Hence, despite supporting the Arabs in the past, India did not
    consider its request for recognition.

  17. Bialer, “The Ira ni an Connections in Israel’s Foreign Policy, 1948– 1951.”

  18. On March 29, 1949.

  19. On January 12, 1950, Israel recognized Indonesia, and in response Indone-
    sian Prime Minister and Foreign Minister Muhammad Hatta sent a for-
    mal note to Moshe Sharett thanking him for the recognition. Israel Docu-
    ments, 5:95. It is, however, very doubtful that this act alone constitutes

Free download pdf