214 CHAPTER 7 ADVERTISING
Figure 7.4 Most frequently used information cues in advertising
Source : Based on Abernethy, A.M. and Franke, G.R. (1996), ‘The Information Content of Advertising: A Meta-Analysis’, Journal
of Advertising , 25(2), 1–17.
Table 7.3 Resnik and Stern’s information classification
z Price
z Quality
z Performance
z Components
z Availability
z Special
z Taste
z Nutrition
z Packaging
z Warranties
z offers
z Independent research
z Company research
z New ideas
z Safety
Source : Based on Abernethy, A.M. and Franke, G.R. (1996), ‘The Information Content of Advertising: A Meta-Analysis’, Journal
of Advertising , 25(2), 1–17.
Abernethy and Franke performed a meta-analysis on 59 studies in 24 diff erent countries,
including the USA, most Western countries and the Pacifi c Rim, in which this classifi cation
had been used, and revealed the following.^32 Th e mean number of information cues (over the
diff erent countries and over diff erent media) is 2.04, and the cues most frequently used are
performance (in 43% of the cases), availability (37%), components (33%), price (25%), quality
(19%) and special off ers (13%) ( Figure 7.4 ).
As might be expected, ads for durable goods contain signifi cantly more information cues
than ads for non-durable goods (2.7 versus 2.0). Ads in developed countries (the USA,
Canada, Southern and Western Europe, Japan, Australia, New Zealand) are more informative
than ads in less developed countries (China, Taiwan, South Korea, India, Saudi Arabia, parts
of Latin America). Another study showed that rational appeals are more eff ective than emo-
tional appeals when a product is new to the market, while the opposite holds true in markets
in which consumers are already very familiar with the product.^33 Moreover, ads for intangible
products (e.g. services) contain more information cues than for tangible products. Th e same
conclusion holds for low as compared with high competitive markets.^34 One study shows that
a diagnostic product element (= information that helps consumers to assess product quality)
stimulates message involvement and enhances ad and brand evaluations for high, but not for
low Need for Cognition individuals (i.e. consumers that do not like to engage in cognitive
activities). Two diagnostic information elements, however, did not further improve involve-
ment or evaluations as compared with one information element, leading to the conclusion
that one diagnostic information element seems suffi cient.^35 Finally, the level of information
varies between diff erent advertising media (see also Chapter 8 ).
M07_PELS3221_05_SE_C07.indd 214M07_PELS3221_05_SE_C07.indd 214 6/5/13 3:01 PM6/5/13 3:01 PM