52 CITY
THE WEEK 29 February 2020
Commentators
“By allaccounts, 2019 wasaterrific yearfor the stock market,”
saysMikeHofman.Yetoddly,themarketfor privatecompanies
goingpublic proved “punishing”.Lastyear, 159 companies listed
in theUS,raising$33bn,accordingtoPitchBook.Butthat’s
downnearly30%on 2018. Doubtlessenthusiasmwas dampened
bysome“headline-grabbingmisfires”:notably,WeWork’s
“yankedIPO”and thepoorperformanceof“once-celebrated
unicorns” (such asUberand Lyft)whodid makeit tomarket.
But somethingelseseems tobehappening.Agrowingchorus
of entrepreneursand venturecapitalists wantsto knockthe IPO
chessboardon thefloor,“scatter thepieces and start afresh”.
They’relookingto popularisethe “direct listing”–analternative
avenuein whichcompanies sell existingsharesratherthanissuing
new ones,cuttingWallStreetoutof the equation altogether.Some
say directlistingsare“less rigorous”thanIPOs,and so“ripefor
abuse”.Anupcoming lawsuitinvolving Slack will test thatnotion.
Butwecouldbewitnessing the end oftheIPOas we know it.
Thereareplentyofplaceswhereinvestorshavefearedfar-left
socialistgovernments,saysMatthewLynn.ButtheUnitedStates?
Thehomeoffreeenterprisehasneverevenhadamainstream
socialdemocraticparty,andwassurelyoneplace“nobodyhadto
worryabout”.Notanymore.TheveteransocialistBernieSanders
isnowtheclearleaderfortheDemocraticnominationinthis
year’spresidentialelection,andmarketsaregoingtohavetostart
workingoutthe“potentialconsequences”.Sandershasargued
for wealthtaxes,curbsonWallStreet, workers’representation
on companyboards andmassive programmes“thatcouldalmost
doublegovernment spending”. Hisradical policies would have
ahugeimpacton the globaleconomy–wemightexpect“the
dollarto bedethroned”, equitymarketsto tumble, and “a
massiveexodusfromWallStreet” forstarters.Justweeks ago,
Sanders’snominationseemed “unimaginable”. Butanycountry
thatcanelect someoneas“extreme”asTrumpcouldcertainly
electSanderstoo–particularlyiftheeconomyisheadingdown-
wards.Comethesummer,investorsmaybe fearingtheworst.
PresidentTrumphasbeeninIndia,heapingpraiseonitsleader,
NarendraModi.Butthecountryis“facingtwineconomicand
politicalcrises”,saysMartinWolf.Politicshastakenan“aggress-
ivelyilliberal”turn,intheteethofa“dramatic”slowdownin
growthsincethe 2008 financialcrisis.Peerbeneaththeofficial
statistics,andannualgrowthhasaveraged 4 .5%accordingto
credibleestimates–verypoorbyrecentIndianstandards.“A
viciousspiralisatwork”:highinterestratesandlowprofitability
are“worseningdebtburdensandsoaggravatingtheproblems”
formanyfirms.Yetthegovernment’sresponse“seemstobeto
denytheevidenceofaslowdown”.Byallaccounts,“thebest
advisershavemostlygone”,leavingpolicy-makingconcentrated
withinModi’soffice.It’sessentialforIndia’sfuturethatgrowth
risesabove7%.That’sahugechallengerequiringmanyreforms,
reliabledataandopendebate.Aneasieralternativetothetough
businessofrevitalisingtheeconomyisrelianceonbelligerent
Hindu“identitypolitics”.“Thatseemstobethecurrentchoice.”
“Espionage andbusinesshavelongbeen entangled,” says
Schumpeter. The history ofspying is litteredwith casesof front
companies beingusedfor“covertskulduggery”. But few areas
“remarkable” as thatofCrypto AG–the Swisscompany that
oncedominatedthe global market forciphermachines.The firm,
it turns out, wasownedby the CIAfor decades, meaning the US
could listenin on foreign governments’secret communications.A
leaked CIA reportcalled it “the intelligencecoupofthe century”.
Today,“theprivatesector is moreimportant tospooks than
ever”: techgiants hold more personal data than thestate, and
governmentswant access to it. In these days ofbiometric border
controls,spies are placedinrealfirms so theycan travel under
their ownnameswith cover. “Yet cloak-and-dagger arrangements
cango badlywrong.” Companiesthatcollaboratewith spiesput
employees at risk. Andthe British engineering firmFerrantiwent
bankruptafterbuying ISC–aUS arms contractor“that turned
out tobe aCIA frontfor rampantgun-running”.Thespooks’
gratitudewas“scant consolationfor aggrievedshareholders”.
TheBarclayfamily
“WeallrememberTolstoy
saying‘eachunhappyfamily
isunhappyinitsownway’,”
notedDesmondBrowneQC
intheHighCourtthisweek.
Butwhowouldhave
guessedthatthefamilies
oftheBarclaytwins–retail
billionaireswhoseempire
alsoincorporatesthe
Telegraphnewspapergroup
andTheRitzHotel–would
falloutsospectacularly?Ina
squabbleoverfamilyassets,
SirFrederickBarclay, 85
(pictured),andhisdaughter
Amandaaresuingthethree
sons(Alistair,Aidanand
Howard)andthegrandson
ofhistwinbrother,SirDavid,
forbuggingtheconservatory
ofTheRitzover“several
months”torecordtheir
privateconversations,said
theFT.Thematteronlycame
tolightrecentlywhenAlistair
Barclaywasfilmedlateat
night“handlingthebug”in
theconservatory,towhich
SirFrederickwaswontto
repair“tosmokeacigar”.
TheBarclaysboasta
combinedwealthof£8bn,
accordingtoTheSunday
Times:theyowntheVery
andLittlewoodswebsites
andthedeliveryfirmYodel.
The day-to-day running of
the empire has long been
handled by Sir David’s sons,
Aidan and Howard, said The
Guardian. But now, amid
mounting losses, the family
silver is up for sale, and as
the court was told this week,
“cousin, sadly, has been
pitched against cousin”.
The divisions apparently
emerged last year when The
Telegraph was put up for
sale. Still, it’sacoupofsorts,
said Alistair Osborne in The
Times. Who’d have thought,
alongside all their other
achievements, the Barclays
would produceatwis ton
theboard gameCluedo?The
culprit, this time, was “in the
conservatory with the bug”.
India is in
the grip of
two crises
MartinWolf
FinancialTimes
Don’t rule
out the threat
from Bernie
MatthewLynn
TheDailyTelegraph
The end of
the IPO as
we know it?
Mike Hofman
Marker.Medium.com
Uncovering
the business
of spying
Schumpeter
The Economist
City profile