TheUnfreeinMuslim
Warfare,
2-2051624-820 119
to
Mu.seab
b.az-Zubayr,thebrotherofIbn
az-Zubayr.
Mus.eab
at
firstintendedtokillall ofal-Mukhtfir’smawlasoldierswhile
sparing
theArabians,butwhenhis
companions
decriedthisas
un-Islamic,
heexecutedthemall.
66
Besides
showing
a
strong
antimawla
feeling,
thisindicatesthe
importance
ofmawlasin
al-Mukhtfir’sforces.
AI-MukhtSr’s useofmawlas has attracted much
attention;
historians consider his reliance on unfree soldiers
unprece-
dented.
67
Whilehe
depended
onthem
heavily,
a
glance
atother
armiesinthesecondcivilwarshowsthatall
partiesemployed
themtoan
unprecedented
extent.Thenotionthatal-Mukhtr
receivedmawla
support
inreturnfor
championing
theirclaims
to
equality
doesnotstand
up
totheevidence,
especially
tothe
factthat
many
unfreesoldiers
foughtagainst
al-Mukhtfir.In-
deed, al-Mukhtr himselfmay havebeen killed by
a
mawla
fighting
onIbnaz-Zubayr’sbehalf.
68
Hadtherebeenanideo-
logical
commitment to the mawlas onal-MukhtSr’s
part,
he
would
scarcelyhavebeenkilledbyoneofthem.
2.
Ibn
az-Zubayr,
almost
simultaneously
with al-Mukhtfir’s
rebellion
(and
also
goadedinto
action
byal-H.usayn
b.CAli’s
deathatKarbal’in
61/680),
declaredhimself
caliph
inMeccain
61/681.Unfreesoldiers
fought
inhis
early
battles
against
the
Umayyads--though the sources are
not
entirely clear
as
to
whose side
theyfought
on.
9
In
particular,
amawla,Yazidb.
Hurmuzleda
corps
ofmawlasat
al-H.
arrain63/683,
70
where
"they
wereentrustedwiththedefenseof[a]sectionoftheditch.
Theirforcewasdividedintosquadrons(karch-s)
positioned
behind each other.
They
were assaulted
by
a unit of the
[Umayyad]army
andcalled
upon
tosurrender;thecommander,
66.T,2:749-50;AA,5:263.
67.Zaydn,4:87-88;Kubbel,
p.
118;Cahen,Peuplesmusulmans,
pp
115-16:
Watt,
p.
162;
al-Kharbfi.tli,
al-Mukhtr,
p.
286;CHI,4:37.These
opinions
are
largelybasedontheinformation
in
T,1:649-51, 721 (translatedonpp.198-200
of"FromMawlato
Mamluk").
68.AA,5:262.
69.Khalifa,pp.304,313;IS,5:62-63.
70.AA,4b:35;IS,5:209,7:1.160.