The Spread of Buddhism

(Rick Simeone) #1
16 bart dessein

century after the Buddha’s parinirva, the Mahsghikas split into
the Ekavyavahrikas, the Lokottaravdins, the Bahurutyas, the
Kukkuikas, and the Prajñaptivdins. Epigraphical evidence reveals
that the Ekavyavahrikas and the Lokottaravdins moved into present-
day Afghanistan, and that at least some of the Bahurutyas resided
in present-day Pakistan.^4 The Prajñaptivdins moved to the Hmlaya
mountains. The place of residence of the Kukkuikas is unclear. After
Mathur had been the Mahsghika stronghold in the second half of
the  rst century BC,^5 the school also spread to the south of the Indian
subcontinent, more precisely to the K
 valley region. Epigraphic
evidence of the presence of the Mahsghikas and their different sub-
schools in the K
 valley region, dates back to the second and third
centuries AD.^6 This means that, at the time of the compilation of the
Vaibh
ika *Abhidharmamahvibhstra, our major Abhidharma source
of information on the Sarvstivda and Mahsghika controversy
under scrutiny here, the Mahsghikas had become an important
Buddhist group also in the south.


  1. Treatment of the Subject in STRAand VINAYA Literature


To answer the question on which premises the discussion on the nature
of the wheel of the doctrine and its  rst turning may have arisen, we
need to investigate the different accounts of the  rst turning of the
wheel of the doctrine in the S tra and Vinaya literature. As the Vinaya
literature contains the most complete accounts, we start with discussing
the Vinaya literature.
The  rst sermon of the Buddha is narrated in the Pli Vinaya,
the Mahsakavinaya «Mishasai bu hexi wufen lü» (T.1421), and the
Dharmaguptakavinaya «Sifen lü» (T.1428).^7 All three accounts start with

Dessein, “Of Tempted Arhats and Supermundane Buddhas: Abhidharma in the K   

Region”, in: Anthony Barber & Sri Padma Holt (eds.). Buddhism in the K River Valley
of Andhra 4. State University of New York Press (forthcoming).
See Kieffer-Pülz 2000, pp. 293–294.

(^5) Lamotte 1958, p. 580. See also Shizutani 1965.
(^6) See Epigraphia Indica XX, pp. 15–17, 17, 19–20, 21–22, 24; Epigraphia Indica XXI,
pp. 61–62; Epigraphia Indica XXIV, pp. 256–260; Epigraphia Indica XXVII, pp. 1–4;
Lüders 1973, nos. 1223, 1230, 1244, 1248, 1250, 1263, 1272, 1270; Sivaramamurti
1942, p. 278. See further also Lamotte 1958, p. 580. 7
Pli Vinaya, Mahvagga I.6.18–29 (Oldenberg 1964, pp. 10–11; Rhys Davids &
Heirman_f3a_15-48.indd 16 3/13/2007 11:21:14 AM

Free download pdf