see fig. S14B for the somata). Around half of
the 326 proteins encoded by monosome-
preferring transcripts exhibited protein abun-
dances that were greater than the average (Fig.
6D and table S1), indicating that monosome-
preferring transcripts can also encode highly
abundant proteins. We next examined the
properties of the high-abundance proteins
encoded by monosome-preferring transcripts
(“mono-high”;n= 177). To investigate whether
the mono-high protein abundance is related
to mRNA abundance in the neuropil, we used
RNA-seq to estimate local transcript levels (fig.
S13B). Consistent with the correlation be-
tween the local transcriptome and proteome
(R^2 =0.26;Pvalue < 2.2 × 10−^16 ), the mono-
high genes had higher mRNA levels (Fig. 6E;
see fig. S14C for the somata). We then looked
at the relationship between mono-high pro-
tein abundance and local translation rates, a
measurement obtained from neuropil total
footprint libraries (without biochemical frac-
tionation) (fig. S13C). Perhaps predictably,
we observed that mono-high transcripts were
among the most highly translated mRNAs
within the neuropil, which agrees with the
overall positive correlation between the neu-
ropil proteome and local translatome (R^2 =
0.33;Pvalue < 2.2 × 10−^16 ) (Fig. 6F; see fig. S14D
for the somata). Thus, monosome-translated
transcripts can contribute to the neuropil
proteome composition by encoding a full
range of low- and high-abundance proteins,
depending on their expression level and
translation rate.
Discussion
In this work, we investigated the translational
landscape in neuronal processes and identi-
fied local translation on 80Smonosomes as an
essential source of synaptic proteins. To date,
knowledge about the conformation of the
translational machinery near synapses has
originated primarily from electron micro-
graphs. In these studies ribosomes are un-
ambiguously identified when organized as a
polysome cluster formed by more than three
ribosomes ( 45 ). The sparse distribution of
polysomes in dendrites and spines apparent
in electron micrographs has led some to sug-
gest that local proteinsynthesis represents a
minor source of synaptic protein under basal
conditions ( 46 ). Indeed, until the recent de-
tection of mRNAs and the machinery needed
for their translation ( 5 , 47 , 48 ), the inability
to identify polysomes in electron microscopy
(EM) images from mature axons led to asser-
tions that mature axons obtain protein exclu-
sively via intracellular transport from the soma.
Although a previous EM study suggested the
putative visualization of monosomes in den-
dritic spines ( 45 , 49 ), monosomes have not
been identified with certainty, because their
small size (10 to 25 nm) makes it difficult to
distinguish them from other dark-staining
cytoplasmic particles ( 45 ). A previous study
using a fluorescent reporter suggested that
monosome translation might be associated
with sporadic (isolated) translation events in
cultured neuron processes ( 50 ). In this study,
we detected substantial levels of ongoing pro-
tein synthesis in the synaptic neuropil in vivo,
andhereweprovidedirectevidenceforthe
preferential translation of many pre- and pos-
tsynaptic transcripts by monosomes. This find-
ing thus bridges the gap between the relative
paucity of visualized translational machinery in
neuronal processes and actual measurements
of local translation.
Dendritic spines and their associated presyn-
aptic boutons that comprise the excitatory syn-
apse are small subcellular compartments, often
<100 nm^3 for spines ( 51 ). The relatively large
dimensions of a polysome [~100 to 200 nm
( 7 )] limit the possibilities for high ribosome
occupancy in spines and axon terminals. In-
deed, each dendritic spine has been estimated
to contain, on average, one polyribosome ( 52 ).
The observed low density of polysomes at syn-
apses could be due to a limited pool of avail-
able ribosomes in neuronal processes compared
with cell bodies. In agreement with this con-
cept, we observed a decrease in the percentage
of ribosomal RNA (rRNA) relative to total
RNA as well as a de-enrichment of ribosomal
proteins in the neuropil compared with the
somata. Translation via smaller machines (i.e.,
monosomes) allows for more protein synthesis
sites within synaptic compartments. Polysomes
Bieveret al.,Science 367 , eaay4991 (2020) 31 January 2020 5of14
AB
Atp6v1b2Atp6v1a
Atp6v1c1
Gabra1*Gabrb2
Gabrb3Gabrg2
AP1g1AP2a2
AP2b1AP3b2
AP3m2AP3d1
Synrg
Aak1
Clathrin aClathrin b
Glutamate receptor & interactors
Endocytosis
Docking & fusion
Inhibitory receptors
Vamp
Synaptotagmins
Synaptophysins
V-ATPase
GluGlu––HH++ Synaptogyrins
Synapsins 1/2
CAPS
NSF
aSNAP
Actin
Munc13a*
Bsn
Syntaxin6/12 Munc18
Rab3c MyH10
MyH10
Cell Adhesion
PSD & scaffold
SAP102Dlg2*
Lrcc7*
Dlgap3,4*Dlg4*
Mpp2*
Adcy2IP3R1
Ryr2*Calb2*
Camk2aCamkv
Prkar1aCalm1
NrgnHpca
Hpcal4*
Calcium signaling & kinases
Ppp2r1a,2a,5ePpp1r1a,9a
Ppp3ca
Ppp3cb*
Ppp1r14a,1b,9b,12b,16b,3c,3g*
Phosphatases
Ion channels
Cacnb1Kcnab2Cacna2d1Cacna2d3
Cacna1e
Transporters
Slc1a2*Slc4a2*Slc30a4,a5,a9Slc12a2
Slc4a10
Plcb1Pik3c3
Pik3r4Pi4ka
Dgkb
Dgkz
Phosphatidylinositol signaling
GABA AGABA B1
Microtubule dynamics
Tub1a
Map1a/b*Map2*
Mapa/b*Kif1a/b
Kif3a
Dync1i1Kifap3
Dync1li1Dync1i2
Tub1bKlc1/2
Dynactin 2Nefl Cargo
Cargo
Kinesin
Dynein
microtubule
Cplx1/2*
Pclo*
AP
AP
AP
Regulators of local translation
Eif3a,cEif2a
Rptor
Rpl4,Rpl7,Rpl15,Rpl36alRplp0*
Rpl3,11,14,18,19,24,27,28,34*Rpsa*
Rps3*
Eif3fEif4f
Eif4ebp1*Eif5a*
Eef1b2,dEef2*
Gria1Gria2*
Grin2b*Gria3
Grm1*
Grm5Cnih2*
Cacng7*Rasgrf1
Cacng8*Sh3glb2
Shisa7Grasp
Rgs14
NMDARs mGluRs AMPARs
Nlgn1* Dynamin
Nrxn1*
L1CAMNrCAM
Teneurin 2/3/4Adam 22/23
DCC
EphR 5/6
Ephrin B3
Actin dynamics
Pak1,3
LimkPak6
MarcksRhoA
Cfn
Waver1
Arpc3Arpc2
Pfn
Actin
TPM1/3
monosome-enriched
polysome-enriched
actin filament bundle
cell cortex part
myofibril
cell cortex
cytoplasmic region
distal axon
site of polarized growth
dendritic tree
plasma membrane bounded cell projection part
glutamatergic synapse
synapse part
somatodendritic compartment
plasma membrane region
cytoplasmic vesicle
neuron projection
intracellular vesicle
vesicle
synapse
0246
-log 10 FDR
Fig. 4. Monosomes translate many key synaptic transcripts in dendrites and axons.(A) GO terms representing the top 10 significantly enriched protein function
groups for monosome-enriched (cyan) or polysome-enriched (orange) transcripts. (B) Scheme of pre- and postsynaptic compartments highlighting some of the
transcripts preferentially translated by monosomes (cyan) or polysomes (orange). Asterisks denote key synaptic components that were manually added, owing to
their exclusion by the excitatory neuron-specific filter. (See table S1 for information about the fold changes.)
RESEARCH | RESEARCH ARTICLE