108 Origins
status
played
a
major
roleinthe
early
social
history
oftheMus-
lim
community.
In
Marwanidtimes,mawlareferredtotwo
dis-
tinct
types
of
person,
theslavemawlaandthefreemawla.The
slavemawla (mawl wal’)was a slavewho was
subsequently
freedandwhocontractedawal’
(client)relationship
withhis
oldmasterinaccordancewithIslamiclaw.Mostslaveswhowere
freedhad
already
convertedtoIslam.Thefreemawla(mawl
muwl{h)
wasamemberofthe
conquered(thatis,non-Arabian)
populations
whohadconvertedtoIslam.
Uponconverting,
hetoo
contractedawal’
rela.tionship
withhis
patron,
anArabian.The
wal’
ofthefreedmanandthatofthefreemandifferedonlyin
minor
details,
andtheirsocial
standing
was
comparable.
The bestefforts of
twentieth-century
researchershave not
succeededin
distinguishing
one
type
ofmawlafromtheother.
The
historical
sourcescallmost
persons
merely"mawla,"
with-
out
providing
informationaboutwhether
they
wereslaveor
free.Fora
study
of
slavery,
theneedto
distinguish
betweenthe
twokindsofmawla
appears
tobeof
paramountimportance;
but
I
argue
elsewhere
2
that
nearly
all
mawlaswhofoughtintheearly
Islamic
period
eitherhadslave
origins
or
experienced
some-
thingvery
similar.The
reasoning
behindthisisasfollows.
For
analyzing
themawla
status,
the
earlyperiod
ofIslamic
history
divides into three eras, the
Muh.
ammadan
(1-13/
622-34),Arabian (13-132/634-750),andfirstAbbasid (129-
205/747-820). In thefirst, a count shows thatfive-sixthsof
identifiedmawlaswereslavemawlas;inthethird,thefreemawla
status
disappeared,
sothe
overwhelmingmajority
ofmawlashad
slave
origins.
Thesecond(Arabian)
period
isthemost
complex,
forbothslaveandfreemawlas
appear
tohaveexistedin
quan-
tity.
Closeexaminationofmawlasinthat
period
reveals that
they
shared
manysignificant
characteristics. Onthebasisofthese
common features, Iconclude thatallmawlasin theArabian
period
hada
single
social
status;in
chapter
6,I
argue
thatfor
mawlaswho
fought,
theirstatuswasservile.Thus,inallthree
erasofmawla
development,
mostofthose
engaged
inwarfare
2.Ibid.