Figure 18.2 Population change over time by race/ethnicity 1960 > 2005 > 2050 (projected)
Source: U.S. Census
The question is, can this unbroken circle of intimidation truly not be
broken, or do we like things the way they are? Language serves as a
convenient excuse to turn away. Are we unwilling to consider a nation in
which the cost of success is achievement measured by other, fairer,
means?
Ideology is most effective when its workings are least visible, and
standard language ideology in the U.S. functions like a silent but efficient
machine. Its practitioners are terribly skillful at coercing consent and
participation from those people and groups who suffer the most under the
weight of language ideology. Thus the most factual stand: every language
is in fact completely viable and functional, therefore we do not need and
should not attempt standardization – seems to be doomed.
And if that is the case, if human nature will allow nothing else, then it is
only common sense to remember that power will shift, and one day – most
likely within the lifetimes of those reading this book – the power of the
majority will shift too. Putting inclusive, respectful, cooperative language
policies in place now is the first step toward making sure they are still in
place when you, personally, need them.