Financial Times Europe 18Mar2020

(WallPaper) #1

Wednesday18 March 2020 ★ FINANCIAL TIMES 21


MARKETS & INVESTING


P H I L I P STA F F O R D— LONDON
DAV I D K E O H A N E— PARIS

Four European countries have applied


temporary bans on betting against the


prices of a range of sharesto try to calm


markets shaken by coronavirus.


France, Italy, Spain and Belgium said


overnight they would move to stop the


short selling of hundreds of stocks listed


on their markets. European markets


staged a briefrebound in early morning


trade in Europe, before giving up the


gains by lunch time.


The practice of short selling involves


investors borrowing shares and then


selling them, hoping to buy them back


later at a lower price before returning


them and pocketing the difference. The


practice has been blamed for exacerbat-


ing volatility during times of stress.


The Autorité des Marchés Financiers,


the French regulator, said its ban would


cover 92 stocks and would last a day. It


applies to many of France’s blue-chip


stocks such as Air France-KLM, BNP


Paribas and Renault, but also many


small and mid-cap stocks. Finance min-


ister Bruno Le Maire praised the deci-


sionyesterday, and said the ban could


be extended, as markets staged a mod-


est recovery.


By mid-afternoon the CAC 40 index


was down about 0.3 per cent, having


shed more than 5 per cent on Monday.


“It’s a good decision and it’s a neces-


sary decision,” said Mr Le Maire. “We


are ready to go further, we are ready to


go up to a month, and it’s a decision


taken at the European level. We want to


avoid speculation on the markets.”


The minister added: “The French


banks are hit on the market but they are


very solid. [They] have the necessary


capitalisation to be solid.” Shares in


lenders BNP Paribas and Société Géné-


rale have halved so far this year.


In a statement late on Monday, Spain’s


regulator said its ban for all Spanish


stocks would last for a month, and the


prohibition might be extended if


needed.


It cited the extreme volatility in Euro-


pean markets, and the state of emer-


gency that was declared by the Spanish


government over the weekend. The ban


will extend to derivatives that involve


creating a short position.


Consob, the Italian regulator,


restricted short selling on 20 of Italy’s


biggest companies forthe day yester-


day. Its list consists of mainly banks and


insurance companies such as UniCredit


and Mediobanca, but also includes Fiat


Chrysler and Telecom Italia. The ban on


17 Belgian stocks will also last for one


day.


European rules allow national regula-


tors to apply a temporary EU-wide ban


if there are falls of more than 10 per cent


for the most actively traded shares, or


20 per cent or more for less liquid


shares.


Equities


France, Spain, Italy and Belgium ban


short selling in effort to restore calm


R O B E RT S M I T H A N D CY N T H I A O ’ M U R C H U
LONDON

Morningstar has placed one ofH2O


Asset Management’s flagship funds


under review, a decision theinvest-


ment rating agency said stemmed from


management’s “repeated failures to


manage risk effectively”.


London-based H2O, a subsidiary of


French bankNatixis, has emerged as


one of thehighest-profile victimsof the


recent market rout, with several of its


bond funds recording lossesof more


than 50 per centin a matter of weeks.


Yesterday Morningstar said it was


placing one of these funds — H2O Alle-


gro — on review for a downgrade after


“extreme losses”, citing its 18 per cent


and 25 per cent daily falls last Monday


and Thursday respectively. Allegro,


which focuses on bonds and currencies,


imposednew feesfor investors last


month as its assets hit €1.6bn, a level


that the firm said was “approaching its


management capacity limit”.


Matias Mottolaat Morningstar said


the recent losses “raise further concerns


over the effectiveness of the fund’s risk


management process”, and described


the “derailment” from its volatility tar-


gets as “alarming”.


A spokesperson said H2O “has a


robust risk management framework in


place and the firm has reduced signifi-


cantly its exposures across its portfo-


lios”, and added: “Risks must be


assessed with regards to the investment


horizon of each fund which, in the case


of H2O Allegro, is three years.”


Last June, Morningstarsuspended its


ratingon Allegro after the Financial


Times detailedH2O’silliquid bond


holdings linked to financier Lars Wind-


horst, who iswell-knownin his native


Germany for his legal troubles.


When Morningstar resumed the rat-


ing, itdowngradedthe Allegro fund to


“neutral” — its second-lowest rating,


ahead of “negative” — citing H2O’s


“loose risk controls”. The fund rating


agency also directly questioned the


“robustness” of valuations of the Wind-


horst-linked bonds.


H2O’s chief executiveBruno Crastes


last year described the resumption of


the rating as a “significant vote of confi-


dence”.


At the height of the fallout arising


from H2O’s illiquid debt exposures last


summer, when investorspulled about


€8bnfrom its funds, Mr Crastes vowed


to“never” halt redemptions, which


allow investors to withdrawmoney on a


daily basis. H2O managed about €30bn


of assets at the start of2020.


Mr Crastes’ comments prompted Paul


Myners, the former City minister, to


submit a writtenquestion to UK parlia-


mentasking the government and the


financial regulator if they approved of


this statement. Last week Lord Myners


returned to that theme,askingwhat


plans the government had to investigate


H2O’s “risk control strategies and exec-


utive leadership” in light of thelosses.


H2O’s troubles have fed through to its


parent, Natixis, which in Novem-


berunveiled measuresaimed at rein-


forcing its risk management.


Natixis declined to comment on


Morningstar’s action.


Asset management


Morningstar flags ‘repeated failures’ at


H2O and puts fund rating under review


H2O ‘has a robust risk


management framework


in place and the firm has


reduced... its exposures’


France’s short-selling ban included


blue-chip stocks such as BNP Paribas


FastFT


Our global


team gives you


market-moving


news and views,


24 hours a day


ft.com/fastft


P H I L I P STA F F O R D— LONDON


As worries over coronavirus sweep


through markets, generating sharpvol-


atility, some regulators are beginning to


push for trading to becurtailed.


They fear thatswings in prices have


become disorderly and institutions with


depleted workforces cannot cope with


heavy volumes.


“We absolutely believe in keeping the


markets open,” Steven Mnuchin, US


Treasury secretary said yesterday. “We


may get to a point where we shorten the


hours if that’s something they need to


do.”


Australian regulators on Monday told


the most active traders on the country’s


equitymarketsthat they would have to


trade significantly less, as higher vol-


umes would put brokers and the


exchange itself under strain.


The Philippine Stock Exchange,


meanwhile,was to be closed from yes-


terday afterRodrigo Duterte, the Philip-


pine president, placed the country’s


largest island of Luzon into an


“enhanced community quarantine”.


The moves raise the question of


whether trading should be more


broadly shutin response to the corona-


virus crisis.


Jay Clayton, chair of the US Securities


and Exchange Commission, told CNBC


on Mondaythat he was not in favour.


“Markets should continue to function


in times like this,” he said. The Financial


Conduct Authority, the UK financial


regulator, appears to agree.


“Our aim is to continue to maintain


open and orderly markets notwith-


standing current volatility,” it said.


Are there precedents for shutting
exchanges?

Yes, but shutdowns are rare and have


tended to be brief, connected mostly to


particular problems in the vicinity of


exchanges.


The London Stock Exchange last


closed for trading in 1987 when storms


prevented thousands of traders from


getting into the city. The New York


Stock Exchange and Nasdaq closed in


October 2012 to prepare for Superstorm


Sandy, andshut for several days after


9/11, when communication cables and


offices were damaged.


Such examples illustrate that a


critical mass of people was once needed


to be in a particularsite, at one time, for


markets to function. These days, the


nature of trading has changed, and


humans have been cut out of the process


to a large extent.


Most deals on equity, futures and cur-


rency markets are executed automati-


cally by computers on servers in data


centres.


Still, traders say the shift to operating


remotely such as at disaster recovery


sites andat homeis exacerbating pock-


ets of poor liquidity.


Not all shutdowns have been caused


by logistical problems. In Greece in


2015, the Athens stock exchange was


closed for five weeks following the


imposition of capital controls, along


with bond and derivatives markets and


clearing and settlement houses.


How have bourses stayed open


until now?


Many have been activating their busi-


ness continuity plans. Companies such


as the London Stock Exchange, Nasdaq


and Intercontinental Exchange have


split their staff into those working


remotely, from home, or on call for cer-


tain critical operations such as surveil-


lance and technology. Ancillary serv-


ices,have beentruncated or cancelled.


CME, CBOE Global Markets and Nas-


daq have closed theiropen outcrypits


foroptions,though they continue to


operate these markets electronically. So


far most exchanges’ operations have


held upand reported few problems.


Changes have been brought in to ease


the stress.The London Stock Exchange


has eased the bands by which market


makers, normally banks or high-fre-


quency traders, are able to quote prices


to buy and sell some securities.


That will allow them to offer more


attractive prices toparticipants, and


persuade them not leave the market


when it seems too risky. The European


Securities and Markets Authority has


tightened rules around disclosures for


short selling securities.


What is the benefit of closing?


In practical terms, it would lessen the


strain on exchanges and the brokers


who use them, potentially reducing the


scope for market accidents on top ofan


economic and public health crisis.


This is what regulators in Australia


have sought to pre-empt. As Guy


Warren, chief executive of ITRS, a UK


trading technology provider explained:


“Without the right capacity planning


tools, it is extremely difficult to identify


what the pinch point is for an IT system


and when it is going to happen.”


What is the downside?


Stocks, bonds, exchange traded funds


and futures are traded across borders, in


markets that are highly interlinked.


Trading in FTSE 100 stocks, for exam-


ple,clusters on theLSE, but futures on


components of that index are more active


on ICE Futures Europe. UK-listed compa-


nies are also part of the Euro Stoxx 600


index, which is traded in Germany.


Morning trading in Europe, mean-


while, isinfluenced by the price ofeMini


futures contracts, which are traded in


Chicago.Unless all thosevenues are


shutsimultaneously, traders will go to


sites that are open and liquid. Oneoffi-


cial said the result would be “a mess”.


Shutting markets couldmake matters


worse once they reopen. WhenAthens


reopened after its hiatus five years ago,


itfell one-fifth. Shutting markets could


prevent investors from getting out of


sliding shares while their assets retain


some value. Some funds, of course, also


profit when asset prices fall.


Stacey Cunningham, president of the


New York Stock Exchange, on Monday


said that it was “important” for markets


to remain openand that closing them


would only compoundanxieties.


“[It would] not change the underlying


causes of the market decline, would


remove transparency into investor sen-


timent, and reduce investors’ access to


their money,” shetweeted.


SEC chief favours continued


functioning but global staffing


is being hit by coronavirus


‘It is


extremely


difficult to


identify


what the


pinch point


is for an IT


system’


Regulators fear


price swings


have become


disorderly and


institutions with


depleted


workforces


cannot cope


with heavy


volumes
Toby Melville/Reuters

Equities.Volatility


Watchdogs weigh up costs and


benefits of exchange shutdowns


E VA SZ A L AY— LONDON
C O L BY S M I T H— NEW YORK

Companies and banks are hoarding


dollars to paydebts and keep business


flowing during thecoronaviruspan-


demic, helping to send the currency


higher.


A collapse in revenues, seized-up debt


markets andfears over the economic


impact of Covid-19 have all encouraged


companies to max out their credit lines


to keep large amounts of cash at hand.


The US Federal Reserve has stepped


in, seeking to enhance flows around the


world’s financial system by lowering the


cost of borrowing dollars through swap


lines. Such facilities, set up with the cen-


tral banks of Japan, Europe, the UK,


Canada and Switzerland, allow cheap


access to dollars.


But the pressure is not abating, say


analysts. The dollar has pushed higher


against its peers this month, despite two


US central bank emergency cutsthat


have brought interest rates down to


zero. Ordinarily, rate reductions of this


magnitude would weaken a currency.


“When you have the most unexpected


recession we’ve seen in modern times, a


lot of people are caught in dollar-fund-


ing issues,” said Paul Meggyesi, head of


FX strategy at JPMorgan in London.


“This crisis is affecting every sector and


every country in a synchronised way.”


Yesterday one key measure of dollar


demand doubled, as the so-called


cross-currency basis between the euro


and dollar moved from -60 basis points


to roughly -120bp at one point. On the


day the dollar gained at least 1 per cent


against each of the other G10 currencies.


George Saravelos, the global head of


FX research at Deutsche Bank, said


banks are also hoarding dollars, as they


worry about companies defaulting on


debts they have or asking to borrow


more. Thishas meant that the cost of


dollar funding keepsrising, despite the


sweeping measures taken by the Fed.


“We underestimated how acute dollar


funding pressures would become”,


added Mr Saravelos. “We worry that fix-


ing this dollar shortage may be more dif-


ficult than policymakers think.”


When fears over coronavirus started


tohit markets, the dollar did not climb.


Despite itsreputation as a haven in


times of stress andas the world’s pre-


eminentreserve currency, it defied


expectations by ticking lower at the end


of February and beginning of March.


But theevents last week — with a


crash in the oil price, some of the biggest


declines in stocks for decades, and


alarming strains in theUS government


bond market — finally sent the dollar on


its biggest rally in almost five years.


In the week of March 9, the pound lost


nearly 6.5 per cent against the dollar


while the Mexican peso and the Russian


roubleslumped 5 per cent.


See Lex


Currencies


Bank hoarding


and fears over


Covid-19 push


dollar higher


‘We worry that fixing


this dollar shortage may


be more difficult than


policymakers think’


MARCH 18 2020 Section:Markets Time: 17/3/2020-17:48 User:andy.puttnam Page Name:MARKETS1, Part,Page,Edition:EUR, 21 , 1

Free download pdf