NOTES TO CHAPTER 19 1125CHAPTER 19. The Community Compact Systcm (HyanRmk)
I. PGSR T I b. The reference is to the "Ta Ssu-t'u" section of the Chou·li. and the num-
bers of households come from Cheng Hslian's commentary.
- Ibid. 8: I a; Ajia rekishi jiten (Tokyo: Heibonsha, 1962) 2:305-0.
- PGSR T2b-3a; Wada Sei, ChUgoku chihO jiji hattatsushi [History of the develop-
ment of local self-government in China] (Tokyo: Kyuko shoin, 1975), pp. 6-8.
4· PGSR 7:3a-b. - Ibid. T3b-4b.
- The issues involved in the Sung pao-chia system are too complex to investigate
here, but it is likely that Yu refrained from praising any policy supported by Wang unless
he was overwhelmed by its obvious utility. See Higashi !chio, 6 Anseki simpo no kenA.,)·iJ
[A study ofthe new laws of Wang An-shih] (Tokyo: Kazama shobo, 1970), pp. 742-811. - Yu's version of the text was probably based on Chu Hsi's collected works (Chu wen-
kung well-chi). the most reliable text, but with some erroneous emendations included in
the Hsil1R-1i ta-eh 'iiall. See "Chu-tzu tseng-sun Lli-shih hsiang-yueh," PGSR II :3b-4Ia;
"Chu-tzu Chang-chou pang-yli," ibid. II :28a-3 rb; Tabana Tameo, Chrism kyoyaku
kyokashi no kenkYlj I A study of the history of the community compact as moral educa-
tion in Chosonl (Tokyo: Ch0h0sha, 1972), pp. 1-13; Kung-chuan Hsiao. Rural China:
Imperial Control in the Nineteenth Century (Seattle: University of Washington Press,
1960; paperback ed., 1967), pp. 201-2. - Tagawa Kozo, "Rieho no kyokyu ni tsuite" [Local regulations in the Yi dynasty l.
part I, ChOsen gakuh076 (July 1975):35-72; part 2, ibid. 78 (January 1976):45-88; part - ibid. (October 1976):179-210.
- Yi T'aejin, "Sarimp'a iii Yuhyangso pongnip undong" [The movement by the sarim
group to restore the Yuhyangso l. in Han 'guk sahoesa y/JI7 'gu: !long lip kisul pal tal kwa
sahoe PY()lldong I Studies in the social history of Korea: The development of agricultural
technology and social change] (Seoul: Chisik san'opsa, 1986), pp. 125-30. Published
originally in Hall 'guk munhwa 4 (December 1983): 1-38. Tagawa, "Rich0 no kyokyu,"
pt. I, p. 40. Kim Yongd6k, Hmngch ollg yon 'gu [Studies of the local self-government
office] (Seoul: Han'guk y<'lll'guwon, 1978), pp. 16-21.
Yi T'aejin has accepted Yi Kukpae's account and rejected the statement made by the
royal secretary, Song Chun, in 1482 that Scjo abolished the Yuhyangso at the time of Yi
Siae's rebellion in the northeast because he had been told that men of official rank (p 'umg-
wan) ill the local Yuhyangso had joined in the rebellion. King Songjong expressed doubt
about this reason and asked his officials to check the record the Sejojo Ugi [Diary of Sejo's
reign], a text no longer extant, and then he dropped consideration about restoring the
Yuhyangso. Yi could not find any notice ill 1467 about any aholition of the Yuhyangso
in that year. but given S<'lng Chun's attempts as governor of Hamgil Province after that
time to use his authority as a high official to win over as many local gentry as he could,
he might have been trying to prevent the resurgence of the gentry by the restoration of
the Yuhyangso to prcscne his own political control of the Ha1llgil literati. Yi T'aejin,
"Sarimp'a iJi Yuhyangso," pp. 157, 181-82. - Yi T'aejin, "Sarimp'a iJi Yuhyangso," pp. 136-49. Kim Ch'om, for example. con-