xxiv
Introduction
thefirst
twocenturiesofIslamdatesfromlatertimesandis
open
todoubt;how
credibleistheinformationonslavesinwarfare?
Any
historiographicalanalysis
of
thesourcesforthefirsttwo
centuriesofIslammust
begin
with
recognition
of
afundamental
fact:we
are
dealing
herewithoraltradition,
z’
Withfew
excep-
tions,alltheinformationon
this
period
wasfirst
compiled
inthe
3d/9th
or
subsequentcenturies,oftentwohundred
years
after
theeventshadoccurred.
Obviously,
the
useofsuchmaterialsis
fraught
with
pitfalls.
A
methodology
fi)rthe
historicaluseoforal
traditionshasbeen
recentlydeveloped
andcanserveasa
guide.
Although
it does not deal
with Islamicate sources from a
thousand
yearsago,
butwithoral
traditionscollectedincontem-
porarynonliteratesocieties,
especially
in
Africa,
this
methodol-
ogy
has
perfect
validity
forour
purposes;
the
major
difference
is
thatIslamicate
traditionswere notwrittendown
by
alienre-
searchersbut
by
Muslims
themselves,adistinct
advantage
for
ourmaterial,
z
Giventhe
natureoforaltraditions,itis
possible
to
accept
in-
formationabout
slavesinwarfareatfacevalue.Thisissobe-
cause
(1)
chroniclershad
nointerestin
distorting
this
particular
infi)rmation
andso
(2)
the
inaccuraciesoftheiraccountsdonot
seriouslyflawthe
generalpicture
whichthis
study
attempts
to
draw.
Oraltraditions are
particularly susceptible
to distortion,so
howdoesonetakethisinto
account?
Itis
absolutely
essentialtofindoutwhat
purpose
a
traditionisused
for,soastobe
ableto
judge
thekindoffalsificationit
mayhave
undergone..,
sometimesitis
possible
to
provide
proof
thata
given
traditionis
unlikely
tohavebeen
falsified.Acasein
point
iswherea
A. Noth, "Zum Verhiltnis von
kalifaler
Zentralgewalt
und Provinzenin
umayyadischer
Zeit,"
writes:"Thelarger
part
ofthetraditions
dealing
withthe
first
caliphs
was
originally
not--or
almostnot--dated.The
arrangement
offacts
in
thehijra
chronology
alater
systematization"(p.41).
P.
CroneandM.
Cook,Hagarism:The
Making
of
thellamicWorld
(London,1977),part1.
25.Foradifferent
view,seeU.
Sezgin,
Ab
Mnaf:
ein
Beitrag Historiog-
raphie
der
umaiyadischen
Zeit
(Leiden,1971).
26.
J.
Vansina,OralTradition:A
Study
1
HistoricalMethodology,trans.H.M.
Wright(London,1965),
appendix.