Before the Bobbies. The Night Watch and Police Reform in Metropolitan London, 1720-1830

(Jacob Rumans) #1
174 Notes


  1. N. Rogers, 'Confronting the Crime Wave: The Debate over Social Reform and
    Regulation, 1749-1753', in Stilling the Grumbling Hive, ed. L. Davison, et al.,
    p. 81; see also Beattie, Crime and the Courts, p. 520.

  2. Quoted in Radzinowicz, History, vol. I, p. 415.

  3. Beattie, Crime and the Courts, pp. 202-5.

  4. Annual Register, 1772, pp. 144-5.

  5. Beattie, Crime and the Courts, pp. 207-8, 235. For population increase, see E.A.
    Wrigley and R.S. Schofield, The Population History of Engkmd, 1541-1871
    (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1981), pp. 166-74, 265-9. For inter-
    nal migration, see E.A Wrigley, 'A Simple Model of London's Importance in
    Changing English Society and Economy 1650-1750', Past and Present 37 (1967),
    pp. 44-70.

  6. Rogers, 'Confronting the Crime Wave,' pp. 78-81.

  7. P. King, 'Newspaper Reporting, Prosecution Practice and Perceptions of Urban
    Crime: the Colchester Crime Wave of 1765', Continuity and Change 2 (3), 1987,
    pp. 423-54.

  8. The standard work on Wilkes and his supporters is G. Rude, Wilkes and Liberty
    (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1962). See also I.R. Christie, Wilkes, wyv;ll
    and Reform (Macmillan, 1962); and J. Brewer, Party Ideology and Popular
    Politics at the Accession of George 111 (Cambridge: Cambridge University
    Press, 1976) and his 'The Wilkites and the Law, 1763-74: A Study of Radical
    Notions of Governance', in J. Brewer and J. Styles (eds), An Ungovernable
    People: the English and their Law in the Seventeenth and Eighteenth Centuries
    (New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press, 1980), pp. 85-171; and I.
    Gilmour, &ot, Risings, and Revolution: Governance and Vwlence in 18th Century
    England (Hutchinson, 1992), Chap. 15.

  9. See Brewer, 'The Wilkites and the Law', p. 164.

  10. A good summary of these events is in Rude, Hanoverian London, pp. 191-201.

  11. G. Rude, The Crowd in History 1730-1848, revised ed. (Lawrence and Wishart,
    1981), p. 66.

  12. N. Rogers, 'Aristocratic Clientage, 'Il'ade and Independency: Popular Politics in
    Pre-Radical Westminster', Past and Present 61 (1973), p. 105 and by the same
    author, JWJigs and Cities.

  13. Rude, The Crowd in History, pp. 59-61. This contrasts to an earlier view of the
    mob as the dregs of society.

  14. See, for example, C. Reith, The Police Idea: Its History and Evolution in England
    in the Eighteenth Century and After (Oxford University Press, 1938), p. 43.

  15. The Riot Act (1 Geo. I c.5) made it a capital offence for any 12 or more people to
    remain together if they did not disperse within one hour, once the act was read
    out loud. Radzinowicz, History, vol. III, pp. 22-3. See also Sharpe, Crime in Early
    Modem England, p.28 and Brewer, 'The Wilkites and the Law,' pp. 164-6.

  16. See, for example, W. Cobbett and T.C. Hansard (eds), Parliamentary History of
    England, vol. XVII, cols. 228-9, when the House of Commons enquired into
    'the Riots and Thmults in the Avenues leading to the House' on 25 March

  17. The officials who testified were either magistrates or constables, with the
    most pointed questions about crowd control being addressed to the magis-
    trates. Hereafter cited as ParL Hist.

  18. Rude, Wilkes and Liberty; E.P. Thompson, 'The Moral Economy of the English
    Crowd in the Eighteenth Century', Past and Present 70 (1971), pp. 76-136; and
    J. Bohstedt, 'The Moral Economy and the Discipline of Historical Context',
    Journal of Social History 26 (1992), pp. 265-84.

  19. Quoted in Gilmour, &ot, Risings and Revolution, p.70.

Free download pdf