C6| Saturday/Sunday, March 28 - 29, 2020 **** THE WALL STREET JOURNAL.
Tele-
health
systems
are
growing
rapidly in
response
to the
crisis.
Disasters remind us that
we depend on each other.
Dangerous times remind governments that their
first loyalty is to their own citizens.
Nations Push Back
Against a
Globalized World
Habitsof
Kindness
ThatWill
Endure
AROUND 8 P.M.onJan.20,Ire-
ceived the call: A test had con-
firmed that one of the hospitals
where I oversee clinical care, in
Everett, Wash., had admitted the
first Covid-19 patient in the U.S.
The coronavirus bomb went off
in our corner of the country that
day, and we quickly realized that
the pandemic would change
health care faster than anything
before. We are now leveraging
telehealth technology in ways
that will last long after this pan-
demic.
The Providence health sys-
tem, where I work, now has
more than 1,200 beds occupied
by patients who have the virus
or are suspected of having it
across the seven states in the
western U.S. where we operate.
We’re now testing more than
11,000 people a day and are run-
ning four clinical trials.
Within several weeks we were
sharing lessons we had learned,
from the importance of planning
and data to treating all patients
BYAMYCOMPTON-PHILLIPS
needed. A nurse at a command
center in Montana can monitor
ICU patients in a Washington
hospital and alert a physician to
a change in a patient’s status,
just as if they were located in
the same building.
For staffing shortages, our
“telehospitalist” program lets
hospitals bring in more physi-
cians in a hurry. We have more
than 10,000 doctors enrolled to
help manage patients remotely,
which can provide expert care
in an area experiencing a surge
of patients without needing to
physically move the physicians.
So far, most pa-
tients don’t need to
be hospitalized, and
treating people at
home lets us reserve
our limited acute
care resources for
those with severe
symptoms. Our tele-
health service is
keeping a virtual eye
on patients showing
signs of possible
Covid-19 via a pulse
oximeter (a simple
oxygen sensor placed
on the finger) and a
digital thermometer.
If symptoms worsen,
we quickly arrange
additional care. We have moni-
tored over 500 patients so far
and have the capacity for 4,000,
with more in the works.
Covid-19 has created a global
crisis, but it has also fueled a
sudden leap toward the future
of medicine. Across the country,
we are driving changes that will
bring better health care to ev-
eryone once this nightmare fi-
nally ends.
Dr. Compton-Phillips is the chief
clinical officer of Providence, a
Catholic not-for-profit health
system with 51 hospitals. MISHA FRIEDMAN/GETTY IMAGES
suspected of infection as
though they already had
it. We shared remote
technology with col-
leagues, such as an on-
line AI tool to help pa-
tients determine for
themselves, from home,
the level of care they
need and how to get it.
The severity and sud-
denness of the Covid-19
emergency have has-
tened changes to how
we deliver care. Red
tape that initially ham-
strung the Food and
Drug Administration has
been removed to speed
the development of testing and
treatments. The Centers for
Medicare and Medicaid Services
issued waivers that allow cross-
state licensing of medical pro-
fessionals and reimbursement
for telehealth measures. We’ve
been trying to accomplish some
of these things for years, and
they all happened in the last six
weeks.
Long before Covid-19, our
team had created
a strategic plan
called “Clinical
Care 2030” to use
technology to
provide personalized, affordable
care by the end of this decade.
Those priorities are suddenly on
the fast track. We’re using tech-
nology today in ways that any
public or private health system
can do, in the current emer-
gency and in the future.
To increase intensive care ca-
pacity, our teleICU command
centers remotely monitor ICU
rooms and direct care as
Hospital staff
get tested in the
Bronx, March 24.
A New Frontier for
Medical Technology
KELSEY BRUNNER/THE ASPEN TIMES/ASSOCIATED PRESS
dubbed themselves “The Cajun Navy” and
set out to rescue neighbors.
Psychologists Ervin Staub and Johanna
Ray Vollhardt call this type of reaction “al-
truism born of suffering,” and it has sur-
prising side effects. Most important, it
leaves helpers healthier. We often think of
altruism as a transfer, in which one person
sacrifices to benefit another. But well-be-
ing is not a zero-sum game: When we de-
vote our time and money to other people,
we feel happier. In older adults, volunteer-
ing is correlated with improvements in
health and even decreased mortality.
Kindness can also decrease our stress
and soothe us in moments of great pain.
The psychologist and Holocaust survivor
Victor Frankl wrote that “suffering ceases
to be suffering at the moment it finds a
meaning, such as the meaning of a sacri-
fice.” Many survivors of assault, war and
addiction report that helping others
speeds their own recovery. They discover
strength in themselves that they might not
have noticed before; they find purpose in
what they went through and feel less help-
less. Right now, that’s exactly what many
of us need.
Hurricanes last a few hours, earthquakes
are over in minutes and some terrorist at-
tacks take place in just seconds. They are
terrifying exclamation marks in our lives,
which bring us together in a moment of
shared struggle. Then they fade, and the
lines that normally divide us
slowly reappear. The Covid-19
catastrophe will stretch out
for much longer, and the sus-
tained struggle ahead presents
an opportunity to reboot our
culture and turn this intercon-
nected moment into a habit.
Many of us yearn for
things to go back to normal.
It’s an understandable desire
but one that we should reject.
The crisis offers a chance to build a new
normal. This could mean enacting policies
to support millions as they get back on
their feet. It should also mean a shift in
our values, towards empathy and fellow-
ship instead of ruthless individualism.
I know it feels impossible, but try to
look forward to a time when the world is
no longer paralyzed by this virus. Months,
years and decades from now, the effects of
the pandemic will linger in the form of
economic strain and long-term health
problems. We will continue to need each
other more than before. We must continue
to help each other more, too.
Dr. Zaki is a professor of psychology at
Stanford University and the author of
“The War for Kindness: Building Empa-
thy in a Fractured World.”
I KNOW IT FEELS IMPOSSIBLE,but try to
think back to the ancient past—sometime
in 2019, before you had heard of the coro-
navirus. Back then, how would you have
predicted people would respond to a sud-
den global pandemic? You might have
imagined a scene from “Contagion” or
“Panic in the Streets”—mobs looting phar-
macies, neighbor ruthlessly turning on
neighbor.
In truth, some people have brawled over
now scarce items like toilet paper, but many
more have done the opposite. Covid-19 has
sparked a global epidemic of kindness. Even
while forced apart physically, countless
people have found ways to help and con-
nect with one another: deliv-
ering groceries to immuno-
compromised neighbors,
engaging in “distant socializ-
ing” with lonely older adults,
creating pop-up donation
campaigns for those in need.
Restaurants have turned
themselves into food kitchens
to serve displaced workers.
Whole cities have given
standing ovations to their
health care professionals. Lawmakers have
broached relief policies, such as eviction
freezes and temporary universal basic in-
come, which seemed unthinkable mere
weeks ago.
Disasters rip away the tidy fallacy of
self-reliance and lay bare our utter de-
pendence on each other. They shock us
into seeing our shared fragility, which is
also our shared humanity. That’s why, in
times of crisis, we are usually eager to
help strangers, in what the essayist Re-
becca Solnit has called a “carnival of
compassion.” After 9/11, people around
the U.S. stood in line for hours to donate
blood. In the af-
termath of Hurri-
cane Katrina, a
group of private
boat captains
Restaurant
workers distribute
food in Colorado,
March 17.
BYJAMILZAKI
The crisis
offers
a chance
to build
anew
normal.
pen when all of this is over? While trade,
travel and international cooperation will
surely come back from their crisis levels,
it’s not hard to see this outbreak as mark-
ing the most decisive break yet with our
globalized system.
The backlash against globalization has
been perhaps the defining political trend
of the past decade. For all the benefits it
clearly brought—low-cost production and
highly efficient capital markets—the dis-
tribution of costs in an integrated global
economy has been heavily skewed toward
the less advantaged in developed econo-
mies such as the U.S. Add to that the cul-
tural alienation felt by many of those
people as their more fortunate
and successful fellow citizens
looked down on them, and you
got the populist revolution of
2016.
After this crisis, global sup-
ply chains with limited inven-
tory will be regarded with
much more caution by CEOs
and shareholders. Nations’ need to main-
tain supplies of vital lifesaving equipment
will accelerate the repatriation of signifi-
cant production. Businesses will discover
that all that expensive international
travel that seemed so crucial can actually
be replaced by videoconferencing and
other technologies. Governments and
peoples will view each other with a last-
ing mistrust as we learn more about the
falsehoods we were told.
Above all, the renewed sense of fragil-
ity that we all feel today will surely
strengthen the bonds of national commu-
nity. We feel a special solidarity with
each other as we watch our doctors and
nurses bravely saving lives in New York
and New Orleans, just as Germans will
feel the same with theirs in Dresden and
Dortmund.
The pandemic that has struck down
the world economy is the most powerful
reminder yet that the globalized world
we have created in the last half-century is
a construct—as well as, to some extent, a
creator—of a world of peace and security.
It may not survive a less stable world.
Mr. Baker is The Journal’s
Editor at Large. ALAMY
THERE ARE NO ATHEISTSin foxholes,
it’s said, and we are learning quickly that
there are no free traders in a pandemic.
As the coronavirus spread its deadly
tentacles across Europe earlier this
month, the German government an-
nounced a ban on exports of surgical face
masks. Shipments of the masks that were
already on their way to neighboring
countries were turned back at the border.
The country that repeatedly lauds the
borderless economy and castigates those
narrow-minded nationalists who would
build walls, restrict trade and favor their
people over the interests of
“global citizens” is now hoard-
ing vital equipment to keep
Germans alive at the expense of
fellow Europeans. When it
comes to the lives of its people,
you might even say it’s Ger-
many First.
No one should be surprised
at or critical of the Germans. Any govern-
ment’s primary responsibility is to pro-
tect its citizens. Despite the grandiose
rhetoric of the most ambitious globaliz-
ers, it seems that nations still take pri-
macy over supranational ideals and insti-
tutions. Never more so than in an
emergency.
The coronavirus outbreak has sent the
world into geopolitical as well as literal,
home-based lockdown. International
travel has collapsed, subject to tight re-
strictions as countries close borders.
Trade is slumping as global supply chains
are disrupted. Capital is coming home as
investors seek safety. National govern-
ments almost everywhere are undertak-
ing massive fiscal and monetary pro-
grams to breathe some life into moribund
national economies.
Countries are seeking to do what they
can to bolster their own standing in a
moment of global panic. The U.S. points
a finger at China as the origin of the vi-
rus. China promotes absurd conspiracy
theories about the U.S. Rogue nations like
Russia and Cuba try to polish their repu-
tations with public relations stunts like
sending aid to stricken Italy.
The larger question is what will hap-
BYGERARDBAKER
Above,
national flags
outside the
U.N. building in
New York City.
REVIEW | AFTER THE PANDEMIC