286 CHAPTER 8 MEDIA PLANNING
Maes Average
I like it 83% 58%
Credible 92% 51%
Original 89% 61%
Informative 94% 55%
Inciting 71% 45%
Fig u r e 8 .17 Consumer evaluation outdoor campaign
Figure 8.18 Recognition and attribution radio campaign
QUESTIONS
- Describe and assess the problem identification by Maes
and the resulting strategic communications approach
and creative idea. - Do you think the translation of objectives into media
solutions makes sense? Why or why not?
3. Assess the media mix and campaign components. Would
you have used a different approach with different media
and a different mix? Why or why not?
4. Assess the effectiveness of the campaign. Was it
successful? Why or why not?
Sources: Maes Effie case 2010; Bert Denis, TBWA Brussels.
References
(^1) Donnelly, W.J. (1996), Planning Media: Strategy and
Imagination. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
(^2) Donnelly, W.J. (1996), Planning Media: Strategy and
Imagination. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
(^3) Donnelly, W.J. (1996), Planning Media: Strategy and
Imagination. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
(^4) Nordhielm, C.L. (2002), ‘The Influence of Level of
Processing on Advertising Repetition Effects’, Journal of
Consumer Research, 29 (December), 371–82.
(^5) Pechman, C. and Stewart, D.W. (1989), ‘Advertising
Repetition: A Critical Review of Wearin and Wearout’,
Current Issues and Research in Advertising, 12, 285–330.
M08_PELS3221_05_SE_C08.indd 286 6/6/13 9:23 AM