The Sumerian World (Routledge Worlds)

(Sean Pound) #1
NOTE

1 Although Sargon is named the mut“husband” of Inanna in an inscription, anomalies in the
Akkadian period indicate a significant deviation from earlier religious practice, possibly because
Akkadian monarchs were often absent from southern Mesopotamia or because they disdained
Sumerian conventions. A tendency toward the latter is elsewhere indicated by the paucity of
priestly titles and allusions to providing for the welfare of the land in royal Akkadian inscriptions.
In common with the Ur plaque, the libator on the Disk of Enheduanna is naked. The closest
figure to the libator, rendered in profile, is identified as Enheduanna on the basis of costume and
an inscription. Size-rank hierarchy and centrality position Enheduanna as the dominant figure
(Winter 1987 b: 921 – 293 ) in contrast to the similarly garbed priestess on the Ur plaque (Figure
11. 2 ), who is depicted frontally and who is smaller than the libator. If the naked libator on the
Disk of Enheduanna is Sargon, it is odd for his daughter to be portrayed in the more important
position, even on a self-commissioned artifact. These anomalies suggest that Enheduanna differs
in some fundamental respect from her predecessors, possibly further implying that someone other
than the ruler performed the Sacred Marriage ceremony during her tenure. A libation of this type
on an unprovenanced seal (Orthmann 1975 : pl. 135 H), dated to the Akkadian period on stylistic
criteria, depicts a female libator in conventional feminine dress before a seated armed Inanna.
In common with the Disk of Enheduanna, the biconical vase on Seal 135 H lacks a palm, but the
libator’s headdress, fringed robe, and pourer resemble Neo-Sumerian exemplars. We have no
information as to her identity, but the evidence suggests an unknown female monarch or further
indication that the Sacred Marriage was delegated to someone other than the ruler in the
Akkadian period.


REFERENCES

Abusch, T. 2000. Ishtar. NIN, Journal for Gender Studies in Antiquity 1 : 23 – 27.
al-Jadir, W. and Werr, L. al-Gailani. 1994. “A ‘Steatite’ Stone Cup from Sippar.” In Cinquante-deux
Reflexions sur le Proche-Orient Ancien offertes en hommage à Léon De Meyer, Gasche, H., Tanret,
M., Janssen, C., et al., eds. Mesopotamian History and Environment Occasional Publications
II. Ghent, Belgium: Peeters, 175 – 180.
Aruz, J. and Wallenfels, R. (eds.) 2003. Art of the First Cities: The Third Millennium BCfrom the
Mediterranean to the Indus. New York: Metropolitan Museum of Art.
Bahrani, Z. 2002. Performativity and the Image: Narrative, Representation, and the Uruk Vase. In
Leaving No Stones Unturned: Essays on the Ancient Near East and Egypt in honor of Donald P.
Hansen, Ehrenberg, E., ed. Winona Lake, Indiana: Eisenbrauns, 15 – 22.
Berlin, A. 1981. “Enmerkar and Ensuhkesˇdanna: A Sumerian Narrative Poem.” Bibliotheca Orientalis
38 : 338 – 343.
Bidmead, J. 2002. The Akı ̄tu Festival: Religious Continuity and Royal Legitimation in Mesopotamia.
Gorgias Dissertations Near Eastern Studies 2. Piscataway, NJ: Gorgias Press.
Boehmer, R. M. 1999. Uruk: Früheste Siegelabrollungen. Ausgrabungen in Uruk-Warka Endberichte
24. Mainz am Rhein: Verlag Philipp von Zabern.
Börker-Klähn, J. 1975. Sˇulgi badet. Zeitschrift für Assyriologie 64 : 235 – 240.
Brisch, N. M. (ed.) 2008. Religion and Power: Divine Kingship in the Ancient World and Beyond.
Oriental Institute Seminars 4. Chicago: Oriental Institute.
Civil, M. 1964. A Hymn to the Beer Goddess. In Studies Presented to A. Leo Oppenheim June 7 , 1964
from the Workshop of the Chicago Assyrian Dictionary, Biggs, R. and Brinkman, J.A., eds. Chicago:
University of Chicago Press, 67 – 89.
Cohen, M. E. 1993. The Cultic Calendars of the Ancient Near East. Bethesda, MD: CDL Press.
Cohen, S. 1973. Enmerkar and the Lord of Aratta. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Pennsylvania.
Philadelphia, PA.


–– Kathleen McCaffrey ––
Free download pdf