Name Date Court reference
LUBITZ v. GARRETT 1992 962 F.2d 7;
1992 U.S. App.
LEXIS 17272
(4th Cir. 1992)
STARUCH v. U.S. BUREAU OF INFORMATION. 1992 EEOC Opinion
VARTIVARIAN v. GOLDEN RULE INSURANCE
COMPANY
1992 1992 U.S. App.
LEXIS 12458
(7th Cir. June
3, 1992)ANG v. PROCTER & GAMBLE CO., 1991 932 F.2d 540,
546 (6th Cir.
1991)
DABOR v. DAYTON POWER & LIGHT COMPANY 1991 888 F. 2d 127
(6th Cir. 1991)
XIENG v. PEOPLES NATIONAL BANK OF
WASHINGTON
1991 120 Wn.2d 512,
844 P.2d 389,
1993 Wash.
LEXIS 24, 65
Fair Empl.
Prac. Cas.
(BNA) 1090
(1993)CARROLL v. ELLIOTT PERSONNEL SERVICES 1989 51 FEP 1173,
1175, 1989 WL
167678
(D.Md.1989)
FRAGANTE v. HONOLULU 1989 888 F.2d 591
(9th Cir. 1989)
KAHAKUA v. FRIDAY 1989 876 F.2d 896
(9th Cir. 1989)
RODRIGUEZ v. CITY OF HIALEAH 1989 716 F. Supp.
1425 (S.D. Fla.
1989)
STEPHEN v. PGA SHERATON RESORT, LTD. 1989 873 F.2d 276,
279 (11th Cir.
1989)
GUTIERREZ v. MUNICIPAL COURT OF THE
SOUTHEAST JUDICIAL
1988 838 F.2d 1031
(9th Cir. 1988)