118 CHAPTER 3 HOW MARKETING COMMUNICATIONS WORK(^95) Janiszewski, C. and Meyvis, T. (2001), ‘Effects of Brand
Logo Complexity, Repetition, and Spacing on Processing
Fluency and Judgment’, Journal of Consumer Research, 28
(June), 18–32.
(^96) Ferraro, R., Bettman, J.R. and Chartrand, T.L. (2009),
‘The Power of Strangers: The Effect of Incidental Consumer
Brand Encounters on Brand Choice’, Journal of Consumer
Research, 35(5), 729–41.
(^97) Hoyer, W.C. and MacInnis, D.J. (2001), Consumer
Behaviour. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
(^98) Berlyne, D.E. (1970), ‘Novelty, Complexity, and Hedonic
Value’, Perception and Psychophysics, 8 (November), 279–
86.
(^99) Van Kerckhove, A., Vermeir, I. and Geuens, M. (2008),
‘Combined Influence of Selective Focus and Decision
Involvement on Attitude-behaviour Consistency in a
Context of Memory-based Decision Making’, in Perks,
K.J. and Shukla, P. (eds), Marketing Landscapes: A Pause
for Thought, Proceedings of the 37th Annual Conference of
the European Marketing Academy (EMAC), Brighton.
(^100) Deighton, J., Henderson, C.M. and Neslin, S.A. (1994),
‘The Effects of Advertising on Brand Switching and Repeat
Purchasing’, Journal of Marketing Research, 31, 28–43.
(^101) Hall, B.F. (2002), ‘A New Model for Measuring Advertising
Effectiveness’, Journal of Advertising Research, 42 (March/
April), 23–31.
(^102) Kempf, D.S. and Laczniak, R.N. (2001), ‘Advertising’s
Influence on Subsequent Product Trial Processing’,
Journal of Advertising, 30(3), 27–38.
(^103) Hall, B.F. (2002), ‘A New Model for Measuring Advertising
Effectiveness’, Journal of Advertising Research, 42 (March/
April), 23–31.
(^104) Kempf, D.S. and Laczniak, R.N. (2001), ‘Advertising’s
Influence on Subsequent Product Trial Processing’,
Journal of Advertising, 30(3), 27–38.
(^105) Keller, K.L. (2008), Building, Measuring, and Managing
Brand Equity, 3rd edition. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice
Hall.
(^106) Deighton, J., Henderson, J.M. and Neslin, S.A. (1994),
‘The Effects of Advertising on Brand Switching and Repeat
Purchasing’, Journal of Marketing Research, 31(2), 28–43.
(^107) Kempf, D.S. and Laczniak, R.N. (2001), ‘Advertising’s
Influence on Subsequent Product Trial Processing’, Journal
of Advertising, 30(3), 27–38.
(^108) Clancy, K.J. and Trout, J. (2002), ‘Brand Confusion’,
Harvard Business Review, 80(3), 22.
(^109) Ehrenberg, A.S.C. (1974), ‘Repetititve Advertising and
the Consumer’, Journal of Advertising Research, 14 (April),
25–34; Vakratsas, D. and Ambler, T. (1999), ‘What Do We
Really Know?’, Journal of Marketing, 63 (January), 26–43.
(^110) Bamossy, S. and Hogg, A. (2007), Consumer Behaviour:
A European Perspective, 3rd edition. Harlow: Pearson
Education.
(^111) Hoyer, W.D. (1984), ‘An Examination of Consumer
Decision Making for a Common Repeat Purchase Product’,
Journal of Consumer Research, 11, 822–9.
(^112) Aaker, D.A. and Bruzzone, D.E. (1985), ‘Causes of Irritation
in Advertising’, Journal of Marketing, 49 (Spring), 47–57.
(^113) De Pelsmacker, P. and Van den Bergh, J. (1998), ‘Ad
Content, Product Category, Campaign Weight and Irritation:
A Study of 226 TV Commercials’, Journal of International
Consumer Marketing, 10(4), 5–27.
(^114) Pasadeos, Y. (1990), ‘Perceived Informativeness of and
Irritation with Local Advertising’, Journalism Quarterly,
67, 35–9.
(^115) Edwards, S.M., Li, H. and Lee, J.H. (2002), ‘Forced
Exposure and Psychological Reactance: Antecedents and
Consequences of the Perceived Intrusiveness of Pop-Up
A d s ’, Journal of Advertising, 31(3), 83–95.
(^116) Aaker, D.A. and Bruzzone, D.E. (1985), ‘Causes of
Irritation in Advertising’, Journal of Marketing, 49 (Spring),
47–57; De Pelsmacker, P. and Van den Bergh, J. (1998),
‘Ad Content, Product Category, Campaign Weight and
Irritation: A Study of 226 TV Commercials’, Journal of
International Consumer Marketing, 10(4), 5–27.
(^117) De Pelsmacker, P. and Van den Bergh, J. (1998), ‘Ad
Content, Product Category, Campaign Weight and Irritation:
A Study of 226 TV Commercials’, Journal of International
Consumer Marketing, 10(4), 5–27.
(^118) Pechmann, C. and Stewart, D.W. (1990), Advertising Repeti
tion: A Critical Review of WearIn and WearOut, Working
paper. Cambridge, MA: Marketing Science Institute.
(^119) Cox, D.S. and Cox, A.D. (1988), ‘What Does Familiarity
Breed? Complexity as a Moderator of Repetition Effects
in Advertisement Evaluation’, Journal of Consumer Research,
15, 111–16; Anand, P. and Sternthal, B. (1990), ‘Ease of
Message Processing as a Moderator of Repetition Effects
in Advertising’, Journal of Marketing Research, 27, 345–53;
Schumann, D.W., Petty, R.E. and Clemons, D.S. (1990),
‘Predicting the Effectiveness of Different Strategies of
Advertising Variation: A Test of the Repetition-Variation
Hypothesis’, Journal of Consumer Research, 17, 192–202.
(^120) De Pelsmacker, P. and Van den Bergh, J. (1998), ‘Ad
Content, Product Category, Campaign Weight and
Irritation: A Study of 226 TV Commercials’, Journal of
International Consumer Marketing, 10(4), 5–27.
(^121) Fennis, B.M. and Bakker, A.B. (2001), ‘Stay Tuned – We
Will Be Back after These Messages: Need to Evaluate
Moderates the Transfer of Irritation in Advertising’,
Journal of Advertising, 15(3), 15–25.
(^122) De Pelsmacker, P. and Geuens, M. (1997), ‘Affect Intensity
and the General Attitude Towards Advertising’, in De
Pelsmacker, P. and Geuens, M. (eds), The Changing World
of Marketing and Corporate Communication, Proceedings
of the Second International Conference on Marketing and
Corporate Communication. Antwerp: RUCA, 60–2.
(^123) Moore, D.L. and Hutchinson, J.W. (1983), ‘The Effect
of Ad Affection Advertising Effectiveness’, Advances in
Consumer Research, 10, 526–31.
(^124) Burke, M.C. and Edell, J.A. (1989), ‘The Impact of Feelings
on Ad-Based Affect and Cognition’, Journal of Marketing
Research, 26, 69–83; Stayman, D.M. and Aaker, D.A.
(1988), ‘Are All the Effects of Ad-Induced Feelings
Mediated by Aad?’, Journal of Consumer Research, 15,
368–73; Aaker, D.A. and Bruzzone, D.E. (1985), ‘Causes
of Irritation in Advertising’, Journal of Marketing, 49
M03_PELS3221_05_SE_C03.indd 118 6/5/13 3:03 PM