814 Part Ten Mergers, Corporate Control, and Governance
bre44380_ch31_813-842.indd 814 10/09/15 09:33 PM
◗ FIGURE 31.1
The number of mergers
in the United States,
1962–2013.
Source: Mergerstat,
http://www.mergerstat.com.
196219651968197119741977198019831986198919921995199820012004200720102013
Number of deals
0
2000
4000
6000
8000
10000
12000
14000
We proceed as follows.
• Motives. Sources of value added.
• Dubious motives. Don’t be tempted.
• Benefits and costs. It’s important to estimate them
consistently.
• Mechanics. Legal, tax, and accounting issues.
• Takeover battles and tactics. We look at merger tactics and
show some of the economic forces driving merger activity.
• Mergers and the economy. How can we explain merger
waves? Who gains and who loses as a result of mergers?
Mergers are partly about economies from combining two
firms, but they are also about who gets to run the company.
Pick a merger, and you’ll almost always find that one firm is
the protagonist and the other is the target. The top manage-
ment of the target firm usually departs after the merger.
Financial economists now view mergers as part of a
broader market for corporate control. The activity in this
market goes far beyond ordinary mergers. It includes lever-
aged buyouts (LBOs), spin-offs and divestitures, and also
nationalizations and privatizations where the government
acquires or sells a business. These are the subject of the
next chapter.
Mergers can be horizontal, vertical, or conglomerate. A horizontal merger is one that takes
place between two firms in the same line of business. All of the mergers listed in Table 31.1
are horizontal.
A vertical merger involves companies at different stages of production. The buyer
expands back toward the source of raw materials or forward in the direction of the ultimate
consumer. Google’s acquisition of Motorola Mobility in 2011 is an example. The acquisition
gave Google control over a major user of its Android operating system for smartphones.
A conglomerate merger involves companies in unrelated lines of businesses. For exam-
ple, the Indian Tata Group is a huge, widely diversified company. In recent years, its acquisi-
tions have been as diverse as Eight O’Clock Coffee, Corus Steel, Jaguar Land Rover, the Ritz
Carlton (Boston), and British Salt. No U.S. company is as diversified as Tata, but in the 1960s
and 1970s it was common in the United States for unrelated businesses to merge. Much of the
31-1 Sensible Motives for Mergers
● ● ● ● ●