The Rules of Contagion

(Greg DeLong) #1

  1. Lum K. and Isaac W., ‘To predict and serve?’ Significance, 7
    October 2016.

  2. Quotes from author interview with Kristian Lum, January 2018.

  3. Perry W.L. et al., ‘Predictive Policing’, RAND Corporation
    Report, 2013.

  4. Whitty C.J.M., ‘What makes an academic paper useful for
    health policy?’, BMC Medicine, 2015.

  5. Dumke M. and Main F., ‘A look inside the watch list Chicago
    police fought to keep secret’, Associated Press, 18 June 2017.

  6. Background on SSL algorithm: Posadas B., ‘How strategic is
    Chicago’s “Strategic Subjects List”? Upturn investigates’,
    Medium, 22 June 2017; Asher J. and Arthur R., ‘Inside the
    Algorithm That Tries to Predict Gun Violence in Chicago’, New
    York Times, 13 June 2017; Kunichoff Y. and Sier P., ‘The
    Contradictions of Chicago Police’s Secretive List’, Chicago
    Magazine, 21 August 2017.

  7. According to Posadas (Medium, 2017), proportion high risk:
    287,404/398,684 = 0.72. 88,592 of these (31 per cent) have
    never been arrested or a victim of crime.

  8. Hemenway D., While We Were Sleeping: Success Stories in
    Injury and Violence Prevention, (University of California Press,
    2009).

  9. Background on broken windows approach: Kelling G.L. and
    Wilson J.Q., ‘Broken Windows’, The Atlantic, March 1982;
    Harcourt B.E. and Ludwig J., ‘Broken Windows: New Evidence
    from New York City and a Five-City Social Experiment’, University
    of Chicago Law Review, 2005.

  10. Childress S., ‘The Problem with “Broken Windows” Policing’,
    Public Broadcasting Service, 28 June 2016.

  11. Keizer K. et al., ‘The Spreading of Disorder’, Science, 2008.

Free download pdf