Financial Times Europe 18Mar2020

(WallPaper) #1

14 ★ FINANCIAL TIMES Wednesday18 March 2020


COMPANIES


I


n a cash crisis, one of the straightest lines that a global


investor can draw tracks the expanding cash piles of


corporate Japan at the end of each fiscal year. Forfour


decades,this line of retained earnings has advanced


relentlessly to itsrecordlevel of about 130 per cent of


GDP at the end of 2019.


No corporate base anywherein the worldhas saved this


assiduously for a rainy day — or been criticised so consist-


ently by foreign shareholders for doing so.


No one shouldbe as wellplacednow that the rainy day


hasarrived.


Cash, says everyoneat times like these, is king.Yet


there is apparently no reward at the point of coronation.


Japan’s companies have been hit just as hard as everyone


else’s, with the Topix down 27 per cent in the year to


date.Corporate Japan’s cash-rich outrage may be silent,


but it is palpable.


For a picture ofhow far Japanese companies stand


apart from the rest of the world, brokers like to


comparethe Topix, in which 52 per cent of non-financial


companies are net cash, with


otherbenchmarks.


In Germany, home to the


next biggest collection of


cash hoarders, almost 33 per


cent of companies in the


CDAX went into this crisis


net cash. For the FTSE All-


share, MSCI Euro and S&P


500, the ratios were 16.5 per


cent, 16 per cent and 14 per cent, respectively.


The appeal of such comparisons, for brokers trying to


sell Japanese stocks, is that it supplies two reasons why an


investor should buy.


Japanese companies collectively havethe world’s biggest


cushion in times of financial trauma. In recent years, they


havehad the biggest reservesto fund share buybacks if


management teams can bepersuaded to deploy themin


the name of better governance and higher return on


equity. Record successive years of buybacks suggest that


somehave yielded to that pressure.


But the broad problem — and the reasonJapanstocks are


so prone to disappointinginvestors —isthemindset


underpinning the cash piles. Over many years, Japanese


companies have learnt how to justify withholding those


whopping accumulations of cash from shareholders. They


cite successiveshocks — from oil prices in the 1970s and


the bursting of the property bubble in the 1980s to the


Asian crisis in the 1990s and the collapse of Lehman Broth-


ers in the 2000s — to prove the thudding regularitypro-


vided by wads of cash.


They haveconsistently rejected the idea of shareholder


primacy among stakeholders, arguing that they are bound


neither by law, morality nor


best practice to reward


shareholdersabove all other


stakeholders. The tactichas


always been to cast the


inherent short-termism of


investors, real or imagined,


against the Japanese corpo-


rate virtue of long-termism.


Companies havebeen able


to point to the inconsistency of outsiders.


The graph of Japan’s advancing retained earnings may


be arrow-straight, but global investment philosophy has


swayed around it. Last yeartheBusiness Roundtable in the


USrevised its definitionof the primary purpose of a com-


pany to state thatit shouldbenefit all stakeholders: cus-


tomers, employees, suppliers and communities. Japanese


companies, after years of being hammered by investors for


maintaining thatline, could feelvindication.


In reality,both of these justifications are a disguise.


Listed Japanese companies, according to WisdomTree


senior adviser Jesper Koll and others, see their true pur-


pose as increasing cash ingood times and bad. They


achieve that, despite the claims about duty to all stake-


holders, by aggressively raising and lowering wages and


investment according to the prevailing cycle.


If that is correct, thosecash piles tell us a great deal about


the true motivation behind governance in Japan and, by


extension, its vulnerability to alternative ideas pressed


upon it by shareholders. The vast stash of retained earn-


ings sitting in the Topix may offer survivability to the


immediate credit-related shock of a crisis. And that is no


small thing.


But the Topix will only become more attractive thanless


cash-rich peersif, after the shock, Japanese companies can


prove, against decades of form,that they are able to use


that rainy-day money to become the first out of the blocks


post-crisis to reward shareholders.


[email protected]


INSIDE BUSINESS


ASIA


Leo


Lewis


Japan Inc vindicated


over importance of


saving for a rainy day


No corporate


base has saved


this assiduously


or been criticised


so much for it


E M I KO T E R A ZO N O A N D L E S L I E H O O K


LONDON


Impossible Foodshas raised $500m in


a round that will help the US plant-


based burger group to weather the


economic turmoil caused by the coro-


naviruscrisis.


David Lee, chief financial officer, said


the company needed to prepare for the


impact of the coronavirus outbreak.


“It’s too early to tell what changes


among our customers and consumers


will affect our business, but we will be


able to withstand any short-term


shocks,” he said.


The fundraising, which was led by


South Korea’sMirae Asset Global


Investments, and also supported by


Li Ka-shing’sHorizons Ventures, Singa-


pore’sTemasekandKhosla Ventures,


closed last week and comes as several


US states have moved to shut restau-


rants and food service outlets.


The capital increasecomes amid the


backdrop of instability in the financial


markets. Impossible Foods did not dis-


close its valuation, but its rivalBeyond


Meat, which floated last year, has lost


about half its value from a month ago,


trading at $61.80 a shareyesterday.


Although demand for food is


expected to be affectedat retailers, with


restaurant footfall forecast to fall


sharply, “the impact on Beyond Meat


and Impossible Foods will be huge,” said


one investor in Beyond Meat.


The capital increase also comes as the


company is pushing into new markets


and has applied for regulatory approval


in the EU, China and other Asian mar-


kets. It currently sells its patties in the


US, Singapore, Hong Kong and Macau.


Impossible Foods said it would also


use the funds for R&D and the commer-


cialisation of its plant-basedpork prod-


ucts. Pat Brown,chief executive, said


late last year that while the company


had no plans for an imminent public


offering, it had the option to do so as it


had already done much of the legwork.


Food & beverage


Impossible raises $500m from Asia backers


ST E P H E N M O R R I S , O L A F STO R B E C K
A N D N I C H O L A S M E G AW

European bankers are trying to calm


fearsof an incipient financial crisis


after steep drops in their securitiesin


the past two weeks, reflecting growing


concernaboutcoronavirusfallout.


Ana Botín, executive chairman of


Santander, saidyesterday that the euro-


zone’s largest lenderwas forecasting


only a 5 per cent drop in earnings this


yearandexpected no impact on its capi-


tal level or mid-term financial targets.


Speaking at the Morgan Stanley Euro-


pean financial services conference,Ms


Botín said the bank’s estimates for one


possibility were based on aV-shaped


scenario, while the lender was “well


positioned to withstand even a severe


stress scenario”.


European and British bank stocks


have dropped more than 40 per cent


this month to the lowest level since


the 1990s.


Loss-absorbing bonds have plunged,


and the cost of insuring bank debt


throughswaps has soared.


Deutsche Bank,whose shares have


more than halvedsince February,is also


seeking to reassure investors.


“I am not underestimating the seri-


ousness of the situation, but thankGod


we did the heavy lifting in 2019,” said


oneDeutsche executive, referring to


the largestrestructuringin its 150-year


historyannounced in July.


Deutschestood by its 2020 targets


on capital, leverage and costs, and


wason track to meet its medium-


term revenue and return objectives,the


executive said.


“Our strong view is that this is more


than likely to be a shortlived crisis than


a long one.”


Some large institutional investors


were not persuaded.


“I think Deutsche has a massive prob-


lem, and a profit warning may just be a


matter of time,” said one of its institu-


tional shareholders.


Financials


Banks attempt to allay fears of a financial crisis


TA N YA P OW L E Y— LONDON


JA M I E S M Y T H— SYDNEY
R I C H A R D M I L N E— OSLO


Theairline industry will need up to


$200bn in emergency support to


weathercoronavirusfallout, as the


majority of carriers face running out of


money within two months, itsmain


trade body has warned.


The International Air Transport


Association saidyesterday that thebulk


of carrierswere facing a cash crisis as


governments’ attempts to contain the


virustriggered ahalt intravel.


“Only 30 airlines drove the improve-


ment in profitability that we saw in the


last10 years,” said Brian Pearce, chief


economist at Iata. “Obviously there are


a number of airlines that are in a much


stronger position to weather this lack of


revenues, but the majority are in a very


fragile place.”


TheIataoutlook comes a day after a


large number of airlines grounded most


of their fleetand announced plans to lay


off thousands of staff as they confront a


crisis that executives say dwarfs previ-


ous periods of turmoil.


Moody’syesterday loweredratings for


many European airlines.It said it was


cutting the long-term rating ofeasyJetto


Baa2, whileLufthansawas reduced to


Baa1.British Airways’ Baa3 long-term


rating was put under review for a down-


grade, as was that ofparentIAG.


Thecrisis has prompted airlines to


turn to governments.


Carrierswould need between $150bn


and $200bn in cash injections as well as


loan guarantees, Iatasaid.Its previous


worst-case scenario, made just over a


week ago, that the industry could be hit


with losses of up to $113bn was


“undoubtedly” too lowafter the virtual


closure of the North Atlantic market.


It is expected to make revised esti-


mates next week.


In the UK, the Foreign Officeyester-


day advised the public against all


non-essential travel globally for the next


30 days.


Tim Alderslade, chief executive of


Airlines UK, a trade body, said the move


would bring “yet more devastation to


the airline and wider travel industries”.


The USindustry has already called for


$50bn in emergency support. Airlines


for America, thebody that represents


the largest USairlines includingUnited,


DeltaandAmerican, said on Monday


that it wanted the government to pro-


vide $25bn of loans and $25bn of grants.


The organisation warned that all


seven of its members that carry passen-


gers would run out of money before the


end of the year if the crisis continued.


Australiawill unveil a A$715m rescue


for the domestic airline industrytoday.


The package involves the refunding and


waiving of government charges, includ-


ing aviation fuel excise.


Yesterday Regional Expresswarned it


would not surviveunlessCanberra


stepped in withmeasuresincluding a


state guarantee over new loans.


QantasandVirgin Australiahave


said that they have enough cash


reserves to survive the crisis, though


Virgin has more than A$5bn net debt on


its balance sheet.


Norwegian politicians are discussing


potential airline nationalisations and


other measures.


Norwegian Air Shuttleis seen as one


of Europe’s most vulnerable airlinesdue


toits high debt burden.


Additional reporting by Myles McCormick


Travel & leisure


Airlines appeal for $200bn lifeline


Iata says most carriers


face running out of cash


within two months


They have


consistently


rejected the idea


of shareholder


primacy


L AU R E N I N DV I K


Lanvinchief executiveJean-Philippe


Hecquetis to leave the French fashion


house owned byFosun International


afterjust18months.


His departure is effective immediately,


the company saidyesterday. Joann


Cheng, chairman of Fosun’s fashion unit


and Lanvin, is stepping into the role of


interim chief executive, overseeing the


brand’s strategy and operations until a


successor is announced.


“We will continue to work together


with the management team to ensure


that Lanvin has the right capital and


strategy to succeed,” Ms Cheng said.


His departure comes just as Lanvin,


which was acquired by Chinese con-


glomerate Fosun for €120m in 2018,


appeared to be hitting its stride.


Mr Hecquethired Bruno Sialelli, the


former men’s creative director of


LVMH-ownedLoewe, in January 2019,


and his women’s and men’s collections


have been well-received by critics and


buyers. Lydia King, fashion and buying


director ofHarrods, noted Lanvin was


one of her top buys for the Autumn/


Winter 2020 season that recently


showed in Paris.


At the time of the acquisition, Fosun


pledged to invest more than €100m in


Lanvin, the longest continuously run-


ning couture house in France and one of


the few legacy European luxury brands


under Chinese ownership.


Mr Hecquet told Vogue Business last


year that revenues had finally returned


to growth after struggling in the after-


math of designer Alber Elbaz’s depar-


ture in 2015.


The company has been concentrating


its growth efforts in China, where it


opened three stores last year and which


Mr Hecquet said could make up 35 to 40


per cent of sales. Ms Chengtold the


Financial Timeslast year the brand was


looking to raise a further $100m by sell-


ing a minority stake to outside inves-


tors.


Prior to joining Lanvin, Mr Hecquet


was chief executive of French contem-


porary brandSandrofrom 2014 to 2018.


He was one of several high-profile


appointments Fosun made at its fashion


companies over the past two years.


Retail


Lanvin chief


Hecquet


exits after


18 months


Mulberrycreative director Johnny


Coca is to leave the upmarket British


handbag maker this month after five


years at the company.


The Aim-listedgroup’s shares fell 17


per cent after the announcement


yesterday. The stock has fallen 83 per


cent over the past two years as the


progress of its four-pillar turnround


strategy — spanning product, brand,


omnichannel and operations — has


stalled. Its market value has


fallen from a peak of £1.47bn


in May 2012 to roughly


£72m.


Losses widened to £9.9m


on the back of sales of


£68.9m last year, a slight


decline from the £9.1m loss


and £68.3m revenues posted


in 2018.Global revenues,


led by Asia, grew in


the double-digitsbut


were offset by a 4 per


cent decline in the


UK.


Mulberry, which was founded in


1971, has suffered from the tough


trading conditions on the UK high


street and was hit when department


store chain House of Fraser went into


administration before being bought.


The brand is a significant supplier to


House of Fraser and also has a number


of concessions in its stores. It was


forced to write off roughly £3m when


the chain entered administration in


2018, before being acquired byFrasers


Group, the conglomerate owned by


retail billionaireMike Ashley.


Last month, Frasers, bought astake


in Mulberryworth roughly £20m at


the time.


Neil Saunders, managing director


and retail analyst at GlobalData Retail,


described Coca’s departure as a loss


that only added to existing problems.


“While there is no doubt that Johnny


Coca has injected some newness into


Mulberry’s collections, the company


still has a lot to prove,” he said. “It


needs to make more efforts to stand


out and appeal to a younger


generation.”


Mr Coca, a Paris-educated Spaniard


who began his career dressing store


windows for Louis Vuitton, joined


Mulberry in 2015 fromCéline, where


he was director of accessories.


He replaced Emma Hill, who left in


2013 after efforts to take the brand


further upmarket by then-chief


executiveBruno Guillonled to


falling sales and three profit


warnings, shaving two-thirds off


Mulberry’s market value between


2012 and 2014. Mr Guillon left in


2014 after just two years and was


succeeded byThierry Andretta.


During his tenure, Mr Coca


introduced a 1970s-inspired logo for


the houseandlaunched handbags


including the Amberley and Iris —


neither of which achieved the


success of his earlier designs for


Céline. He also rolled out new


categories including eyewear and


sneakers, oversaw the relaunch of


men’s accessories and jewellery, and


brieflyreturned Mulberryto the


London Fashion Week show


schedule with a refreshed women’s


ready-to-wear offering, which later


transitioned into smaller twice


yearly presentations in Paris.


“We continue to focus on our


strategy to build Mulberry as a


global luxury brand,” Mr Andretta


said in a statement.


“We remain committed to


developing responsible, innovative


products, underpinned by a strong


in-house creative team and our


international direct-to-customer


omnichannel business model.”


Lauren Indvik


Stepping down


Creative head


exits Mulberry


A Mulberry handbag on display at London Fashion Week in 2016 and, below, outgoing creative director Johnny Coca— Niklas Halle’n/AFP


Moody’s cut


ratings for


easyJet and


Lufthansa


while BA


was put


under


review for a


downgrade


His departure comesjust


as Lanvin, acquired by


Fosun in 2018, appeared


to be hitting its stride


MARCH 18 2020 Section:Companies Time: 17/3/2020-18:34 User:andrea.crisp Page Name:CONEWS1, Part,Page,Edition:USA, 14 , 1

Free download pdf