854 { Notes to pages 759–770
Chapter 28. China’s Quest for Modernity and the Tides of World History- The name “Wilhelmine” derives from the fact that two of the three emperors of
that period were named Wilhelm. The third, Friedrich, ruled for less than a year. - F. L. Carsten, The Origins of Prussia, Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1954.
- Hendrick Spruyt, The Sovereign State and Its Competitors: An Analysis of Systems
Change, Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1994. - Richard J. Evans, “Introduction: Wilhelm II’s Germany and the Historians,” in
Society and Politics in Wilhelmine Germany, New York: Barnes and Noble, 1978, pp. 11–23. - See Gordon A. Craig, The Politics of the Prussian Army, 1640–1945, London: Oxford
University Press, 1975. - David Shambaugh, Modernizing China’s Military, Berkeley: University of
California Press, 2002. - Modern History Sourcebook: Tables Illustrating the Spread of Industrialization,
Fordham University, available at http://legacy.fordham.edu/halsall/mod/indrevtabs1.asp
. The American share in 1913 was 35.8 percent of world total manufacturing. - For an overview of Bismarck’s diplomacy and its abandonment by Wilhelm II, see
Henry Kissinger, Diplomacy, New York: Simon & Schuster, 1994, pp. 137–200. - Imanuel Geiss, German Foreign Policy, 1871–1914, New York: Routledge and Kegan
Paul, 1976, p. 78. See also, Eckart Kehr, Economic Interest, Militarism and Foreign Policy,
Berkeley: University of California Press, 1977. - Quoted in Geiss, German Foreign Policy. This interpretation of World War I as the
result of a deliberate German decision to break out of encirclement and achieve domi-
nation on the continent of Europe entailed rebuttal of an earlier thesis that saw the war
as essentially an accident, resulting from mobilization schedules and alliances. See Fritz
Fischer, Germany’s Aims in the First World War, New York: Norton, 1967. Fisher’s thesis
has been challenged by much subsequent scholarship and is now often considered too
simplistic. My own view is that while any phenomenon is more complex that any schol-
arly framework can grasp, Fisher nonetheless identified an important process. - Peter H. Gries, “Nationalism and Chinese Foreign Policy,” in China Rising, edited
by Yong Deng and Fei-ling Wang, New York: Rowman and Littlefield, 2005, pp. 103–15. - Christopher H. Hughes, “Japan in the Politics of Chinese Leadership
Legitimacy: Recent Developments in Historical Perspective,” Japan Forum, vol. 20, no. 2
(2008), pp. 245–66. - Susheng Zhao, “Chinese Intellectual’s Quest for National Greatness and National-
istic Writing in the 1990s,” China Quarterly, no. 152 (December 1997), pp. 725–45. - Kenneth Lieberthal and Wang Jisi, Addressing U.S.-China Strategic Distrust, John
L. Thornton China Center Monograph Series, Number 4, Washington, DC: Brookings
Institution, March 2002. This overview is drawn from Wang Jisi’s presentation on
pages 7–19. - Lieberthal and Wang, Addressing, p. 11.
- This section draws on Andrew J. Nathan and Andrew Scobell, “How China Sees
America; the Sum of Beijing’s Fears,” Foreign Affairs, vol. 91, no. 5 (September/October
2012), pp. 32–47. - Robert Zoellick, “Whither China: From Membership to Responsibility,” September
21, 2005, available at http://www.2001-2009.state.gov/s/d/former/zoellick/rem/53682.htm.