THE FUNDAMENTALS OF LIFE
GE
TT
Y,^ W
IKI
PE
DI
A^ C
OM
MO
NS
5 event held in 1803 in London, for
example, Giovanni Aldini (nephew of
the pioneering anatomist Luigi
Galvani) applied electricity to George
Forster’s brain to show how it caused
the muscles of his face to twitch.
Forster didn’t know much about this
- he’d just been hanged for the murder
of his wife and child. But for the
audience it helped to show how
electricity was part of the way that
nerves communicate.
Even as the scientific establishment
came to recognise the brain’s
functional significance, however,
another mistaken dogma persisted –
the idea that mental functions, such
as language, are distributed uniformly
throughout the cortex rather than
being partly localised in specific
brain regions.
One historical patient played a
particularly important role in helping
to overturn this idea. His name was
Louis Victor Leborgne, but he was
nicknamed ‘Tan’, because this was
virtually the only word he could utter.
At autopsy, t he French neu rologist
Paul Broca discovered that Leborgne
had highly localised damage to a
region in his left frontal cortex, known
today as Broca’s area, and he inferred
that the damaged region must play an
important role in speech.
Broca’s presentation of Leborgne’s
case to the Société d’Anthropologie
and the Société Anatomique in 1861
was instrumental in convincing the
academic community that language
function is particularly dependent
on the frontal lobes. The historian
Stanley Finger describes this moment
as a “key turning point in the history
of the brain sciences”. Patients like
Leborgne, wit h pa r ticula r mental or
physical def icits tied to specif ic a reas
of brain damage, have been one of the
most important sources of information
about the workings of the brain, and
this is still true today.
At the end of the 19th century, brain
science was focused once again on the
perplexing issue of how exactly nerves
ma nage to communicate wit h each
other. While the earlier realisation of
electricity’s role had helped to debunk
t he notion of a nimal spirits, it was
clear that there was more to nerve
communication. We k now today t hat
electrical current along a nerve cell
(neuron) causes it to release chemicals
across a tiny gap – a synapse – and
these chemicals, known as
neurotransmitters, are then picked
up on the other side by the receiving
neuron. In the late 1800s, however,
even the best microscopes and
staining methods were incapable of
revealing the presence of these gaps
between neurons. This led the Italian
scientist Camillo Golgi and his
contemporaries to propose that nerves
are fused together – an erroneous idea
known as the ‘reticular theory’ (from
the Latin for ‘net’).
It was the Spanish neuroscientist
Santiago Ramón y Cajal who killed
off the nerve net idea thanks to his
advances in cell staining techniques,
which made it clear that neurons are
not joined together after all.
Brain activity
In the 20th century, technology began
to play an increasingly important role
in advancing our knowledge of the
brain, pa r ticula rly by allowing
psychologists and neuroscientists
to monitor brain activity. In the
1920s, scientists sta r ted to use
electroencephalography (EEG), which
involves recording electricity emitted
by the brain through electrodes placed
425 BC
The Hippocratic treatise
On the Sacred Disease
states, contrary to the
dominant cardiocentric
view, that “from the brain
and the brain only arise our
pleasures, joys, laughter and
jests, as well as our sorrows,
pains, griefs and tears.”
C.130-210
In the 2nd century, the
philosopher Galen of
Pergamon performs the
pig demonstration (see
p74), showing that the
brain controls behaviour.
1543
Renaissance anatomist
Andreas Vesalius publishes
his landmark book On the
Fabric of the Human Body,
showing some of the
most detailed dissections
of the human brain
ever produced.
1848
Railway worker Phineas
Gage becomes one of the
most famous patients in
neuroscience after surviving
an accident in which an iron
rod passes straight through
the front of his brain,
changing his personality.
1830s
Phrenology reaches the
peak of its popularity. This
was the mistaken idea that
psychological aptitudes and
personality traits can be
discerned from the bumps
on someone’s skull.
“Previously, researchers had to make
assumptions. With EEG they could see how
different brain regions became more active”
TIMELINE