The Wall Street Journal - 22.02.2020 - 23.02.2020

(Axel Boer) #1

B12| Saturday/Sunday, February 22 - 23, 2020 **** THE WALL STREET JOURNAL.


A conglomerate backed by
an elite Beijing university
missed a key debt payment in
China, potentially triggering
defaults on $3 billion of inter-
national bonds.
The failure to repay on-
shore bondholders came days
after a team of regulators and
other senior officials was ap-
pointed to restructure Peking
University Founder Group.
Late on Friday, the Shang-
hai Clearing House said it
hadn’t received payment for
the 2 billion yuan ($284 mil-
lion) of onshore notes from
Peking Founder, and so it
couldn’t handle payments to
creditors.
Such a failure to pay by Pe-
king Founder could trigger a
cross-default of its $3 billion
of offshore bonds, according
to a prospectus for one of
those securities.
Sandra Chow, head of Asia
Pacific at research firm Credit-
Sights, said that would typi-
cally require offshore bond-
holders to formally call an
event of default.
If that happens this would
be the third international de-
fault by a state-backed Chi-
nese company in just months,
after more than two decades
in which no state-owned en-
terprises inflicted losses on
offshore investors.
In December, holders of
dollar bonds issued by Tianjin-
based commodity trader
Tewoo Group were offered
new debt or cash for their se-
curities, at steep haircuts to
the debt’s face value.
A similar discounted debt
purchase was offered this
month to creditors of alumi-
num maker Qinghai Provincial
Investment Group.
Peking Founder has been
experiencing financial difficul-
ties since last year. It first
failed to repay the 2 billion
yuan of bonds when they ma-
tured on Dec. 1. It later said it
would repay the debt within a
15-day grace period and then
persuaded bondholders to ex-
tend the deadline to this Fri-
day.
However, Peking Founder
said on Wednesday that a Bei-
jing court had approved an ap-
plication to restructure the
company, made by an onshore
creditor. The court appointed
a team including representa-
tives of the central bank, other
financial regulators, the local
government and the ministry
of education, to handle the re-
organization.
In a note on Thursday,
CreditSights analysts said the
presence of heavyweight state
institutions could speed up the
restructuring, which could in-
flict financial pain on some
creditors.
Peking Founder’s offshore
bonds were already trading far
below face value, indicating
investors doubt they will be
repaid in full.
Peking University Founder
Group, majority-owned by the
school, for years used its re-
search prowess, elite connec-
tions and implicit state back-
ing to expand in industries
from electronics to commodi-
ties trading and health-care
services. International inves-
tors helped fund the rapid
growth by buying up the
group’s debt as recently as
last summer.

BYXIEYU

Chinese


Bond Issuer


On Brink


Of Default


most valuable startups. But
since then the e-cigarette
maker has been battered by
lawsuits, regulatory crack-
downs and investigations into
whether it marketed its prod-
ucts to underage children and
teenagers.
Blamed for a surge in un-
derage vaping, the startup vol-
untarily pulled most of its fla-
vors from the U.S. market and
scaled back its international
expansion.
The SEC has issued subpoe-
nas to Altria and Juul and
both companies have re-
sponded, some of the people
said. Juul has turned over doc-
uments including correspon-
dence with Altria and financial
projections Juul shared with
Altria before the deal, one of
the people said.
The SEC is a civil regulator
that enforces U.S. investor-

protection laws and account-
ing rules. Its enforcement arm
has questioned whether public
companies adequately dis-
closed the risks of big invest-
ments and moved quickly
enough to reduce the value of
impaired assets.
Announcing the second
write-down in January, Altria
Chief Executive Howard Wil-
lard said he was “highly disap-
pointed in the performance of
our Juul investment.”
He was pressed on the wis-
dom of the deal this week by
shareholders and analysts in a
private session at an analyst
conference in Florida, accord-
ing to a person who attended
the event. Mr. Willard said Al-
tria had recently revised its
agreement with Juul and the
new deal had the full support
of Altria’s board, this person
said.

Securities regulators have
opened a probe related toAl-
tria GroupInc.’s investment in
controversial e-cigarette
startupJuul LabsInc., accord-
ing to people familiar with the
matter.
The Securities and Ex-
change Commission is investi-
gating whether Altria ade-
quately disclosed to
shareholders the risks when it
spent $12.8 billion in 2018 to
take a 35% stake in Juul, the
people said.
The tobacco giant in Janu-
ary took a $4.1 billion charge
on its Juul stake, following a
$4.5 billion write-down in Oc-
tober.
Altria’s investment initially
valued Juul at $38 billion,
making it one of the country’s

BYJENNIFERMALONEY
ANDDAVEMICHAELS

SEC Probes Altria’s Juul Stake


case is about “bribery, pure
and simple."
Specifically, he said, Mr.
Lindberg promised $2 million
in campaign money for the re-
placement of a senior regulator
who was overseeing Mr. Lind-
berg’s insurers with someone
he deemed more favorable. He
needed “a clean bill of health”
for his life insurers so he could
make more acquisitions to fur-
ther expand his conglomerate,
Mr. Mann said in his opening
statement.
A self-proclaimed billionaire,
Mr. Lindberg bought life insur-
ers in the U.S. and abroad be-
ginning in 2014 and lent at
least $2 billion of their assets
to entities he controlled. North
Carolina regulators took con-
trol of four of the insurers last
June, and those insurers have

since asked a state court to ap-
point a receiver over hundreds
of Mr. Lindberg’s private enti-
ties that owe them money.
Mr. Lindberg’s insurance
empire was the focus of a Feb-
ruary 2019 investigative article
in The Wall Street Journal. A
separate federal probe is con-
tinuing to investigate potential
fraud in Mr. Lindberg’s busi-
ness dealings, filings show.
The bribery trial began
Tuesday with selection of ju-
rors, in a case that could bring
up to 20 years of jail on one
charge, and 10 years on an-
other.
This week, Mr. Lindberg has
spent hours quietly sitting at a
table flanked by lawyers. Two
co-defendants are at adjacent
tables, each with at least three
attorneys.

In another sign of the large
amount of money being spent
on defense, four mock jurors
are sitting in the courtroom to
give feedback to Mr. Lindberg’s
team.
The setting is a wood-pan-
eled, high-ceilinged courtroom
rich in history, but it lacks big
screens and other modern
technology for viewing and lis-
tening to the dozens of secretly
recorded videos and phone
calls that form the core of the
government’s case. Those vid-
eos and phone calls were re-
corded in 2018 by Mr. Causey,
under the direction of federal
officials.
With prosecutors, defen-
dants, their lawyers and jurors
focused on small screens, the
government has played about a
dozen recordings so far. De-
fense lawyers are expected to
question Mr. Causey Monday,
seeking to persuade jurors that
he overstepped boundaries pro-
hibiting authorities from induc-
ing people into wrongdoing, so-
called entrapment.
The recordings came about
after Mr. Causey, who was
elected in November 2016, ap-
proached federal officials in
late 2017 with concerns about
the Lindberg insurers’ unortho-
dox investment strategy. He
was also unnerved because Mr.
Lindberg’s consultant, John D.
Gray, who is a co-defendant,
had told him that Mr. Lindberg
wanted to aid his 2020 re-elec-
tion, he testified this week.
So far in the recordings, ju-
rors have heard Messrs.Lind-
berg and Gray repeatedly criti-
cize the deputy commissioner
who was overseeing the Lind-
berg insurers. They told the
commissioner they supported

robust and stringent regula-
tion, but the deputy was un-
qualified to understand the in-
surers’ investments. She
was “ruining my reputation”
with other state regulators
with malicious statements, Mr.
Lindberg asserted.
Mr. Causey has said publicly
that the deputy, Jackie Obusek,
is a knowledgeable and able
regulator. In the recordings, Mr.
Causey defended Ms. Obusek as
well-intentioned as she pushed
for more detail about Mr. Lind-
berg’s investments. But he told
the businessman he was open
to replacing her—and thus
came the question about how
he would benefit.
From then on, Mr. Causey
repeatedly asked Messrs. Lind-
berg and Gray about the size
and nature of contributions to

aid his 2020 re-election.
At first, Mr. Lindberg sug-
gested Mr. Causey hire one of
his employees, a former Inter-
national Business Machines
Corp. executive named John V.
Palermo Jr., now the third co-
defendant. Some weeks later,
Messrs. Lindberg and Causey
deemed Mr. Palermo’s hiring
problematic, and discussed
transferring oversight of his in-
surers to another insurance-de-
partment deputy commissioner.
—Mark Maremont
contributed to this article.

CHARLOTTE, N.C.—Lawyers
for insurance mogul Greg Lind-
berg this past week began their
fight in court against federal
bribery charges by telling ju-
rors that the executive believed
he was staying within elections
law as he made political contri-
butions to counter what he per-
ceived as overly tough regula-
tion.
A lawyer for Mr. Lindberg,
Brandon McCarthy, said in an
opening statement that the
businessman’s donations were
prompted by a question from
North Carolina Insurance Com-
missioner Mike Causey at one
early meeting: “What’s in it for
me?”
But U.S. government lawyer
James C. Mann told jurors the


BYLESLIESCISM


Insurance Tycoon’s Bribery Trial Gets Started


derlines its growing reputa-
tion as a forceful and some-
times unconventional investor.
The fund manages $256 bil-
lion of pension savings, rank-
ing as the country’s second-
largest pension manager after
Canada Pension Plan Invest-
ment Board.
A spokeswoman for the
Caisse declined to comment.
Other Bombardier investors
haven’t fared as well. Bombar-
dier’s stock has plunged to
1.25 Canadian dollars
(US$0.95) since the stock hit a
five-year peak in 2018 on the

Toronto Stock Exchange.
There was so much disap-
pointment with Alstom’s offer
on Monday to pay as much as
$4.5 billion in mostly cash
and shares to Bombardier’s
remaining holders that Bom-
bardier’s stock has since
dropped about 32%, lowering
its market value to $2.58 bil-
lion.
The Caisse has agreed to
invest about $755 million to
acquire an 18% stake in the
French train maker, when the
takeover closes. The stake will
make it the largest investor in

a combined train company
that will be more than twice
the size of Bombardier.
“This is a big win for the
Caisse. It invested directly in
the train business and got
guarantees,” said Dan Fong,
an analyst with Veritas Invest-
ment Research.
Until recently the fund had
mixed results investing in lo-
cal businesses. Critics long
saw the Caisse as the financial
arm of the Quebec govern-
ment. The Caisse adopted a
more global and disciplined
investment strategy after the

financial crisis, when the pen-
sion manager was rocked by a
$40 billion decline in net as-
sets after its bets on asset-
backed securities soured.
Today, nearly a quarter of
its net assets are invested in
infrastructure projects and
private-equity deals, most of
them outside of Canada.
Closer to home, it is financing
about half a nearly $5 billion
project to build and operate a
42-mile commuter-rail system
in Montreal, the city’s biggest
transit project in more than
half a century.

BUSINESS & FINANCE


Quebec’s giant pension-
fund manager is poised to
earn a $1 billion profit from
AlstomSA’s planned takeover
of Bombardier Inc.’s train
business, thanks to an unusual
deal it struck four years ago.
TheCaisse de dépôt et
placement du Québecowes
its big gain to terms it de-
manded in 2016 when it paid
$1.5 billion for what is now a
32.5% stake in the train divi-
sion. At the time, Bombardier
was so stretched for cash to
finance plane and train orders
delayed by production issues
that the Caisse was one of the
few institutions willing to
back the company.
As part of the investment,
the pension-fund manager ne-
gotiated a guaranteed 15% an-
nual compounded return on
its investment to be paid if
control of the company
changed hands. Alstom has
agreed to buy the Caisse’s
stake as part of a planned
purchase of the Bombardier
unit, which is set to close next
year. The Caisse stands to
earn a return of nearly 70% on
its investment, or a total of
$2.5 billion from the sale of
its stake, the guarantee and
dividends.
“It was a very expensive
debt,” said Alain Bellemare,
Bombardier’s chief executive.
The Caisse’s investment
gain from the struggling
transportation company un-


BYJACQUIEMCNISH


Quebec Fund Set for Big Payday


The Caisse, a pension


fund, is poised to reap


$1 billion from Alstom-


Bombardier deal


Alstom’s planned takeover of Bombardier’s train division is a boon for pension-fund manager the Caisse de dépôt et placement du Québec.

DENIS BALIBOUSE/REUTERS

Greg Lindberg made
contributions to the
campaign of a North
Carolina regulator.
BUSINESS OPPORTUNITIES COMMERCIAL REAL ESTATE

   



  
 
   

  
    

  

     
 

 
 
 
  
 
  

 
 !"#
 
   

 
   $
  %

 
 &'( )   
   

$    

   
#

*%% +
, 

   

 
 

 
  






 





   

  
 
  

    

 



 

  



 

    

   



  

  

!"#$
 !

    
  
  
 


 


        

    
     



 







 !" # $%



  



 







NOTICE OF SALE

   
 

    
   

 
 
 
 !""#
$
 %
 & 



 

    
 
 

 
 



        
 

   
 
 
   
  
 
 
 



  !"


#


$%&'()**'$

TRAVEL

    
#
 
 
  #





 



   



PRODUCTS

    



 
 
 
 
  
  


!""#$%

%
"&'()(**

The Marketplace


ADVERTISEMENT

To advertise: 800-366-3975 or WSJ.com/classifieds

TRAVEL

&'&( & 


    
 


  
    

& )  

    
    ! "
 !

 "
   
!#
    $ 
  "#  
%  !-&&


 
*


  




 
*
++   !"#$

ADVERTISE TODAY

THE
MARKETPLACE

(800) 366-3975
For more information visit:
wsj.com/classifieds

© 2020 Dow Jones & Company, Inc.
All Rights Reserved.
Free download pdf