Living in the Ottoman Realm. Empire and Identity, 13th to 20th Centuries

Darling|181

Tietze. 2 vols. Vienna: Österreischschen Akademie der Wissenschaften, 1979–1982.
This diatribe by an Ottoman official is the only advice work fully translated into
English.
Tezcan, Baki. The Second Ottoman Empire: Political and Social Transformation in the
Early Modern World. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010. Tezcan
reconceptualizes the post-Süleymanic period.

Notes

. Káldy-Nagy, “The ‘Strangers,’” 167.
. Su, Balıkesir, 1–3, cited in ibid., 167.
. Káldy-Nagy, “The ‘Strangers,’” 168.
. Kütükoğlu, “Lütfi Paşa Âsafnâmesi,” 81 (my translation).
. Howard, “The Ottoman Timar System,” 9.
. Mustafa Ali, Nushat al-salatin.
. I b i d.
. Itzkowitz, Ottoman Empire and Islamic Tradition, 60.
. Mustafa Ali, Nushat al-salatin, 17.
. Ibid., 18–19.
. Ibid., 47.
. Ibid., 84.
. Ibid., 53.
. Howard, “The Ottoman Timar System,” 180–182; Darling, “Nasîhatnâmeler.”
. Some modern scholars believe, however, that although Mustafa Ali’s analysis rep-
resented the feelings of the elite, it might not have accurately reflected the situation on the
ground. See, for example, Abou-El-Haj, Formation of the Modern State.
. İpşirli, “Hasan Kâfî el-Akhisarî.”
. İpşirli, “Hasan Kâfî el-Akhisarî,” 253 (my translation).
. Mutafčieva and Dimitrov, Sur l’ état du système des timars; Darling, “Nasîhatnâmeler—
Part II.”
. Naima, Annals of the Turkish Empire, 56–58, 65, 111, 119–122.
. Veysî, Khab-Name, 113; Fodor, “State and Society,” 227–228.
.Kitab-i Müstetab, 8, 39.
. Petrosyan, “The Janissary Corps,” 3:752.
. Tezcan, “The 1622 Military Rebellion,” 28; Tezcan, “Searching for Osman,” 204–205,
220–240; Piterberg, An Ottoman Tragedy, 19–20.
. Volney, Travels through Syria and Egypt,143.
. Koçi Bey, Koçi Bey risalesi, 55–56.
. Ibid., 47–52.
. Ibid., 57.
.ɇAziz Efendi, Kanûn-Nâme-i Sultânî, 6.
. Howard, “The Ottoman Timar System,” 208, 210.
. Faroqhi, Towns and Townsmen, 272–278, 282–287; Özel, “Banditry, State and Economy,”

66. Özel notes that the Celalis and the missing villagers numbered about the same, suggesting
    where most of the missing villagers went (69).