138 Elizabeth Deligio
violence in acts of memory and together affirm, mourn and seek meaning.
The movement from individual memories (survivors of police violence) to
collective memory (city of Chicago) begins to form the common alliance
that Herman (1997) calls for and prevents erasure and forgetting.
In conclusion, the three-phase model of memory while containing
important information about memory it needs to be put into dialog with
other models of memory. Delineating what happens on a physiological
level will always be important, but it loses functionality when it is isolated
from other sites of knowledge failing to “draw the world together.”
REFERENCES
American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistic manual
of mental disorders (5th ed.). Washington, DC: APA.
Casey, E. (1987). Remembering a phenomenological study (2nd ed.).
Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
Centro Nacional de Memoria [National Center for Historical Memory] &
University of British Colombia. (2013). Remembering and narrating
conflict: Resources for historical memory work. Bogota, Colombia:
Centro de Nacional Memoria & University of British Colombia.
Connerton, P. (1989). How societies remember. Cambridge, Enland
Cambridge University Press.
Deloria, V. (2009). C. G. Jung and the Sioux traditions: Dreams, visions,
nature, and the primitive. New Orleans, LA: Spring Journal Books.
DuBois, W. E. B. (1935). Black reconstruction in America. London,
England: Transaction.
Freud, S. (1986/1962). The aetiology of hysteria. In: Standard Edition (vol.
3, J. Strachey, trans.). London, UK: Hogarth Press.
Griggs, R. A. (2017). Psychology: A concise introduction (5th ed.). New
York, NY: Worth Publishers.
Herman, J. (1997). Trauma and recovery: the aftermath of violence—from
domestic abuse to political terror. New York, NY: BasicBooks.