The Economist 14Dec2019

(lily) #1
The EconomistDecember 14th 2019 Books & arts 73

1

N


ot evenclassical music, politest of art
forms, is safe from politics. In the
mid-20th century, when performers affili-
ated with the Third Reich visited American
concert halls, patriotic audiences howled.
The Norwegian soprano Kirsten Flagstad—
whose husband was a lumber magnate and
Nazi collaborator—had to sing in Philadel-
phia in 1947 amid stink bombs and protest
signs. When Herbert von Karajan, an Aus-
trian maestro and former member of the
Nazi party, brought the Berlin Philharmon-
ic to New York in 1955, demonstrators re-
leased pigeons bearing anti-fascist mes-
sages from the balcony of Carnegie Hall.
During the first world war, the concert-
going public in America had targeted for-
eign composers as well as musicians. Audi-
ences evinced a particular distaste for any
works featuring the German language, and
disdained pieces by living or nationalistic
Germans. Hence Wagner and Richard
Strauss were struck from playbills, while
the humanistic Beethoven generally got a
pass. Prominent German conductors of
American symphony orchestras were dis-
missed from their posts and locked up.
Jonathan Rosenberg chronicles these
instances of musical nationalism in “Dan-
gerous Melodies”, his survey of classical
music’s intersection with politics in the
20th century. The competing strain of
thought, he writes, is musical universal-
ism: the squishy notion that music “could
act as a balm, a unifier, a force for uplift,
and even as a catalyst for global co-opera-
tion”. Mr Rosenberg is as sceptical of the
universalists as he is of the nationalists,
but he ably covers both in his informative
(if occasionally repetitive) book.
The two great musical universalists of
the century were Arturo Toscanini, a leg-
endary Italian maestro, and Leonard Bern-
stein, an American composer who con-
ducted, too. Toscanini declined to perform
at Bayreuth while Nazi banners flew, in-
stead lending his prestige to the fledgling
Palestine Symphony Orchestra. He refused
to lead the fascist hymn “Giovinezza” at the
beginning of a performance of “Falstaff”,
breaking his baton and declaring, “La Scala
artists aren’t vaudeville singers.” In 1943, as
he walked to the podium to lead a radio
broadcast celebrating the collapse of the
fascist Italian government, tears of joy
streamed down his face. “Nothing should

interfere with music,” he later declared.
Bernstein went further. Rather than
simply resisting the efforts of nationalists
to co-opt music, during the cold war he ac-
tively sought to use the art form to bring ad-
versaries together. Touring Europe and the
Soviet Union with the New York Philhar-
monic in 1959, he stressed the ability of
symphonies to break down barriers and
calm hostilities. Music is “uncluttered
with conceptual notions, no words are in-
volved”, he said. “You can’t argue with a g-
sharp.” With lectures and concerts—not to
mention podium histrionics full of pas-
sion and anguish—Bernstein charmed au-
diences on both sides of the Iron Curtain.
Yet despite these idealistic gestures, Mr

Rosenberg notes, all sides in the cold war
persisted in trying to weaponise their mu-
sical stars, with mixed success. The Soviet
composer Dmitri Shostakovich, twice de-
nounced by Stalin, said whatever his hand-
lers told him to say in public but would
rather have been left alone to work. Van Cli-
burn, a lanky American pianist, played the
great concertos of Rachmaninoff and
Tchaikovsky in a lush romantic style, prov-
ing that America could compete with Rus-
sia culturally as well as militarily. But he
was a clumsy statesman. When Dwight Ei-
senhower hosted him at the White House,
he brought a Soviet friend uninvited. The
president, no music-lover, paid Cliburn
back by skipping his evening concert. 7

Music and politics

Stars and bars


Dangerous Melodies.By Jonathan
Rosenberg. W.W. Norton; 512 pages; $39.95
and £28

L


aura o’dayis not a professional singer.
Nonetheless, last year she auditioned
for On Site Opera’s seasonal production of
“Amahl and the Night Visitors”, a Christmas
staple by Gian Carlo Menotti, because she
heard that chorus members would be paid
and she needed the money. She used to bag
groceries but now, at 58, is on medical leave
because of severe arthritis, chronic pancre-
atitis, lymphoma, diabetes and various

other maladies—“It’s easier to say what I
don’t have,” she says with a grim laugh—
which are a legacy of her years living rough
and addicted to drugs.
She heard about the auditions because
she lives in The Times Square, a Manhattan
building run by Breaking Ground, the city’s
largest provider of permanent supportive
housing for the homeless—and a collabo-
rator on the production. Ms O’Day thought
she would quit after a rehearsal or two, but
found the experience so rewarding that she
decided to join the acclaimed troupe for a
second year, performing in a sold-out re-
vival at the Holy Apostles Soup Kitchen
that ended on December 8th.
On Site Opera has been taking opera out
of traditional venues since 2012. The aim,
says Eric Einhorn, the company’s co-foun-
der and artistic director, is to demystify an
art form that struggles to attract younger
audiences. By staging shows in unusual
spaces, such as “The Barber of Seville” in an
Upper East Side mansion and “Pygmalion”
in Madame Tussauds, the company found
it could both keep costs down (by avoiding
rent and doing without built scenery) and
create the kind of intimate theatrical expe-
riences that patrons like. As his team went
from staging one production a year to
three, Mr Einhorn became more ambitious
in other ways, too. Eager to produce an op-
era with a social impact, he contacted
Breaking Ground. The result is a uniquely
moving production of “Amahl”.
The title character of Menotti’s opera,
which had its premiere in a television
broadcast on Christmas Eve 1951, is a poor,
crippled shepherd boy who, with his wid-

NEW YORK
An opera company recruits singers from among the city’s homeless

Art and society

No crib for a bed


Suffer the little children
Free download pdf