Power Politics 59
robust defense of individual states will become the main obstacles for
creating an effective and lasting counter-hegemonic alliance.
Under these conditions it seems that the future of (South) East Asia
will be determined by two key decisions (see figure 4-3). The first is the
willingness of the USA to balance China. Given that the USA is a sea
power with enormous economic power, China will not able to compete
with the USA at sea anytime soon. The other is whether China will focus
on land or sea. A focus on land would improve the security situation of
East Asian States, whereas a focus on sea would have the opposite effect.
Figure 4-3: strategic prospect of SEA^6
Access
denial–
defensive
doctrine
Disintegrated
doctrine
Land Cheap and
stable
deterrence
Without
significant
competition
Deterrence, at
least in short time
horizon
Sea Stable – if costly – deterrence
within 5-10
years
Later,
deterrence only
for the strongest
(Japan)
No deterrence,
the most
dangerous
scenario
Possibility of
escalation for an
insignificant issue
China
Focuses
on
Minor powers within the
region opt for
Access denial
- defensive
doctrine
Disintegrated
doctrine
Land Cheap and
extremely stable
deterrence
Deterrence.
However, some
offensively oriented
doctrines combined
with the presence
of the USA could
force China to
acquire sea power
Sea Stable deterrence,
even in the long
run
Deterrence,
however the USA
will bear
disproportionate
share of burdens
Potential for
escalation
Minor powers within the
region opt for
Without the USA With the USA
In Place of a Conclusion: Implications for Taiwan
In order to finalize the previous discussion, I would like to provide the key
implication for Taiwan. Taiwan is a small nation, and, as it is (for
historical and strategic reasons) the focal point of Chinese foreign policy,
one can guess that its position is highly problematic.
(^6) Source: author.