Sight&Sound - 05.2020

(Jacob Rumans) #1

REVIEWS


80 | Sight&Sound | May 2020

office, or the aggressively institutional
green of the hospital. Color unifies and
abstracts in surprising moments: when Leo is
put into a cop car after a night of wandering the
streets, his lips, parted slightly, are illuminated
by the cruiser’s blood-red light. The scenes in
Mexico echo the austere framing of the desert
in Potter’s The Gold Diggers (1983), while the
scenes in Greece are ambiguous to the point
of abstraction. Like all great films about a

person who’s stuck in their own head, there
is an expansiveness to The Roads Not Taken –
which Leo cannot experience nor share.
In the final moments of the film, following
a difficult heart-to-heart, there are two
versions of Molly – one who is leaving to go
to work, and another who is staying with
him. It’s a rather bittersweet suggestion
that Leo will belatedly reimagine how he
spent the day before with his daughter.

Brooklyn, New York. Leo, who has a neurological
disorder, lies in bed, not responding to his bell or
mobile. His daughter Molly enters his apartment and
takes him to the dentist and to the optometrist. As
time passes, Leo recalls his life in Mexico with his first
wife, Dolores, and imagines that he goes to mourn
their son on the Day of the Dead. He also recalls
visiting a Greek island, where he writes his novel and
follows beautiful, much younger women. He rows out
to meet the giant yacht they’re aboard, but keeps

falling behind; eventually, he lies comatose in the
boat, and is discovered by sailors. It is unclear if this
is how his neurological disorder was first manifested,
or if it’s imaginary. Molly loses a job because she
has spent the day trying to care for her father. Leo
leaves his apartment and wanders through New
York. He is helped by two cabbies. Returning home,
he attempts to have a heart-to-heart talk with Molly.
They come to an understanding. Two versions of
Molly appear: one leaves, the other stays with him.

Produced by
Christopher Sheppard
Written by
Sally Potter
Director of
Photography
Robbie Ryan
Editors
Emilie Orsini
Sally Potter
Jason Rayton
Production Designer
Carlos Conti
Music by/Keyboards
Sally Potter
Production
Sound Mixer

Yves-Marie Omnes
Costume Designer
Catherine George
©British Broadcasting
Corporation and the
British Film Institute
and AP (Molly) Ltd
Production
Companies
Bleecker Street
and HanWay Films,
BFI and BBC Films
present in association
with Ingenious Media,
Head Gear Films and
Metrol Technology

an Adventure
Pictures production
in association with
Washington Square
Films and La Terraza
Films in co-production
with Chimney
and Film i Väst
A film by Sally Potter
Developed by
BBC Films
Developed with the
support of Pont
Neuf Productions
Made with the
support of the
BFI’s Film Fund

Executive Producers
Lizzie Francke
Rose Garnett
Joe Oppenheimer
Marie-Gabrielle
Stewart
Peter Watson
Andrew Karpen
Kent Sanderson
Peter Touche
Stephen Dailey
Phil Hunt
Compton Ross
Joshua Blum
Amy Hass
Edmon Roch
Cristóbal García

Frida Torresblanco
John Giwa-Amu

Cast
Javier Bardem
Leo
Elle Fanning
Molly
Branka Katic
Xenia
Milena Tscharntke
Anni
Laura Linney
Rita
Salma Hayek
Dolores

Dimitri Andreas
Mikael
Katia Mullova-Brind
Mel
In Colour
Distributor
Universal Pictures
International
UK & Eire

The me inside: Javier Bardem, Laura Linney

Credits and Synopsis

Reviewed by Ela Bittencourt
When it comes to horror, there is nothing
more frightening than the human mind.
This motto is brilliantly encapsulated in
the British writer-director Rose Glass’s debut
feature Saint Maud. As with other great religious
horror films – including Scott Derrickson’s
The Exorcism of Emily Rose (2005) and Cristian
Mungiu’s Beyond the Hills (2012) in the recent
crop, and to some extent Brian De Palma’s
1976 classic Carrie – the conjuration of wild
daylight visions and spiritual torments in
Saint Maud skilfully blurs the line between
a possible medical condition and outright
madness, while also slyly suggesting that
the film’s heroine may in fact be possessed.
In this respect, Glass borrows a page from
psychoanalysis by portraying zealous
spirituality as psychosomatic, but gives neither
the religious dogma nor medicine a final say.
In the film’s opening, a young woman,
Maud (Morfydd Clark), has suffered an
accident involving a patient while working
as a hospital nurse. The mysterious incident
is a mere flashback, but its gory tableau,
shrouded in sickly green colours, sets up Maud
as a tormented soul with a shadowy past. The
action then follows the tight-lipped, socially
awkward Maud to her next job, providing
palliative home care for a once-famous, now
disabled ex-dancer, Amanda (Jennifer Ehle).
Maud’s dedication to Amanda is absolute, but
she’s repulsed by Amanda’s lifestyle, which
includes recreational drinking and drugs.
Glass lavishes particular attention on
the way Maud and Amanda’s relationship
escalates, veering from adoration to scorn.
Her script shows both women as multifaceted:
Amanda, played with cool reserve and airy
sophistication by Ehle, is smitten with Maud’s
innocence and religious resolve, but also
finds her offensively small-minded. Maud,
brilliantly acted by Clark, is by contrast all
vulnerability and pent-up tension: fawning
in one scene, quick to lash out in another.
Glass stirs sexual jealousy into the mix, when
Amanda is visited by a female escort, and
Maud eavesdrops on the two, further blurring
the line between God’s purported whisperings
and tyrannical self-interest.
This rollercoaster of tormented emotions,
which feed into and off dogma, is aided by Ben
Fordesman’s astute cinematography, which
makes the most of tight framing. The camera
stays so close to the protagonists, particularly
Maud, that it allows us little space to see her
objectively. In the collapse of perspectival
distance lies the film’s rich ambiguity; the close-
ups obliterate the world and lock us into Maud’s
point of view, reinforcing the immensity of her
feelings and the extent to which these feelings
overwrite and distort her sense of space and
time, her notion of right and wrong.
As the images mutate from drab and prosaic
to more vividly disturbing, Glass slowly
chips away at our certainty about how to
interpret the story. By the time she rolls out the
spectacular finale, we have plunged so deep
into ecstasy that we’re ready to empathise with
Maud, perhaps even to dread her wrath.

Saint Maud
United Kingdom 2019
Director: Rose Glass
Certificate 15 84m 27s
Free download pdf