War, Peace, and International Relations. An Introduction to Strategic History

(John Hannent) #1

Questions



  1. What is the difference between war and warfare, and why does it matter?

  2. Can the contexts of strategic history be rank-ordered in importance?

  3. Is it persuasive to argue that Thucydides said all that needs to be said at a
    general level when he identified ‘fear, honour and interest’ as the principal
    motives for war?

  4. What factors can inhibit dialogue between politicians and soldiers?


Further reading


J. Black Warfare in the Western World, 1882–1975(Chesham: Acumen, 2002).
—— Introduction to Global Military History: 1775 to the Present Day(London: Routledge,
2005).
B. Bond The Pursuit of Victory: From Napoleon to Saddam Hussein(Oxford: Oxford University
Press, 1996).
P. Browning The Changing Nature of Warfare: The Development of Land Warfare from 1792 to
1945 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002).
P. Hirst War and Power in the 21st Century: The State, Military Conflict and the International
System(Cambridge: Polity Press, 2001).
J. S. Nye, Jr Understanding International Conflicts: An Introduction to Theory and History, 6th
edn (New York: Pearson Longman, 2007).
C. Townshend (ed.) The Oxford History of Modern War(Oxford: Oxford University Press,
2005).
J. J. Weltman World Politics and the Evolution of War(Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University
Press, 1995).


14 War, peace and international relations


warfare; the relationship between politicians and soldiers; the dependence of
war on society; and the relations between war and peace, and peace and war.


  1. The principal contexts of strategic history are: political; socio-cultural; eco-
    nomic; technological; military–strategic; geographical; and historical. These
    contexts are always in play.

  2. ‘Fear, honour and interest’ provide historical continuity of motivation for
    conflict and war.

  3. Because war is waged for political goals, there needs to be a continuous
    dialogue between politicians and soldiers, albeit a dialogue weighted in favour
    of the former.

  4. To be good at waging warfare is not necessarily to be competent at the conduct
    of war.

  5. Societies and people with their values and beliefs make war, not just states.

Free download pdf