bySIMONCROMPTON
(@Simoncrompton2)
Simonis a science, medical and
health writer
FE ATURE DNA DETECTIVES
HOW ‘SNAPSHOT’ DNA
PHENOTYPING WORKS
- ParabonusesitsanalysisofcrimesceneDNAtopredictthe
physical appearance and geographic ancestry of a person of interest. - SNPanalysisofDNAsamplerevealsgeneticvariantsthatcan
predict:geneticancestry,eye colour, hair colour, skin colour,
freckling and face shape. - Eachtraitis givena confidence rating: how likely it is, given the
strength of genetic markers. - Thisdatais builtintocomputer-generatedimagesofthecrime
suspect’sface.A smallstudyfromtheUniversityofTexasfound
thesevisualpredictionsoffacialfeaturesandancestrytobe
generallyrecognisable.ButDeniseSyndercombeCourt,professorof
forensicgeneticsatKing’sCollegeLondon, questions whether the
representations are robust enough. - Geneticphenotypingis oftenusedalongsidegeneticgenealogy,to
narrowdownpotentialsuspectsidentifiedinfamilytrees.For
example,if a personofinterestis knowntobeAfricanAmerican,
butDNAphenotypingsuggeststheyarelikelytohavegreeneyes,
genealogistswillfocusonthe branch of the family tree that has
most European influence.
“THE UK NATIONAL CRIMINAL
INTELLIGENCE DNA DATABASE,
25 YEARS OLD THIS YEAR, HOLDS
INFORMATION ON AROUND 10
PER CENT OF THE UK POPULATION
AT ANY ONE TIME”
2 to compareagainstonGEDmatch,comparedwith1,000,000
in2018.“It’snowmuchmoredifficulttosolvethesecases
andnarrowthemdownasspecificallyasweusedto,”she
says.“Wedon’thaveenoughdata,whichmeansa lotmore
workhastogointoit.”Investigatorsmayneed to ask certain
linesofdescendantsforDNAsamples.
Thereareotherlimitationsthatmayrestrictexpansion.
ThosewhosubmitDNAtoresearchtheirancestrytendtobe
ofEuropeanextraction– standinginthewayofgrowthin
manycountries.DataprotectionlawsinEuropearegenerally
tighterthantheUnitedStates.Andsomeexpertsbelieve
thereissimplynoneedforgeneticgenealogy in countries
thatoperateaneffectivecrimedatabase.
DeniseSyndercombeCourt,professorofforensicgenetics
at King’sCollegeLondon,saysthattheUKhasn’tgonedown
thegeneticgenealogyroute,partlybecauseit alreadyhasa
databasethatrepresentsa morerelevantpopulation.TheUK
NationalCriminalIntelligenceDNADatabase, 25 yearsold
thisyear,holdsinformationonaround 10 percentoftheUK
populationat anyonetime– becauseit includesDNAdataon
crimesuspectsaswellasthosewhohavecommittedcrimes.
AccordingtoSyndercombeCourt,a complicatedDNA
analysisthatcanidentifydistantcousinsisn’trequiredif your
crimedatabaseis comprehensiveenough.“TheUKdatabase
containsinformationononeineightmalesbetweentheage
of 15and 45 to50,soit’sverypowerful,”shesays.Inthecase
ofunsolvedseriousoffences,DNAcanbecomparedtothis
databaseandit is likelytopickupcloserelatives– parents,
children,fullsiblingsandsometimeshalfsiblingsanduncles.
“TheproblemintheUnitedStatesisthattheyhaven’t
beenputtingtheirfelonsontoanidentifiableDNAdatabase.
Most of these people couldhavebeenpickedupmanyyears
agoif theUnitedStateshada
propergovernancestructure.We
havethat,somyfeelingisthat
thenumberofcasesit wouldbe
usefulforintheUK would be
very limited.”
* IMAGE SHOWS A VOLUNTEER, NOT A CRIMINAL