India\'s Israel Policy - P. R. Kumaraswamy

(vip2019) #1
320 12. normalization and after


  1. The most se nior career diplomat in the Ministry of Foreign Aff airs and the
    equivalent of the permanent undersecretary in the U.S. State Department.

  2. J. N. Dixit’s interview to The Week (February 9, 1992): 37.

  3. For example, during the June 1967 war, some opposition members of parlia-
    ment cried that India was acting like “the fourteenth Arab state.”

  4. Pradhan, “India’s Policy Towards the PLO,” 69.

  5. Shukla, “Talking Too Much,” 40.

  6. Pradhan, “India’s Policy Towards the PLO,” 73. See also Dasgupta, “Betrayal
    of India’s Israel Policy.”

  7. He was referring to the INC meeting in the southern city of Tirupati in
    April 1992. Aiyar, “Chutzpah.” See also Rubinoff , “Normalization of India-
    Israel relations.”

  8. Aiyar, “Panchayati Raj in the Gaza Strip.” See also Aiyar, “The Moral
    Dimension.”

  9. Agwani, “Inaugural Remarks,” 3.

  10. Dixit, My South Block Years, 311. Interestingly, Arjun Singh subsequently
    became one of the se nior Indian leaders to make an offi cial visit to Israel.

  11. Pasha, India and OIC, 52– 53.

  12. Pradhan, “India’s Policy Towards the PLO,” 81.

  13. “Diplomatic Ties with Israel,” Statesman (New Delhi) (January 31, 1992).

  14. Days after the Iraqi invasion, India closed its embassy in Kuwait.

  15. Pasha, India and OIC, 42. Emphasis added. This is a typical Indian euphe-
    mism; at home refers to Indian Muslims and abroad denotes Arabs.

  16. Agwani, Contemporary West Asia, 253– 254.

  17. The absence of relations with Israel since June 1967 prevented the Soviet
    Union from mediating in the Arab- Israeli confl ict.

  18. For example, see Dasgupta, “Betrayal of India’s Israel Policy,” 767– 772.

  19. At Khartoum, the Arab League enunciated a policy of “no recognition, no
    negotiation, and no peace” with Israel.

  20. Conscious of the Middle Eastern predicaments, India often expressed its
    willingness to mediate “should both parties so desire.”

  21. Subsequently, domestic compulsions, especially pressures from the left, re-
    sulted in India becoming less vocal regarding civilian deaths in Israel.
    Hence on July 31, 2006, the Lok Sabha unanimously adopted a partisan
    resolution on the Lebanese crisis. See http:// meaindia .nic .in/ pressrelease/
    2006/ 07/ 31pr02 .htm.

  22. Interestingly, the position was articulated by the communist leader Sitaram
    Yechuri, who was part of the offi cial delegation to the UN General Assem-
    bly. See “Concern Over Israeli Violations of Palestinian Rights,” People’s
    Democracy (November 20, 2005).

  23. In the wake of the publication of the MacDonald White Paper in 1939 that
    distanced the British government from the Balfour Declaration, the yishuv
    leadership evolved a policy in Mandate Palestine that could be summarized
    as follows: “To fi ght the War as if there is no White Paper and to fi ght the
    White Paper as if there is no War.”

Free download pdf