The Washington Post - 19.03.2020

(Marcin) #1

THURSDAy, MARCH 19 , 2020. THE WASHINGTON POST eZ re A25


THURSDAY Opinion


S


o Mitch McConnell thinks his pro-
spective Democratic opponent
should stop running mean ads
against him during the coronavirus
crisis.
The poor dear.
“A s Senator McConnell leads bipartisan
efforts to help Kentuckians and all Ameri-
cans cope with the impact of the coronavi-
rus, Amy McGrath continues to run mil-
lions of dollars in false, negative political
advertising designed to tear us apart,” Mc-
Connell’s campaign manager said in a
statement Tuesday, citing neither ad nor
falsehood but denouncing her “refusal to
stop airing false political advertising dur-
ing the coronavirus outbreak.”
For McConnell, this is a most conve-
nient demand: With the coronavirus crisis
likely to go on for months, McConnell
could have his reelection come and go in
November without anybody running ads
detailing how the Senate majority leader,
the self-styled “grim reaper,” has done
more in recent years than any other per-
son to embitter our politics and incapaci-
tate government.
Making McConnell’s umbrage all the
more cynical: Groups affiliated with him
have gone about their political attacks even
as he claims that he should be immune.
The coronavirus crisis hasn’t stopped the
National Republican Senatorial Committee,
an arm of the Republican Senate leader-
ship, from making statements attacking
Democratic Senate candidate (and gover-
nor) Steve Bullock in Montana (“ran his ad-
ministration like a frat house”), Democratic
Senate candidate Raphael Warnock in
Georgia (“launching a political campaign
with a police report is never a good look”)
and Democratic Senate candidate Mark
Kelly in Arizona (“he’s for sale to the high-
est bidder”).
The crisis didn’t stop One Nation, a dark-
money group allied with McConnell, from
launching a $700,000 ad campaign this
week in support of Sen. Martha McSally
(R-Ariz.) and a $970,000 campaign boost-
ing Sen. Joni Ernst (R-Iowa).
The crisis didn’t stop a super PAC run by
McConnell allies, the Senate Leadership
Fund, from meddling last month in a Dem-
ocratic Senate primary in North Carolina,
or this month in a Republican primary in
Georgia. Nor has McConnell expressed sim-
ilar concern about Republican super PACs
attacking Democratic Sen. Gary Peters in
Michigan, Democratic Senate candidate
Sara Gideon in Maine and Democratic Sen-
ate candidate Jaime Harrison in South Car-
olina — all during the current crisis.
The Republicans’ outrage about cam-
paigning during the coronavirus outbreak
appears to reflect a desire to self-isolate Re-
publicans from any political damage from
the response to the virus. For example,
McSally this week said she was temporarily
suspending her campaign — “This is not a
time for politics,” she said — conveniently
just as the McConnell-associated group be-
gan running ads on her behalf. No doubt
Republicans would like social distancing
between themselves and the political fall-
out from the virus — but that’s not how de-
mocracy works.
Certainly, Democrats and Republicans
need to work together now and in the fu-
ture to pass legislation to combat the virus
and its economic impact. But elections go
on during times of crisis and war. And the
bungled handling of the virus is exactly the
sort of mismanagement that should dis-
qualify President Trump from reelection. It
would be political malpractice if Democrats
didn’t point out that the Trump administra-
tion’s lack of preparedness for the virus and
its woeful early response are direct conse-
quences of Trump’s leadership failures —
and of congressional Republicans’ failure to
hold him accountable.
Trump depleted the government of scien-
tific expertise and did little to heed warn-
ings to prepare for a pandemic. He blocked
Congress from conducting meaningful
oversight. He repeatedly proposed cutting
public health and medical research. The
constant turnover and reliance on “acting”
officials eroded competence. His reckless
stimulus legislation during an economic
boom and his badgering of the Federal Re-
serve to lower interest rates left few fiscal
and monetary tools to stop the ongoing
economic panic. His constant stream of
falsehoods misled the nation about the
threat of the virus and contributed to a de-
layed, haphazard response. His administra-
tion badly misjudged the impact of the vi-
rus and was claiming until just a couple of
weeks ago that it would require no addi-
tional government spending.
And now, Trump dodges responsibility.
“It snuck up on us,” he claimed at a White
House briefing Wednesday. “This is a very
unforeseen thing,” he claimed. As for well-
connected people getting tests when others
can’t, he said: “Perhaps that’s been the sto-
ry of life.” He also used the virus briefing to
say that “I’m beating Sleepy Joe Biden by a
lot in Florida,” that “I’m 95 percent of the
Republican Party” and that China may be
punished for the “Chinese virus.”
Snuck up on us? Unforeseen? Trump dis-
missed warning after warning after warn-
ing. Now, we work as one to save our lives
and our economy. But there will be no way
for Trump and McConnell to quarantine
the consequences of their bad leadership.
(The columnist’s wife is a pollster for Ari-
zona Senate candidate Mark Kelly.)
Twitter: @Milbank

DANA MILBANK
WasHIngton sKetcH

The GOP can’t


self-quarantine


from elections


E


ver since John Winthrop boasted
in 1630 that the Massachusetts Bay
Colony would be “a city upon a
hill,” Americans have believed that
we have a mission to lead the world,
whether by the power of example or by
sheer power. That s elf-confidence has been
bolstered by a century of achievements:
We saved Western civilization from Ger-
man and Soviet militarism, built the most
prosperous society in history and landed a
man on the moon.
Our self-confidence, verging on hubris,
should be shaken by the coronavirus. The
United States has been a laggard, not a
world leader, in confronting the pandemic.
As The Post reported, a German company
shipped more than 1.4 million diagnostic
tests for the World Health Organization by
the end of February. During that same
time, U. S. efforts to produce our own test
misfired. By Feb. 28, only 4,000 tests from
the Centers for Disease Control and Pre-
vention had been used. U.S. testing is now
ramping up, but as of Tuesday we had
tested only about 56,000 people, or 1 in
5,800 Americans. South Korea has tested
274,000 people, or 1 in 187 South Koreans.
“Losing two months is close to disastrous,
and that’s what we did,” Ashish Jha,
director of the Harvard Global Health
Institute, told Bloomberg News.
We s hould not be especially surprised by
our failure at pandemic-fighting, because
if we are being honest with ourselves, we
would h ave to admit that the United States
has long been failing. We r emain one of the
richest countries in the world, but by
international standards we look more like
a Third World nation.
As Quartz pointed out in 2017, we lag in
almost every measure of societal well-
b eing among the wealthy nations (now 36)
of the Organization for Economic Cooper-
ation and Development (OECD). As of
2016, we had the second-highest poverty
rate, the highest level of income inequality
and the highest level of obesity. We spent
the most on education but produced
less-than-average results. We were also
below average on renewable energy, infra-
structure investment and voter turnout.
We are the only OECD nation that doesn’t
mandate paid family leave. One area
where we do lead is gun violence. Our
homicide rate is nearly 50 percent above
the OECD average.
Our health-care failures are particularly
important now. We spend more on health
care than any other country in the world,
but we are the only OECD country without
universal medical coverage (27.9 million
Americans lacked health insurance in
2018). Child mortality in the United States
is the highest in the OECD, and life
expectancy is below average. We have far
fewer hospital beds per capita than other
advanced democracies (2.4 compared with
12.2 in South Korea), which makes us
particularly vulnerable to a pandemic.
Why has America become so backward?
That is a complex topic. I would direct
readers to the work of analysts such as
Jonathan Rauch, Francis Fukuyama, and
Norman Ornstein and Thomas Mann. But
I would ascribe a lot of what’s wrong to
growing partisan polarization that makes
it almost impossible to address our most
pressing needs. Republicans are getting
more conservative and Democrats more
liberal — although not to the same degree.
The GOP is far more extreme than the
Democratic Party.
President Trump has exacerbated the
problem, but he didn’t start it. He is
himself the product of decades of right-
wing revolt against government and in-
creasingly against reason itself. America is
unusual in having a major party — and a
major television network — devoted to
climate denialism and protecting the
“right” of everyone to own an assault rifle.
The GOP and the right-wing media have
long been a hotbed of nutty conspiracy
theories, and their reluctance to face the
reality of the new coronavirus set back
efforts to save lives.
The Republicans’ decades-long demoni-
zation of government has consequences.
As Bloomberg columnist Noah Smith not-
ed, the federal civilian workforce h as fallen
as a percentage of total nonfarm employ-
ment from 18 percent in 1980 to 15 percent
today, and their salaries top out at just
under $200,000 — “only slightly more
than an entry-level engineer makes at
Google.” There are still plenty of high-
q uality civil servants, but their ranks are
too thin, and they are too much at the
mercy of political yahoos. “When a typical
European parliamentary government
changes hands from one party to another,
the ministers and a handful of staffers turn
over,” Fukuyama notes. “In the U.S., a
change of administration (even within the
same party) opens up some 5,000 ‘Sched-
ule C’ j ob positions t o political appointees.”
That means Trump’s band of grifters can
do far more damage than they could in,
say, France or Germany.
The coronavirus failure should be a
wake-up call that Trump has not made
America great again. Quite the opposite:
He has accelerated our decline. We must
not only beat this pandemic; we must also
address a host of other ills that have been
festering for decades. In recent years,
America has been “exceptional” mainly in
the scale of our governmental failures
compared with those of other industrial-
ized democracies.
Twitter: @MaxBoot

MAX BOOT

A lesson


in our


backwardness


BY CATHY MERRILL

I


b elieve in science, trust experts
and have spent the past week
self-quarantining and yelling at
my k ids to wash their hands. But I
was still floored when the Centers for
Disease Control and Prevention
(CDC) announced that gatherings
should be put off until May 15. I am a
small-business owner with roughly
75 employees. Like most of my busi-
ness-owner friends, I had hope last
week that we could all hunker down
and get through this crisis quickly.
But that hope has been extinguished
by the restrictions on gatherings
urged, and in some cases imposed, by
the Trump administration, the CDC
and state governors.
May 15 is eight weeks away. How
many of the officials setting emergen-
cy policy have ever run a small
business? Very few, I suspect. To be
clear: Two months is not a hiatus; it is
a death sentence for small business.
How can the government help?
Each emergency-related decision
needs to be revisited in shorter and
more predictable periods of time as
the science dictates. Mass testing for
the coronavirus will become avail-
able. We n eed to calibrate for the facts
as they develop.
Let’s all keep social distancing, as
the experts say it will reduce spread,
but let’s revisit curfews and gathering
restrictions in two-week segments.
Give us businesses hope that we
might reopen before May 15. Give
parents hope that their children will

go b ack to school before the end of the
academic year. Parents of the 22 mil-
lion children who receive free and
reduced-price lunches could particu-
larly use that hope. It might be
illusory, but maybe not. (Remember,
social distancing is supposed to
work.) Americans can do anything for
a week or two, but 60 days is a
lifetime. Businesses will go under,
and kids will go on unsanctioned play
dates. And let’s not even talk about
teens and young adults who are
supposed to forgo social life and
dating for that long.
The math is simple. There are
roughly 30 million small businesses
(firms with fewer than 500 employ-
ees) in the United States, represent-
ing 49 percent of private-sector jobs.
Most businesses — big and small —
have a profit margin of roughly 10 to
20 percent (if they are lucky). A
two-month hiatus means their profit
is gone for the year. So, say we aim to
break even. But to break even, we
must rebound fully after the two-
month “hiatus.” Who believes that
will happen? None of my small-
b usiness CEO friends.
So now we are faced with a loss.
What to do? Ta ke a small-business
loan? Why would I create more debt
in uncertain times? Think about it:
For restaurant owners, the biggest
expense after employees is rent. Are
they going to borrow money so they
can just pay the landlord? Why not
close shop and declare bankruptcy?
Maybe start again with a much lower
lease if the economy revs back up a

year from now. If you are near retire-
ment or near the end of your lease,
this decision is easier: quit now while
you still have a little cash left. Layoffs,
which are already happening, will be
enormous and widespread by the
beginning of next week. Bankruptcies
are certain to follow.
As E lon Musk told Te sla employees,
coronavirus panic is worse than the
virus itself. Virus infections can at
least, eventually, be quantified. But
who is going to quantify the number
of deaths from unemployment stress,
food insecurity, depression or lost
health insurance — plus the spike in
suicide rates and heart angina from
the stress of being laid off or fur-
loughed?
Without fast action, our country is
going to experience record unemploy-
ment levels, possibly higher than
even those in the Great Depression.
Government needs to act quickly, but
it also needs to be able to revise
quickly. Set policies, and then amend
as conditions warrant. The notion
that the nation will be able to freeze
small business in place for two
months and restart it with ease is
preposterous.
While I believe that the United
States has the smartest scientists in
the world, I don’t believe anyone can
predict where the country will be
60 days from now. Let’s not try. Let’s
leave the door open to revise policy
and loosen restrictions.

the writer is chief executive and owner of
Washingtonian Magazine.

A death sentence


for small business


daVId ryder/reuters
A restaurant in Kirkland, Wash., on Wednesday.

BY JOSIAH RICH, SCOTT ALLEN
AND MAVIS NIMOH

U


nless government officials act
now, the novel coronavirus
will spread rapidly in our jails
and prisons, endangering not
only prisoners and corrections workers
but the general public as well. As the
country prepares for further spread of
the pandemic, authorities should take
immediate steps to limit the risk posed
by mass confinement, including releas-
ing those detained on bail, along with
elderly prisoners who pose little dan-
ger to the public.
Early on in this pandemic, we
learned that, as with other closed
spaces such as cruise ships and nurs-
ing homes, the novel coronavirus
spread rapidly in Chinese correctional
facilities. Now the United States,
which leads the world when it comes
to incarceration, faces that same chal-
lenge.
It is essential to understand that,
despite being physically secure, jails
and prisons are not isolated from the
community. People continuously enter
and leave, including multiple shifts of
corrections staff; newly arrested,
charged and sentenced individuals;
attorneys; and visitors. Even if this
flow is limited to the extent possible,
correctional facilities remain densely
populated and poorly designed to pre-
vent the inevitable rapid and wide-
spread dissemination of this virus.
At the same time, jails and prisons
house individuals at h igher risk than in
other settings, such as schools and
restaurants, that have been closed to
mitigate contamination. Although cor-
rections facilities cannot be closed,
they must be included in any plan
aimed at slowing the surge in infec-
tions and protecting public safety.
Reassessing security and public
health risks and acting immediately
will save the lives of not only those
incarcerated but also correctional staff

and their families and the community
at large. There are several steps that
authorities should implement as
quickly as possible.
They must screen incoming individ-
uals to prevent and delay infected
individuals from entering facilities.
They must rapidly identify cases and
isolate exposed groups to limit the
spread, as well as quickly transfer
seriously ill patients to appropriate
facilities.
But that won’t be enough. Authori-
ties should release those who do not
pose an immediate danger to public
safety, while also reducing arrests and
delaying sentencings. These moves
carry inherent political risks, but they
are for the greater good of the public at
large. The abrupt onset of severe covid-
19 infections among incarcerated indi-
viduals will require mass transfers to
local hospitals for intensive medical
and ventilator care — highly expensive
interventions that may soon be in very
short supply. Each severely ill patient
coming from corrections who occupies
an ICU bed will mean others may die
for inability to obtain care.
Our ability to release people rapidly
will vary b y type of facility and jurisdic-
tion. Those being held in jails simply
due to their inability to afford bail, or
for minor infractions or violations, can
generally be released promptly by the
judiciary or even the local sheriff. S ome
jurisdictions are already discussing
such mitigation efforts.
Already sentenced individuals pose
a greater challenge — o ne compounded
by the punitive policies of the past few
decades (mandatory minimum sen-
tences, three strikes and life without
parole) that have led to a large, aging
incarcerated population especially vul-
nerable to severe disease. Additionally,
half of all incarcerated people suffer
from at l east one chronic illness, which
means even more will be at risk of a
poor prognosis if they become infected.
Those eligible for parole can and

should be released. Provisions for
“compassionate release/parole” exist
in every state; however, that process is
typically slow, underutilized and very
limited. Fortunately, the people at
highest risk for severe complications of
covid-19 who are incarcerated (the
aging and chronically ill), are, on aver-
age, the least likely to commit a new
crime or need to be re-incarcerated. In
some states, governors have the ability
to commute sentences or pardon indi-
viduals, as does the president in the
federal system.
On the federal level as well, there is a
parallel public health danger lurking
in the immigration detention system,
where thousands of people are being
held in jail-like conditions that pose
similar risks. The Trump administra-
tion could, if it wished, institute a
simple and even temporary policy
change to release those individuals
into the community rather than con-
tain them in an environment where
rapid spread is likely. As unlikely as
this may be given the administration’s
approach to immigration detention,
this may be the easiest fix, given the
broad discretion of the Department of
Homeland Security to change policy.
The spread of the coronavirus may
only be the tipping point for what can
happen when we fail to consider all the
costs and consequences of our system
of mass incarceration. We justify lock-
ing people up to protect public safety.
Ye t public safety will be at even greater
peril if we fail to mitigate risks associ-
ated with confining too many people in
jails, prisons and detention facilities
during a pandemic.

Josiah rich is professor of medicine and
epidemiology at Brown university. scott
allen is professor of medicine emeritus at
the university of california at riverside.
Mavis nimoh is executive director of the
center for Prisoner Health and Human
rights at the Miriam Hospital, of which rich
and allen are co-founders.

The epidemic threat in prisons

Free download pdf