Preface
ix
Preparing a historical dictionary on U.S. intelligence is a formidable
task, for two reasons. First, the subject matter is not what it seems:
while the United States has had some kind of intelligence capability
throughout its history, its intelligence apparatus is young, dating only to
the period immediately after World War II. Yet, in that short a time, it
has undergone enormous changes—from the labor-intensive espionage
and covert action establishment of the 1950s to an enterprise that today
relies heavily on technologically advanced information pathways and
seriously expensive gadgets like satellites, airborne collection plat-
forms, and unmanned aerial vehicles.
Second, writing about intelligence matters invariably is fraught with
difficulties, not the least of which is the secrecy surrounding intelligence
activities. Secrecy is a bulwark of any intelligence service, and this is no
different for U.S. intelligence. Therefore, some of what could be known
about U.S. intelligence and its activities simply is shrouded in the mists
of classification schemes and is unavailable to the public. However, the
United States is one of the few countries on the globe that allows dis-
cussion and debate, albeit sometimes grudgingly, about its intelligence
agencies and their activities. As a result, a surprisingly large number of
authors, both from inside and outside the U.S. intelligence community,
have written about U.S. intelligence in all its guises. This burgeoning lit-
erature makes virtually all facets of the American intelligence enterprise
readily available to the public. The richness of this literature is evident
in the fact that, even though the author is a former intelligence officer,
everything in this dictionary came from publicly available materials.
There is a third complication in writing historically about intelligence—
that of coming to terms with the myriad conceptions of intelligence. Ap-
preciating the history of U.S. intelligence requires an understanding of in-
telligence as an essential governmental activity. The public understandably
05-398 (1) FM.qxd 10/20/05 6:13 AM Page ix