112 CHAPTER 3 HOW MARKETING COMMUNICATIONS WORK
Fig u r e 3.17 Evolution of Club Med word-of-mouth quality during the campaign
Figure 3.18 Recognition, correct attribution and useful
score of the De Morgen newspaper campaign
Moving in the right direction
After the campaign, in June 2011, key indicators of effective-
ness were measured. Brand awareness did not change after
the campaign. Club Med maintained its high awareness
score of more than 90%, and is still equally as well
known as its competitors. General brand attitude improved:
among families with kids, the brand opinion of Club Med
is significantly less neutral and more favourable than in
the previous measurement (March 2010) (Figure 3.19).
In 2010, 27% of the respondents found Club Med ‘some-
what less expensive’. In June 2011, this decreased to 18%.
Although not impressive, the price perception evolved
in the desired direction. Similarly the ‘value for money’
perception had improved. In 2010, 28% felt that Club
Med was good value for money. In 2011, this had in -
creased to 33%. The brand associations in terms of the
attributes put forward as important did not significantly
change between March 2010 and June 2011. The image
thus largely stayed the same, and the campaign did not
succeed in altering the perception of the core target group
(Figure 3.20).
The commercial results of Club Med also evolved
positively. After two years of severe decline in Flanders, the
number of customers slightly increased in 2011 (Figure 3.21).
Similarly, turnover substantially increased after two years of
substantial decline (Figure 3.22). Combining the recruit-
ment and sales figures leads to the conclusion that sales
primarily increased as a result of a higher unit price per
holiday sold.
M03_PELS3221_05_SE_C03.indd 112 6/5/13 3:03 PM