The Washington Post - 19.03.2020

(Marcin) #1

D4 eZ re THE WASHINGTON POST.THURSDAy, MARCH 19 , 2020


SCOREBOARD

PRO BASKETBALL

NBA
ATlANTIc WlPct GB
y-Toronto .....................................46 18 .719 —
y-Boston.......................................43 21 .672 3
Philadelphia .................................39 26 .600 71 / 2
Brooklyn .......................................30 34 .469 16
New York......................................21 45 .318 26
SoUTHEAST WlPct GB
Miami ...........................................41 24 .631 —
Orlando.........................................30 35 .462 11
Washington .................................24 40 .375 161 / 2
Charlotte ......................................23 42 .354 18
Atlanta .........................................20 47 .299 22
cENTRAl WlPct GB
y-Milwaukee ................................53 12 .815 —
Indiana .........................................39 26 .600 14
Chicago.........................................22 43 .338 31
Detroit..........................................20 46 .303 331 / 2
Cleveland......................................19 46 .292 34
SoUTHWEST WlPct GB
Houston........................................40 24 .625 —
Dallas ...........................................40 27 .597 11 / 2
Memphis ......................................32 33 .492 81 / 2
New Orleans ................................28 36 .438 12
San Antonio .................................27 36 .429 121 / 2
NoRTHWEST WlPct GB
Denver ..........................................43 22 .662 —
Utah..............................................41 23 .641 11 / 2
Oklahoma City..............................40 24 .625 21 / 2
Portland .......................................29 37 .439 141 / 2
Minnesota ....................................19 45 .297 231 / 2
PAcIFIc WlPct GB
y-L.A. Lakers ................................49 14 .778 —
L.A. Clippers .................................44 20 .688 51 / 2
Sacramento..................................28 36 .438 211 / 2
Phoenix ........................................26 39 .400 24
Golden State ................................15 50 .231 35
y-clinched playoff spot

HOCKEY

NHL
ATlANTIc GPWloT Pts GF GA
Boston.......................... 70 44 14 12 100 227 174
Tampa Bay ................... 70 43 21 6922 45 195
Toronto ........................ 70 36 25 9812 38 227
Florida .......................... 69 35 26 8782 31 228
Montreal ...................... 71 31 31 9712 12 221
Buffalo ......................... 69 30 31 8681 95 217
Ottawa ......................... 71 25 34 12 62 191 243
Detroit.......................... 71 17 49 5391 45 267
METRoPolITAN GPWloT Pts GF GA
Washington ................. 69 41 20 8902 40 215
Philadelphia ................. 69 41 21 7892 32 196
Pittsburgh .................... 69 40 23 6862 24 196
Carolina ........................ 68 38 25 5812 22 193
Columbus ..................... 70 33 22 15 81 180 187
N.Y. Islanders............... 68 35 23 10 80 192 193
N.Y. Rangers ................ 70 37 28 5792 34 222
New Jersey .................. 69 28 29 12 68 189 230
cENTRAl GPWloT Pts GF GA
St. Louis ....................... 71 42 19 10 94 225 193
Colorado ....................... 70 42 20 8922 37 191
Dallas ........................... 69 37 24 8821 80 177
Winnipeg...................... 71 37 28 6802 16 203
Nashville ...................... 69 35 26 8782 15 217
Minnesota.................... 69 35 27 7772 20 220
Chicago......................... 70 32 30 8722 12 218
PAcIFIc GPWloT Pts GF GA
Vegas ........................... 71 39 24 8862 27 211
Edmonton..................... 71 37 25 9832 25 217
Calgary ......................... 70 36 27 7792 10 215
Vancouver .................... 69 36 27 6782 28 217
Arizona......................... 70 33 29 8741 95 187
Anaheim....................... 71 29 33 9671 87 226
Los Angeles.................. 70 29 35 6641 78 212
San Jose ....................... 70 29 36 5631 82 226

SOCCER

MLS
EAST WlTPts GF GA
Atlanta United ................... 200642
Montreal............................. 101443
New York ............................ 101443
Toronto FC .......................... 101432
Columbus............................ 101421
D.C. United ......................... 110333
Chicago ............................... 011123
New England ...................... 011123
Orlando City........................ 011112
Philadelphia........................ 011135
FC Cincinnati ...................... 020035
Inter Miami CF.................... 020013
New York City FC................ 020002
WEST WlTPts GF GA
Sporting K.C. ...................... 200671
Minnesota United .............. 200683
Colorado.............................. 200642
FC Dallas............................. 101442
Los Angeles FC ................... 101443
Seattle................................ 101432
Portland.............................. 110323
Vancouver........................... 110323
Real Salt Lake .................... 002211
L.A. Galaxy ......................... 011112
San Jose ............................. 011147
Houston .............................. 011115
Nashville SC ....................... 020013

MlS lEAdERS
Through Sunday, March 8
GoAlS
Maximiliano Urruti, MTL ................................................3
Luis Amarilla, MIN ..........................................................2
Ezequiel Barco, ATL ........................................................2
Emerson Hyndman, ATL .................................................2
Gadi Kinda, KC .................................................................2
Kevin Molino, MIN ..........................................................2
Jordan Morris, SEA .........................................................2
Zdenek Ondrasek, DAL....................................................2
Ike Opara, MIN ................................................................2
Alan Pulido, KC................................................................2
Diego Valeri, POR............................................................2
Carlos Vela, LFC ..............................................................2
ASSISTS
Kyle Duncan, NYR ........................................................... 2
Ethan Finlay, MIN ........................................................... 2
Jan Gregus, MIN ............................................................. 2
Pity Martinez, ATL.......................................................... 2
Djordje Mihailovic, CHI ................................................... 2
Jack Price, COL ................................................................ 2
Cristian Roldan, SEA....................................................... 2
Keegan Rosenberry, COL ................................................ 2
Florian Valot, NYR .......................................................... 2
SHoTS
Carlos Vela, LFC ............................................................ 12
Luis Amarilla, MIN.......................................................... 9
Diego Rossi, LFC ............................................................. 9
Raul Ruidiaz, SEA ........................................................... 9
Jozy Altidore, TOR.......................................................... 8
Aleksandar Katai, LA...................................................... 8
Juergen Locadia, CIN ...................................................... 8
Zdenek Ondrasek, DAL ................................................... 8
Gustavo Bou, NE............................................................. 7
Randall Leal, NSH ........................................................... 7
Andre Shinyashiki, COL .................................................. 7
Maximiliano Urruti, MTL ................................................ 7

PRO FOOTBALL

XFL
EAST WlPct PF PA
DC............................................. 32 .600 82 89
St. Louis................................... 32 .600 97 77
New York ................................. 32 .600 79 85
Tampa Bay ............................... 14 .200 98115
WEST WlPct PF PA
Houston ................................... 50 1.000 158111
Dallas ....................................... 23 .400 90102
Los Angeles ............................. 23 .400 129122
Seattle ..................................... 14 .200 87119

support t eams.”
The olympic training center in
Lake Placid, N.Y., was similarly
closed this week. New York’s
olympic regional Development
Authority a nnounced Sunday that
all training facilities, in addition
to all ski mountains, must sus-
pend operations.
The site is the training base for
many athletes who compete in
winter sports, including bobsled-
ders, lugers, biathletes and ski
jumpers. Their competition sea-
sons had largely wrapped, and
many already had left the site.
Similar to the Colorado facility,
the L ake Placid g yms a nd training
centers are closed, but athletes
who remain still have access to
dining and medical services and
conditioning.
[email protected]

struggle to find new training bas-
es; facilities across the country
have been shuttered in recent days,
including private gyms, YmCA
sites and many facilities with
olympic-size swimming pools.
The To kyo Games are sched-
uled to begin July 24. Even as
concerns grow that a postpone-
ment might have t o be considered,
the International olympic Com-
mittee has encouraged athletes to
keep training and planning to
compete this summer.
“The health and well-being of
all those involved in the prepara-
tions for the olympic Games To -
kyo 2020 is our number-one con-
cern,” I oC President Thomas Bach
said in a communique issued
Tuesday. “All measures are being
taken to safeguard the safety and
interests of athletes, coaches and

center and access medical and
dining services, but all of the t rain-
ing facilities are off-limits.
“out of training for a month,”
gymnast S am mikulak, a two-time
olympian and six-time national
champion, posted on Instagram.
“I know I’m not alone on t his, h ow
is everyone else dealing with their
olympic preparation in these
times?”
many other olympic hopefuls
have been displaced this week,
including scores of college ath-
letes targeting To kyo and those
who train at universities’ facilities
— gymnasts, swimmers, divers
and track a nd field athletes among
them — who also had to find new
training accommodations after
campuses closed down.
The athletes who choose to
leave Colorado Springs could

conditioning areas. T hey won’t r e-
open for at least 30 days, accord-
ing to the m essage.
“This is a fluid situation t hat the
State will continue to monitor,”
the athletes were told, “and the
duration could be e xtended.”
The center is the largest train-
ing hub for athletes training for
the olympics. Several U.S. olym-
pic teams use the space on a per-
manent or regular basis, i ncluding
boxing, cycling, shooting and
wrestling. There were about
200 olympic and Paralympic ath-
letes training there this week,
about 75 percent of whom are
considered resident athletes,
which means they stay in dorms
and t rain a t the site full time.
Athletes can stay a t the training


olympICs from D1


U.S. athletes have training interrupted


Morry GAsH/AssocIAted Press

Two-time olympic gymnast sam mikulak took to social media to express his disappointment with being unable to train at his usual facility.


“What conditions need to be
met, for example, for the Games
to proceed? This is the type of
information that we would like
in order to have certainty that
athletes and the general public
will be appropriately protected.”
That’s exactly right. If, in fact,
the IoC is being guided by health
experts the world over, then they
should share the specifics that
are driving their decision-
making processes. According to
the World Health organization,
Japan had 873 confirmed
coronavirus cases as of
Wednesday. Does the IoC have
information that would lead it to
believe that number will be, say,
zero by July 24? What about the
travelers — athletes, sponsors,
fans, all of them — coming from
countries, including the United
States, where the worst is yet to
come?
About the United States: The
USoPC is holding a board
meeting via video conference
Wednesday and Thursday. It is
approaching the first olympics
under the leadership of new CEo
Sarah Hirshland. Will Hirshland
do what her predecessor, Scott
Blackmun, failed to do in
spectacular fashion: protect
athletes’ safety and well-being
above all else?
on Wednesday, the IoC said
Bach held a conference call with
more than 200 athletes from
around the world.
“We will keep acting in a
responsible way in the interest of
the athletes,” Bach told an in-
house IoC interviewer
afterward.
Will they? The athletes are
certainly wondering.
“The decisions the IoC is
making and the way they
communicate those decisions is
not just affecting people four
months in the future,” Xiao wrote
in his email. “It is impacting
them right now.”
Becoming an olympian is, at
some level, built on hopes and
dreams. But staging a safe
olympics must be based on facts
and figures that are clearly
communicated. There is no room
for bravado. The Games may be
months off. The decision to deal
with a delay that feels inevitable
should be made right now.
[email protected]

For more by Barry svrluga, visit
washingtonpost.com/svrluga.

competition, right? That already
seems impossible.
“I think the IoC insisting this
will move ahead, with such
conviction, is insensitive and
irresponsible given the state of
humanity,” Hayley Wickenheiser,
a Canadian hockey player who is
a member of the IoC’s Athletes
Commission, wrote Tuesday on
Twitter. “We don’t know what’s
happening in the next 24 hours,
let alone the next three months.”
The head of the french
swimming federation, a
pharmacist named Gilles
Sezionale who is working on the
coronavirus impact in his
country, was blown away by the
IoC’s tone-deafness this week.
“I can’t explain it,” he said in
an interview with the newspaper
Le Parisien. “What they write is
indecent. It’s shocking.”
Even in their steadfastness,
the IoC must be working
through alternatives and
scenarios. To not do so would be
irresponsible. The athletes
deserve to be included in that
discussion. Short of that, they
should at minimum be informed
of it. How will officials make a
decision? When will officials
make a decision?
“A lthough it’s not correct to
speculate, the message that we
are going full-steam ahead is
speculation,” Xiao wrote in his
email. “We still have no
information about when the
decision will be made whether to
postpone, and how the IoC will
make that decision.

they’re concerned for their safety.
They deserve clear and
transparent messaging about
contingency plans should the
Games not be able to start as
scheduled July 24.
“I would like to encourage all
the athletes to continue their
preparation for the olympic
Games To kyo 2020 with great
confidence and full steam,” IoC
President Thomas Bach said
march 3.
Think about how long ago that
feels and how much has changed
since. Ye t the IoC hasn’t backed
down from that stance, as absurd
as it seems. How is an athlete to
train “with great confidence and
full steam” in the current
environment? Spain and Italy,
for instance, are completely shut
down. Tr y finding great
confidence and full steam there.
“We want the olympics to take
place, but with security,” Spanish
olympic Committee President
Alejandro Blanco said in a
statement reported by reuters.
“We’re an important country in
the world, and four months
before the Games, our athletes
can’t arrive in equal conditions.”
That is plain fact, and Spain is
not alone. There are so many
health concerns when
considering whether to stage an
olympics given there will be
more than 11,000 athletes and
countless officials, fans, media
and workers arriving from all
over the globe. But if experts
deem it safe enough to pull off, it
ought to be done as a fair

morale. Perhaps it serves NBC,
which invested $12 billion to
broadcast 10 Winter and
Summer Games between 2012
and 2032.
You know who it doesn’t
serve? The athletes, on whose
backs the olympics are built but
whose thoughts too frequently
don’t matter enough. Nor does it
serve public health, given the
coronavirus pandemic that has
parts of the world paralyzed.
The athletes are caught in the
middle and have no clear idea
how to proceed. Continue a strict
and regimented training
program designed to peak for
qualifiers that might not take
place? or curtail training in
hopes of protecting themselves
and others — but risk falling
behind if, against all odds, the
show goes on as scheduled?
“A thletes are in a no-win
situation where they are trying
to continue to prepare for the
olympic/Paralympic Games, but
they are finding it more difficult
to do so and will need to take
more and more risks in order to
get the appropriate training,”
Han Xiao, a table tennis player
who serves as the chair of the
USoPC’s Athletes’ Advisory
Council, wrote in an email to The
Washington Post. “They will
eventually be endangering both
themselves and the public in
order to prepare to compete, and
it will not be their fault.”
Xiao said his council does not
have an official position on
whether the olympics should be
postponed or canceled, but it has
heard from athletes across
sports. right now, he said,
athletes are against cancellation,
which makes sense. These people
aren’t just deciding whether to
go for a run after work. These
runs are their whole lives.
Players in the NBA or major
League Baseball will have
another season if this one is
canceled. An athlete preparing
for the To kyo Games has been
building to this point for four
years — and more. The idea of
cancellation makes the brain
hurt and the heart fall.
But Xiao said more athletes
are open to the idea of
postponement. Internationally,
some are calling for it. Their
training already has been
disrupted. Like the rest of us,


sVrluga from D1


BARRY SVRLUGA


IOC thinking only about bottom line, not competitors


JeAn-cHrIstoPHe Bott/AssocIAted Press
IoC president Thomas Bach continued to say the 2020 summer
olympics will proceed as scheduled — without input from athletes.

FINAL USA TODAY
MEN’S TOP 25 POLL
The top 25 teams in the USA Today men’s college
basketball poll, with first-place votes in parentheses,
records through Sunday, points based on 25 points for a
first-place vote through one point for a 25th-place vote
and last week’s ranking:
REcoRd PTS PVS


  1. Kansas (29) 28-3 795 1

  2. Gonzaga (3) 31-2 760 2

  3. Dayton 29-2 741 3

  4. Baylor 26-4 677 5

  5. Florida State 26-5 656 4

  6. San Diego State 30-2 601 6

  7. Kentucky 25-6 569 7

  8. Duke 25-6 507 10

  9. Villanova 24-7 501 8

  10. Creighton 24-7 501 9

  11. Maryland 24-7 486 11

  12. Michigan State 22-9 472 12

  13. Louisville 24-7 427 14

  14. Oregon 24-7 405 13

  15. Seton Hall 21-9 387 15

  16. Brigham Young 24-8 306 16

  17. Virginia 23-7 224 18

  18. Ohio State 21-10 218 20

  19. Wisconsin 21-10 216 19

  20. Auburn 25-6 213 17

  21. Butler 22-9 130 21

  22. Illinois 21-10 124 22

  23. Houston 23-8 110 24

  24. West Virginia 21-10 109 23

  25. Iowa 20-11 91 25


o thers receiving votes: E ast Tennessee State (30-4) 34,
Penn State (21-10) 32, Michigan (19-12) 25, Arizona
(21-11) 18, Stephen F. Austin (28-3) 15, Texas Tech
(18-13) 8, Liberty (30-4) 8, Utah State (26-8) 5, LSU
(21-10) 5, Saint Mary’s (26-8) 4, Southern California
(22-9) 4, Providence (19-12) 4, Northern Iowa (25-6) 4,
UCLA (19-12) 3, Colorado (21-11) 3, Rutgers (20-11) 2.
The USA Today Sports Board of Coaches is made up of 32
head coaches at Division I institutions. All are members
of the National Association of Basketball Coaches.

FINAL USA TODAY
WOMEN’S TOP 25 POLL
The top 25 teams in the USA Today women’s college
basketball poll, with first-place votes in parentheses,
records through Monday, points based on 25 points for a
first-place vote through one point for a 25th-place vote
and last week’s ranking:
REcoRd PTS PVS


  1. South Carolina (26) 32-1 794 1

  2. Oregon (6) 31-2 772 2

  3. Baylor 28-2 715 3

  4. Connecticut 29-3 706 4

  5. Maryland 28-4 682 5

  6. Louisville 28-4 581 6

  7. Stanford 27-6 592 7

  8. North Carolina State 28-4 572 8

  9. UCLA 26-5 543 9

  10. Mississippi State 27-6 523 10

  11. South Dakota 30-2 424 11

  12. Arizona 24-7 384 12

  13. Gonzaga 28-3 372 13

  14. DePaul 28-5 368 14

  15. Northwestern 26-4 359 15

  16. Oregon State 23-9 319 16

  17. Princeton 26-1 291 17

  18. Kentucky 22-8 235 18

  19. Missouri State 26-4 226 19

  20. Florida State 24-8 209 20

  21. Texas A&M 22-8 174 21

  22. Indiana 24-8 168 22

  23. Iowa 23-7 126 23

  24. Florida Gulf Coast 30-3 105 24

  25. Arkansas 24-8 69 25
    o thers receiving votes: T CU (22-7) 20, Arizona State
    (20-11) 10, Dayton (25-8) 9, James Madison (25-4) 8,
    Ohio State (21-12) 7, Marquette (24-8) 7, Central
    Michigan (23-7) 7, Troy (25-4) 1, Stony Brook (28-3) 1,
    Duke (18-12) 1.
    The USA Today Sports Board of Coaches is made up of 32
    head coaches at Division I institutions. All are members
    of the Women’s Basketball Coaches Association.


COLLEGE BASKETBALL

FINAL AP MEN’S TOP 25 POLL
REcoRd PTS PVS


  1. Kansas (63) 28-3 1,623 1

  2. Gonzaga (1) 31-2 1,547 2

  3. Dayton (1) 29-2 1,505 3

  4. Florida State 26-5 1,381 4

  5. Baylor 26-4 1,337 5

  6. San Diego State 30-2 1,279 6

  7. Creighton 24-7 1,154 7

  8. Kentucky 25-6 1,118 8

  9. Michigan State 22-9 1,023 9

  10. Villanova 24-7 1,011 11

  11. Duke 25-6 990 10

  12. Maryland 22-9 924 12

  13. Oregon 24-7 892 13

  14. Louisville 24-7 768 15

  15. Seton Hall 21-9 727 16

  16. Virginia 23-7 586 17

  17. Wisconsin 21-10 539 18

  18. Brigham Young 24-8 537 14

  19. Ohio State 21-10 459 19

  20. Auburn 25-6 453 20

  21. Illinois 21-10 263 21

  22. Houston 23-8 179 22

  23. Butler 22-9 165 24

  24. West Virginia 21-10 159 22

  25. Iowa 20-11 109 25
    o thers receiving votes: Stephen F. Austin 78, East
    Tennessee State 66, Providence 63, Michigan 62, Utah
    State 36, Saint Mary’s 33, Penn State 21, Arizona 7,
    Rutgers 6, Richmond 6, USC 4, New Mexico State 4,
    Texas Tech 3, UCLA 2, Vermont 2, Purdue 1, Belmont 1,
    Liberty 1, Utah 1.


FINAL AP WOMEN’S TOP 25 POLL
REcoRd PTS PVS


  1. South Carolina (26) 32-1 746 1

  2. Oregon (4) 31-2 724 2

  3. Baylor 28-2 676 3

  4. Maryland 28-4 654 4

  5. Connecticut 29-3 642 5

  6. Louisville 28-4 588 6

  7. Stanford 27-6 560 7

  8. North Carolina S tate 28-4 543 8

  9. Mississippi State 27-6 505 9

  10. UCLA 26-5 501 10

  11. Northwestern 26-4 394 12

  12. Arizona 24-7 385 13

  13. Gonzaga 28-3 359 11

  14. Oregon State 23-9 321 14

  15. DePaul 28-5 298 15

  16. Kentucky 22-8 283 16

  17. South Dakota 30-2 259 17

  18. Texas A&M 22-8 246 19

  19. Florida State 24-8 239 18

  20. Indiana 24-8 194 20

  21. Iowa 23-7 174 21

  22. Princeton 26-1 163 22

  23. Missouri State 26-4 121 23

  24. Arkansas 24-8 97 24

  25. Arizona State 20-11 31 25
    others receiving votes: TCU 11, Ohio State 10, Boston
    College 6, Marquette 5, Rutgers 4, Florida Gulf Coast 3,
    Texas 2, Iowa State 2, Boise State 2, Duke 1, Central
    Michigan 1.


NBA lEAdERS
Through Wednesday, March 11
ScoRING GFGFTPTS AVG
Harden, HOU ...................... 61603 619 2,096 34.4
Beal, WAS .......................... 57593 385 1,741 30.5
Antetokounmpo, MIL ........ 57623 361 1,690 29.6
Young, ATL ........................ 60546 481 1,778 29.6
Lillard, POR ........................ 58531 389 1,677 28.9
Doncic, DAL ........................ 54512 369 1,549 28.7
Westbrook, HOU ............... 53568 269 1,456 27.5
Leonard, .AC ...................... 51476 311 1,370 26.9
Davis, LAL .......................... 55508 386 1,467 26.7
Booker, PHX ....................... 62544 405 1,619 26.1
James, LAL ........................ 60586 239 1,544 25.7
LaVine, CHI ........................ 60539 268 1,530 25.5
Ingram, NO ........................ 56469 283 1,358 24.3
Mitchell, UTA ..................... 63560 249 1,525 24.2
Siakam, TOR ...................... 53459 220 1,253 23.6
Tatum, BOS ....................... 59499 225 1,390 23.6
McCollum, POR .................. 62549 123 1,395 22.5
FIEld GoAlS FG FGA PcT
Robinson, NY ................................. 253 341 .742
Gobert, UTA .................................. 353 506 .698
Allen, BKN ..................................... 267 413 .646
Capela, HOU .................................. 244 388 .629
Clarke, MEM .................................. 254 408 .623
Whiteside, POR ............................. 418 676 .618
Adams, OKC .................................. 262 443 .591
Valanciunas, MEM ........................ 385 657 .586
Simmons, PHI ............................... 361 617 .585
Collins, ATL ................................... 353 605 .583
Harrell, LAC ................................... 471 812 .580
Adebayo, MIA ............................... 408 719 .567
Wood, DET .................................... 288 508 .567
Ayton, PHX .................................... 255 465 .548
THREE-PoINTERS 3FG 3FGA PcT
Hill, MIL ........................................... 73152 .480
Curry, DAL ..................................... 136 300 .453
Redick, NO ..................................... 156 345 .452
Robinson, MIA .............................. 243 543 .448
McDermott, IND ............................ 118 265 .445
Morris, NY ..................................... 116 264 .439
Olynyk, MIA .................................... 80185 .432
Bertans, WAS ............................... 200 472 .424
Bjelica, SAC ................................... 125 295 .424
Holiday, IND .................................. 122 288 .424
Middleton, MIL .............................. 133 318 .418
Niang, UTA ...................................... 77185 .416
Korver, MIL ..................................... 86207 .415
Bogdanovic, UTA ........................... 189 457 .414
Thomas, WAS ................................. 78189 .413
FREE THRoWS FT FTA PcT
Wanamaker, BOS .......................... 108 116 .931
Booker, PHX .................................. 405 442 .916
Middleton, MIL .............................. 178 196 .908
Bogdanovic, UTA ........................... 250 277 .903
Redick, NO ..................................... 147 163 .902
Paul, OKC ....................................... 225 250 .900
Burks, GS ....................................... 201 224 .897
Brogdon, IND ................................. 145 162 .895
Murray, DEN .................................. 158 177 .893
Leonard, LAC ................................. 311 350 .889
Lillard, POR ................................... 389 438 .888
Gallinari, OKC ................................ 234 264 .886

NHl lEAdERS
Through Wednesday, March 11
GoAlS GP G
Alex Ovechkin, Washington ................................ 68 48
David Pastrnak, Boston ....................................... 70 48
Auston Matthews, Toronto................................. 70 47
Leon Draisaitl, Edmonton .................................... 71 43
Mika Zibanejad, N.Y. Rangers ............................. 57 41
Sebastian Aho, Carolina ...................................... 68 38
Kyle Connor, Winnipeg ........................................ 71 38
Jack Eichel, Buffalo.............................................. 68 36
Nathan MacKinnon, Colorado .............................. 69 35
Connor McDavid, Edmonton ................................ 64 34
Patrick Kane, Chicago .......................................... 70 33
Nikita Kucherov, Tampa Bay ............................... 68 33
Max Pacioretty, Vegas......................................... 71 32
Artemi Panarin, N.Y. Rangers ............................. 69 32
Patrice Bergeron, Boston .................................... 61 31
William Nylander, Toronto .................................. 68 31
Free download pdf