48 Jan De Vos
needs to be done” (p. 23). Hence this issue is not merely to be conscious of
one’s partiality, but rather to be consciously partial, to take sides, to be
partisan, that is what being objective is about. Reclaiming our non-
psychology, hence, cannot but be a political project.
REFERENCES
Agamben, G. (2002). Remnants of Auschwitz. New York: Zone books.
Althusser, L. (1971). Ideology and Ideological State Apparatuses (Notes
towards an investigation) Lenin and Philosophy and Other Essays.
London: New Left Books.
Bear, M. F., Connors, B. W., & Paradiso, M. A. (2015). Neuroscience:
Exploring the brain (4th Ed). New York Wolters Kluwer.
Coon, D., & Mitterer, J. (2012). Introduction to psychology: Thomson
Learning.
De Vos, J. (2012). Psychologisation in times of globalisation. London:
Routledge.
De Vos, J. (2013). Psychologization and the Subject of Late Modernity.
New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
De Vos, J. (2015). Self-help and pop psychology. In I. Parker (Ed.),
Handbook of Critical Psychology (pp. 250-258). London: Routledge.
De Vos, J. (2016). The metamorphoses of the brain. Neurologization and
its discontents. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Feldman, R. S. (2015). Essentials of understanding psychology.
Griggs, R. A. (2010). Psychology: A concise introduction: Macmillan.
Hockenbury, S. E., Nolan, S. A., & Hockenbury, D. H. (2015). Psychology
(7th ed.). New York, NY: Worth.
Laclau, E. (2005). On populist reason. London: Verso.
Laclau, E., & Mouffe, C. (1985). Hegemony and socialist strategy:
Towards a radical democratic politics. London UK: Verso Books.
Lesnik-Oberstein, K. (2015). Motherhood, evolutionary psychology and
mirror neurons or: ‘Grammar is politics by other means.’ Feminist
Theory, 16(2), 171-187.