A4 MONDAY, APRIL 6, 2020 LATIMES.COM
Home Delivery and
Membership Program
For questions about delivery,
billing and vacation holds, or
for information about our
Membership program, please
contact us at (213) 283-2274 or
membershipservices@
latimes.com. You can also
manage your account at
myaccount.latimes.com.
Letters to the Editor
Want to write a letter to be
published in the paper and
online? E-mail
[email protected].
For submission guidelines,
see latimes.com/letters.
Readers’ Representative
If you believe we have
made an error, or you have
questions about our
journalistic standards
and practices, our readers’
representative can be
reached at
readers.representative
@latimes.com, (877) 554-
or online at
latimes.com/readersrep.
Advertising
For print and online
advertising information, go to
latimes.com/mediakitor call
(213) 237-6176.
Reprint Requests
For the rights to use articles,
photos, graphics and page
reproductions, e-mail
[email protected] call
(213) 237-4565.
Times In Education
To get the digital
Los Angeles Times at no
cost (along with our
newspaper–based teaching
materials), contact us at
latimes.com/tie, or email
[email protected]
The Newsroom
Know something important
we should cover? Send a
secure tip at
latimes.com/tips. To send a
press release go to the
newsroom directory at
latimes.com/staff.
Media Relations
For outside media requests
and inquiries, e-mail
[email protected].
L.A. Times Store
Search archives, merchandise
and front pages at
latimes.com/store.
How to contact us
(800) LA TIMES
Founded Dec. 4, 1881
Vol. CXXXIX No. 125
LOS ANGELES TIMES (ISSN 0458-3035)
is published by the Los Angeles Times,
2300 E. Imperial Highway, El Segundo, CA
- Periodicals postage is paid at Los
Angeles, CA, and additional cities.
POSTMASTER: Send address changes to
the above address.
Home Delivery Subscription Rates (all rates
include applicable CA sales taxes and apply
to most areas)
Print + unlimited digital rates:
Seven-day $17/week, $884 annually.
Thursday–Sunday $16/week, $832 annually.
Thursday & Sunday $6.99/week, $363.
annually. Saturday & Sunday $6.99/week,
$363.48 annually. Sunday $6.99/week,
$363.48 annually. Monday–Saturday
$16/week, $832 annually (also includes
Sundays, except 2/17, 4/21, 9/1, and 10/27).
Monday–Friday $16/week, $832 annually.
Print-only rates:
Seven-day $1,144 annually.
Thursday–Sunday $884 annually. Thursday
& Sunday $364 annually. Saturday &
Sunday $364 annually. Sunday $
annually. Monday–Saturday $936 annually
(also includes Sundays, except 2/17, 4/21,
9/1, and 10/27). Monday–Friday $
annually.
Pricing for all subscriptions includes the
Thanksgiving 11/28 issue.
All subscriptions may include up to seven
Premium Edition issues per year. For each
Premium issue, your account balance will be
charged an additional fee up to $4.49 in the
billing period when the section publishes.
This will result in shortening the length of
your billing period. Future premium issues
scheduled to date: Envelope 2/9/20,
Baseball Preview 3/22/20, NFL Preview
8/30/20, Holiday Gift Guide 11/1/20, 101
Restaurants 12/13/20, Year in Review
12/27/20. Dates are subject to change
without notice.
Printed with soy-based ink on recycled newsprint from wood byproducts.
Ma Yansong:In the April 5
Calendar section, an article
about Lucas Museum of
Narrative Art lead architect
Ma Yansong attributed pub-
lished criticisms about the
museum to Chicago Tribune
architecture critic Blair
Kamin. The comments
should have been attributed
to Tribune culture writer
Steve Johnson.
FOR THE
RECORD
ment public appearances.
“She is the star of the
moment,” said Donald J.
Savoie, an expert on public
administration at the Uni-
versity of Moncton in New
Brunswick.
She is also the most
prominent and consequen-
tial woman in Canada.
Described by Maclean’s
magazine as “the minister of
everything,” Freeland has
the two toughest portfolios
in Canadian politics and
may be in line to be the
country’s next leader even if
Trudeau, who is in self-
imposed isolation after his
wife contracted the virus,
stays healthy.
The tendrils of power
linking Trudeau and Free-
land are increasingly promi-
nent. Since the autumn she
has been operating out of
the same building across
from Parliament Hill as
Trudeau. Once Trudeau
completed his remarks
virtually closing the
borders,he turned to Free-
land to roll out a series of
dramatic policy changes.
She approached all this
with what might be called
Chrystia cool and with an
inclination for understate-
ment.
“I wouldn’t call it fran-
tic,” she said in an interview
recently as the House of
Commons paused from
debating an emergency
financial package to ad-
dress the crisis. “It is very
busy.”
Very busy indeed. As she
took over a new coronavirus
Cabinet committee, she
called for a “whole of coun-
try” approach to the threat,
seeking to mobilize busi-
ness, labor and civic organi-
zations. She won the swift
support of business leaders,
who sometimes say the
Liberals do not engage
enough with the commer-
cial sector.
If it can be said that
Freeland, 51, has arrived, it
is in part because of her
arrival back in Canada after
a Rhodes scholarship and
years as a foreign corre-
spondent and editor in Kyiv,
London, New York and
elsewhere.
The author of influential
books about Russia and
global wealth disparities,
she entered politics during
the Conservative Party
reign of Prime Minister
Stephen Harper, winning a
House of Commons seat in
Toronto in 2013 and moving
swiftly to prominence, be-
coming Trudeau’s minister
of international trade two
years later and, 14 months
after that, taking over as
foreign minister.
“Even people who had
not read her books,” said
Rohinton P. Medhora, presi-
dent of the nonpartisan
Center for International
Governance Innovation,
“could look to her and say:
‘If we get a government with
her in it, there will be a
change from the Harper
years.’ ”
b
Chrystia Freeland was
born in the remote settle-
ment of Peace River in
northwestern Alberta to
parents who were lawyers in
a community that then had
a population of just under
5,400 and was five hours by
car from Edmonton. Some
relatives were Ukrainians
who had spent time in a
displaced-persons camp in
war-ravaged Europe, some
had homesteaded in the
Canadian outback and
pursued classic Canadian
diversions that included
riding in the Calgary Stam-
pede.
Years later, she would
sing to her three children in
Ukrainian; she’s married to
New York Times cultural
arts writer Graham Bowley,
who commutes to their
Toronto home even as she
commutes to her Ottawa
battle station.
It’s a frantic life but,
according to Daphne Taras,
dean of the Ted Rogers
School of Management at
Toronto’s Ryerson Uni-
versity, “she’s a combination
of very intense and very laid
back.”
“It seems contradictory,”
Taras continued, “but there
she is, biking around town
but looking crisp and great.”
But it was her Western
ties rather than her metro
persona that led Trudeau to
task her with addressing
discontent in two provinces
that have long felt ignored
by the federal government.
“The appointment re-
flected the main concerns of
the government,” said Eric
Marquis, Quebec’s assistant
deputy minister for bilateral
relations. “She’s one of the
firefighters in Ottawa,
putting out the flames.
She’s the only one in the
government who has the
credibility to do that.”
For a native Albertan to
address Western alienation
is a challenge, said Michael
Hawes, executive director of
Fulbright Canada, “but she
is a successful and purpose-
ful politician, she has en-
tered into negotiations that
were difficult, she doesn’t
suffer fools easily and she
clearly has the ear of the
prime minister.”
Having the ear of
Trudeau is especially im-
portant now that so many
voices are demanding atten-
tion. But Freeland’s promi-
nence is a result of the tone
and timbre of her voice —
forceful but not frantic,
intelligent but not incendi-
ary. And it comes from
loyalty.
Hers was an important
female voice of support
during the complex domes-
tic SNF-Lavalin imbroglio,
when Freeland sided with
the embattled Trudeau
after charges of improper
prime-ministerial meddling
in a justice issue that came
from accusations by anoth-
er prominent Cabinet mem-
ber, Atty. Gen. Jody Wilson-
Raybould. In a classic act of
finesse, Freeland noted
Trudeau’s “feminist” record
but acknowledged that
Wilson-Raybould spoke
“her truth.”
Indeed, diplomatic skills
marked her period as Cana-
da’s chief trade official and,
then, its chief face in global
affairs and at global con-
claves. They also helped
nudge the U.S. and Canada
together in the move from
NAFTA to USMCA, the new
trade accord.
“Being told we had to
renegotiate NAFTA was an
existential crisis for us,” said
Jennifer Welsh, who holds a
chair in global governance
and security at McGill Uni-
versity. “It required her to
access a long list of constitu-
encies — senators, House
members, mayors — and
she managed that well.”
It also displayed Free-
land’s nationalist side.
When she left Reuters in
2013, she told Time maga-
zine that she “felt myself to
be very Canadian.” That
was a slightly surprising
remark from someone who
had cultivated an image as a
citizen of the world.
But as the coronavirus
surged through North
America, Freeland’s sense
of being Canadian surged as
well.
“As a politician, and
particularly a political
leader in difficult periods —
NAFTA, now coronavirus —
I have come to feel a pro-
found connection with the
Canadians I serve, and a
very deep responsibility to
Canadians,” she said. “As a
journalist, you feel a respon-
sibility to your readers, but
now there is a responsibility
for me to be 1,000% emotion-
ally invested.”
That nationalism be-
came apparent in her will-
ingness to take on the U.S.
and its president, who im-
posed tariffs on Canadian
steel and aluminum. After
the Trump administration
said the tariffs were
prompted by “national
security” concerns, she
responded by addressing
the American people:
“I think what is impor-
tant for Americans to
understand is the justifica-
tion under your rules for the
imposition of these tariffs
was a national-security
consideration. So, what
you’re saying to us and to all
your NATO allies is that we
somehow represent a na-
tional security threat to the
United States.”
Then she added, mor-
dantly: “And I would just say
to all of Canada’s American
friends ... Seriously?”
In the end, she won some
of the market access that
Canada wanted, though the
agreement might have come
at the expense of innovation
sectors, particularly intel-
lectual property and data
management.
Overall, her record has
not been unblemished.
Critics said she paid too
little attention to China and
India. And as Canada re-
news its perhaps-doomed
efforts to win one of the
rotating seats on the United
Nations Security Council,
some critics believe she did
not engage in enough
schmoozing with African
leaders — a critical U.N.
voting group.
She’s also won the en-
mity of Russian President
Vladimir Putin and top
Chinese officials. After she
criticized government sup-
pression of protests in Hong
Kong — where 300,000 Ca-
nadian citizens reside —
China cited her for making
“irresponsible remarks on
Hong Kong affairs repeat-
edly, and grossly [interfer-
ing] in China’s internal
affairs.”
“In an era when many
politicians in democracies
are accommodating auto-
crats and dictators, she is
someone who stands up to
them, sometimes to the
detriment of her country,”
said Michael J. Abramowitz,
president of the Washing-
ton-based Freedom House,
a democracy watchdog
group.
“She’s done it for Ro-
hingya Muslims in Myan-
mar, on Hong Kong with
China, and the rights of
women activists who have
been jailed in Saudi Arabia.
Freedom and democracy
are the core issues for her.”
Freeland drew inspira-
tion from Prime Minister
Louis St. Laurent (in office
1948 to 1957), who believed
Canadian foreign policy
should be governed by what
he called “the rule of law in
national and international
affairs.”
She won credit globally
for speaking out in favor
of the liberal international
order — perhaps the only
prominent North American
official to do so — and she
was not shy about the
importance of using mili-
tary force.
“Of course it must be a
last resort,” she told the
broadcaster CBC last year.
“But I really believe in this
moment today — when ...
there are many threats to
the liberal international
order — it is precisely the
democracies, it is precisely
the countries that stand for
values and human rights
that also need to be ready to
say we are prepared to use
hard power when neces-
sary.”
b
When Freeland, who had
worked at the Financial
Times, Reuters and the
Globe and Mail, left journal-
ism for politics, she took
with her some of the tools of
news gathering — the ability
to assess situations swiftly,
the instinct to distrust
convention, the reliance on
a searching examination
before making a conclusion.
“I have always been a
big believer in primary
sources,” she said. “But at
the same time, for decades I
always tried to reach out to
talk to independent experts
with specific knowledge. I
have been talking to doctors
and to professors and also
to business leaders and to
union leaders.”
She also brought to her
new role familiarity with the
global movers and shakers,
many of whom she profiled
or knew from her days
walking the corridors of
power in Europe and North
America.
But for her, journalism
provided both entree and
limits. She prospered from
the former and bumped up
against the latter, and not a
few in journalism believe she
migrated into politics be-
cause she topped out of
journalism at the relatively
young age of 45.
And yet she was marked
deeply by journalism. In a
public discussion with U.N.
High Commissioner for
Human Rights Michelle
Bachelet last year, she at-
tacked the notion that
journalists were, as Presi-
dent Trump has frequently
said, the “enemy of the
people.” But she admitted,
“That doesn’t mean I re-
spond with joy in my heart
to every single question I’m
asked.”
Two years ago, during a
meeting with Trudeau, she
turned to him and said,
“Prime minister, that is a
scoop. No one knows that.”
Trudeau looked bewildered,
finally reminding Freeland
that her journalism days
were over. “Some of the
instincts do die hard,” she
told the CBC.
Like this one:
“Journalists are accus-
tomed to working on dead-
line with incomplete infor-
mation, and I think you
cannot be a successful
breaking-news journalist —
covering collapse of the
Soviet Union, for example —
without understanding that
sometimes you must choose
speed over perfection,” she
said. “That is the motto of
every news desk in the
world, and it is certainly
something I have been
saying to the members of
our coronavirus Cabinet
committee — that we need
to act with agility and
alacrity.”
Jeremy Kinsman, then
Canada’s ambassador to
Russia, met Freeland in
Moscow when she was a
young journalist. Later he
reconnected with her in
Kyiv while her mother was
helping Ukrainians draft
their initial constitution.
But it was clear to Kins-
man, if not to others, that
she eventually wanted to
return to Canada, which is
not always congenial to the
return of the prodigal.
She, however, avoided
the chilly homecoming
journalist author Michael
Ignatieff received when
he returned from Harvard.
He eventually became the
Liberal leader and presided
over the party’s 2011 federal
election debacle, losing
his own seat in the process.
“It didn’t happen with
her,” Kinsman said. “The
reason is personality and
cleverness and the fact that
she is a terrific communica-
tor. She has come home and
been very successful be-
cause people have seen
her operations abroad as
a star.
“She’s not bringing Can-
ada some kind of glory she
won abroad. She was the
only one with the chops and
chutzpah to deal with di-
plomacy in the age of
Trump.”
Shribman is a special
correspondent.
She leads Canada’s coronavirus battle
DEPUTY PRIME MINISTER Chrystia Freeland is “the star of the moment,” one observer said. She is at
the front lines of Canada’s pandemic response — and in the front row in government public appearances.
Brett GundlockGetty Images
[Canada,from A1]
FREELAND helped nudge the U.S. and Canada together in last year’s move
to an updated North American trade agreement, which includes Mexico.
Marco UgarteAssociated Press