USA Today - 27.03.2020

(Darren Dugan) #1
As the U.S. grapples with the grow-
ing coronavirus pandemic, the former
director of the Centers for Disease
Control and Prevention is lauding
America’s China travel ban, which was
enacted in late January.
Still, he says the U.S.
didn’t do enough to pre-
pare.
“The travel ban with
China made a differ-
ence,” Dr. Tom Frieden,
the former CDC director
and current head of
global health initiative Resolve to Save
Lives, told the USA TODAY editorial
board and reporters.
This month, Vice President Mike
Pence credited China travel restric-
tions as a big factor in helping avoid a
Europe-like spread of coronavirus in
the United States. The U.S. State De-
partment updated its advisory to “do
not travel to China” in late January.
Of the travel ban, Frieden said: “It
resulted in a significant delay in the
number of people coming in with in-
fection and because of that, that
bought time in the U.S. to better pre-
pare. And yet, that time wasn’t opti-
mally used.”
That time could’ve been used to
make the health care and public health
systems better prepared for initiatives
like contact tracing and personal pro-
tective equipment. The CDC generally
provides technical advice to agencies
such as the Department of Homeland
Security, which it did during the Ebola
crisis. But it’s up to that individual
agency to implement it.
Frieden criticized the focus of the
White House press briefings.
“When I hear a press conference
that spends close to half of its time dis-
cussing border control with Mexico
and Canada, which have lower case
rates than the U.S. ... and not focusing
on scaling up our ICU capacity or sys-
tematically organizing emergency
production of masks ... this is not a
way to run a railroad,” Frieden added.
Foreign nationals from China, Iran
and some European nations are barred
from entering the U.S. This includes
anyone who visited these countries
within 14 days prior to their U.S. trip.
Contributing: Dawn Gilbertson,
Nicquel Terry Ellis

Ex-CDC


director:


China


travel ban


helped US


David Oliver
USA TODAY

Frieden

4D ❚ FRIDAY, MARCH 27, 2020 ❚ USA TODAY NEWS


The text from United Airlines popped
up on Joe Bushee’s iPhone just before
dinner on Sunday.
“Your flight UA366 from Hartford to
Denver is canceled due to the unprece-
dented circumstances currently affect-
ing travel,” it said.
Bushee, 27, a television producer, had
already decided not to go on the trip
with his college buddies because of cor-
onavirus concerns but hadn’t called
United to cancel because the airline’s
website urged travelers to wait until 72
hours before their flight. Bushee’s
wasn’t due to leave until Thursday.
When he called United on Monday,
he asked about his reimbursement op-
tions. He wanted his $364 back and fig-
ured it was a no-brainer since United,
not him, canceled the flight. He had re-
ceived an instant refund for a concert in
Denver that was canceled.
Bushee said the agent told him Unit-
ed is not giving out refunds “at this
time” and offered a different flight to
Denver or a travel credit good through
December. Bushee declined.
He read up on the U.S. Department of
Transportation rules requiring refunds
on nonrefundable tickets when an air-
line cancels your flight and turned to
Twitter for help from United, to no avail.
He called United back, and a second
agent said he was due a refund, but
when he tried to process it, the comput-
er only showed a travel credit as an op-
tion. The agent told Bushee he hadn’t
seen any official policy from United
about not issuing refunds but figured it
was because the airline was losing “a lot
of revenue.”
Bushee asked to talk to a supervisor
and pressed his case. He was finally
promised a refund.
The most frustrating part of the or-
deal, he said: “Nobody seemed to know
why I couldn’t get the refund.”
No major U.S. airline is outwardly
touting the availability of cash refunds
to passengers whose flights are can-
celed given the industry’s precarious fi-
nances, typically offering rebooking or a
travel voucher as the first options online
and over the phone. (Travelers who can-
cel upcoming flights on their own can
rebook or receive a travel credit, with
the change fee usually waived depend-


ing on the travel date.)
But American, Delta and Southwest
do offer refunds for flights the airlines
cancel, their standard practice.
United is playing hardball with trav-
elers who should be eligible for a refund


  • something it did not do during the
    Boeing 737 Max crisis that grounded
    planes and forced thousands of flight
    cancellations over the past year.
    The airline’s coronavirus refund pol-
    icies for travelers whose flights are can-
    celed by the airline are the stingiest of
    the big four U.S. airlines and appear to
    skirt the DOT guidelines. An agency
    spokesperson said the government’s
    rules have not changed: a passenger is
    entitled to a refund if an airline cancels a
    flight and the passenger chooses not to
    accept an alternative flight on that air-
    line.
    United and other airlines have
    slashed flights in unprecedented num-
    bers as travel demand has plunged be-
    cause of government and business trav-
    el restrictions and traveler anxiety.
    Domestic flights: For canceled
    flights within the United States, United
    is not issuing refunds unless the new
    flight their computer system automati-
    cally put you on delays your departure
    or arrival by more than six hours. If it
    doesn’t, and you don’t want to travel,
    you’ll receive a travel credit for the value
    of the ticket. (United booked Bushee on
    a flight three hours later, which required
    a connection. His original flight was
    nonstop.) The DOT policy does not
    mention time frames for determining a


refund when a flight is canceled. There
is a separate policy on refunds for sig-
nificant delays caused by a schedule
change.
The only exception to United’s do-
mestic refund policy: flight cancella-
tions to destinations the airline no
longer serves due to coronavirus fall-
out. Those travelers can get their mon-
ey back. So far, that list only includes
Mammoth Lakes, California, United
spokeswoman Leslie Scott said.
International flights: United is ef-
fectively delaying any passenger re-
funds for up to a year. Travelers whose
flights are canceled – international
flights service has nearly been elimi-
nated – will receive a voucher for the
value of their ticket, and if they don’t
use it within a year of the purchase
date, they can then get a refund.
“It seems like they are going out of
their way to not be as accommodating
as other airlines are, and that’s unac-
ceptable,” said William J. McGee, avia-
tion adviser for Consumer Reports.
The DOT said in a statement to USA
TODAY the department was aware of
complaints regarding airlines’ refund
practices and was reviewing the issue.
Scott said United has communicat-
ed with DOT about its policies “and
they have not objected.” She also said
other major global airlines, including
Air France/KLM and Lufthansa, have
implemented a similar policy of only
offering credits for international
flights, some without the option for a
refund later.

TRAVEL


United Airlines’ policy

on refunds drawing ire

Coronavirus response


differs from last crisis


Dawn Gilbertson
USA TODAY


United is playing hardball with travelers who should be eligible for a refund –
something it did not do during the recent Boeing 737 Max crisis. JEFF CHIU/AP FILE

To avoid that grim fate, Cuomo has
urged the federal government to take
control of protective equipment pro-
duction and get more supplies to New
York as soon as possible. He noted that
the shortages threaten countless other
communities across the country just
starting to get hit by the virus. Cuomo
also praised health care workers and
first responders for their bravery.
“Most of us are in our home hun-
kered down, worried. They’re worried
and they’re going out there every day
despite their fear. ... Overcoming their
fear, and not for their family, they’re
doing it for your family,” he said.


What nurses say about
equipment shortages


Some nurses described a disconnect
between Cuomo’s comments at daily
news briefings and what some hospi-
tals are demanding of workers.
“They’re being asked to do things
that jeopardize their health and make it
hard to take care of their patients,” said
Boyts, who gathers Westchester Med-
ical Center nurse grievances for the
New York State Nurses Association
union.
“You wouldn’t ask police to go into a
gun battle without a gun, but we’re be-
ing asked to put our lives on the line
each day without the equipment that
we need to do it.”
Lori Glazer, a registered nurse from
Ossining, also is worried by the lack of
gear.
“We don’t have N95 masks, we just
have (surgical masks). They’re protect-
ing other people, not us,” Glazer said.
“It’s scary going in because you never


know when you’re going to get sick.”
At Montefiore Health’s hospital in
the Bronx, nurses with suspected CO-
VID-19 exposures are being told to
break the typical 14-day quarantine
and return to work early, according to
Karine Raymond, a Montefiore nurse
and union leader.
The order apparently came as the
CDC recommended loosening quaran-
tine rules for medical workers, joining
the already diminished infection con-
trol practices that nurses say put them
at risk. The federal agency in late Feb-
ruary recommended extended use and
reuse of masks connected to COVID-19
related shortages, deviating from long-
held infection control standards. The
quarantine strategy for medical work-
ers was last updated on March 16, rec-
ords show.
It is all part of what state and federal
health officials say is a dire attempt to
keep hospitals afloat in the face of po-
tentially overwhelming COVID-19 in-
fections. Yet amid debate over the
emergency actions, nurses at Monte-
fiore were being warned they could be
fired if they didn’t adhere to the hospi-
tal’s new protective gear rules, accord-
ing to Montefiore records reviewed by
the USA TODAY Network – New York.
Eventually, Montefiore sent out a
message Friday canceling the original
order threatening termination and said
it was “sent in error,” the records show.
Michele Brailsford-Paul, a home
care nurse for Montefiore, said she re-
cently filed a complaint with federal
worker safety regulators in Tarrytown
about the shortages in protective
equipment.

What hospitals say about
nurses’ equipment complaints

Montefiore officials asserted the
Bronx-based health system with 15

hospitals is following CDC guidelines
on COVID-19 and prepares for all types
of emergencies.
“Comprehensive plans have been in
place to reduce risk of potential expo-
sure to our patients, staff and commu-
nity,” the officials said in a statement.
Westchester Medical Center Health
Network officials disputed that nurses
have limited access to N95 masks and
asserted the health system with 10 hos-
pitals across the region is following
CDC guidelines.
“Like every other hospital and
healthcare organization, we are man-
aging our supply pipeline and use very
carefully,” the officials said in a state-
ment. They added the health system’s
workforce is “coming to work every day
to help and serve their friends and
neighbors. They truly are healthcare
heroes.”
Montefiore likewise disputes the al-
legations that nurses are short of pro-
tective gear.
“Protecting our staff is also of ut-
most importance so we can continue to
provide care as this pandemic con-
tinues to worsen. We are working tire-
lessly with state and federal govern-
ments to secure appropriate protective
gear for our providers and equipment
for our patients,” the Montefiore offi-
cials said in a statement.
Meanwhile, some nurses criticized
the CDC guidelines for giving hospitals
the green light to limit access to protec-
tive gear, regardless of the safety ram-
ifications.

“What they’re telling us to do is not
based on the science of the virus; it’s
based on what is available for any given
day,” Boyts said.
CDC officials didn’t immediately re-
spond to a request to comment on the
nurses’ complaints in New York.
The state Department of Health
would not say if it is investigating com-
plaints from nurses about the condi-
tions at hospitals. It noted the CDC
continues to issue revised guidance re-
garding the use of protective gear.
“The (Health) Department takes the
safety of New Yorkers very seriously
and is also working to provide addi-
tional guidance to hospitals,” agency
spokeswoman Jill Montag said in a
statement.
Hospital officials, in many ways,
have been tasked with finding the bal-
ance between implementing the new
CDC guidelines for stretching protec-
tive equipment supplies and worker
safety.
One is Dr. Erick Eiting, vice chair of
operations for emergency medicine at
Mount Sinai Downtown, which in-
cludes an emergency department and
urgent care in New York City that han-
dles about 97,000 patients a year.
Eiting compared the effort to imple-
ment new mask-use guidelines to the
rapidly evolving outbreak response in
New York.
It is all seemingly part of a daily
stream of drastic actions, such as con-
verting the Javits Center in Manhattan
into a temporary hospital, aimed at
helping prepare the health system to
handle surging infections.
“A lot of it is there is so much anxiety
about this because we’re dealing with a
totally new phenomenon and trying to
take the best practices we’ve built with
other diseases and apply them here,
but we’re also learning on the fly,” he
said.

Nurses


Continued from Page 1D


“You wouldn’t ask police to


go into a gun battle without


a gun.”
Lori Glazer, a registered nurse
Free download pdf