Marketing Communications

(Ron) #1
References

1 Rossiter, J.R. and Percy, L. (1997), Advertising
Communications and Promotion Management. New York:
McGraw-Hill.
2 Pickton, D. and Broderick, A. (2005), Integrated Market-
ing Communications. Harlow: Financial Times/Prentice
Hall.
3 Ferrée, H. (1989), Groot Inspiratieboek voor Creatieve
Reclame ( Great Inspiration Book for Creative Advertising ).
Deventer: Kluwer Bedrijfswetenschappen.
4 Fill, C. (2002), Marketing Communications: Contexts,
Strategies and Applications. Harlow: Financial Times/
Prentice Hall.
5 van Raaij, F.W. (1989), ‘How Consumers React to
Advertising’, International Journal of Advertising , 8(3),
261–73.
6 See also: de Houwer, J. (2001), ‘A Structural and Process
Analysis of the Implicit Association Test’, Journal of
Experimental Social Psychology , 37, 443–51; Maison, D.
(2002), ‘Using the Implicit Association Test to Study
the Relation Between Consumers’ Implicit Attitudes
and Product Usage’, Asia Pacifi c Advances in Consumer
Research , 5, 650–54; Vantomme, D., Geuens, M., De
Pelsmacker, P. and De Houwer, J. (2006), ‘Explicit and
Implicit Determinants of Fair-trade Buying Behaviour’,
Advances in Consumer Research , 33, 699–703; Vantomme,
D., Geuens, M., De Houwer, J. and De Pelsmacker, P.
(2005), ‘Implicit Attitudes Toward Green Consumer
Behaviour’, Psychologica Belgica , 25(4), 217–239.
7 For an overview of physiological tests, see Poels, K. and
De Witte, S. (2006), ‘How to Capture the Heart? Reviewing
20 Years of Emotion Measurement in Advertising’, Journal
of Advertising Research , 46(1), 18–37.

8 MediaAnalyzer, ‘Attention Tracking and Emotion
Tracking, GRP – exploring media’, September 2008,
http://www.mediaanalyzer.com.
9 De Cock, B. and De Pelsmacker, P. (2001), ‘Emotions
Matter’, in ESOMAR, Excellence in International Research.
Amsterdam: ESOMAR, 63–88.
10 Aaker, D., Kumer, V. and Day, G. (2007), Marketing
Research. New York: Wiley.
11 Aaker, D., Kumer, V. and Day, G. (2007), Marketing
Research. New York: Wiley.
12 Zinkhan, G.M. and Gelb, B.D. (1986), ‘What Starch Scores
Predict’, Journal of Advertising Research , 26(4), 23–6.
13 Duncan, T. (2008), IMC: Using Advertising and Promotion
to Build Brands. Boston, MA: McGraw-Hill/Irwin.
14 De Pelsmacker, P. and Van Kenhove, P. (2005),
Marktonderzoek : Methoden en Toepassingen ( Market-
ing Research: Methods and Applications ). Amsterdam:
Pearson Education; Benelux Insites, (2002), http://www.insites.be ;
Stout, R. (1997), Web Sites Stats: Tracking Hits and
Analysing Traffi c. Berkeley, CA: McGraw-Hill.
15 Rossiter, J.R. and Percy, L. (1997), Advertising Com muni-
cations and Promotion Management. New York: McGraw-Hill.
16 Due to confi dentiality requirements, the country and
companies involved are not given.
17 Due to confi dentiality requirements, the names of the
bank and supermarket are not given.
18 For modelling approaches in advertising research, see
Leefl ang, P., Wittink, D., Wedel, M. and Naert, P. (2000),
Building Models for Marketing Decisions. Boston: Kluwer
Academic; Hanssens, D.M., Parsons, L.F. and Schultz,
R.L. (2001), Market Response Models: Econometric and
Time Series Analysis. Norwell, MA: Kluwer Academic.

37.4%, this means an increase in margin of €1.83 million.
Thus, 72% of the campaign cost was paid back by the end of
the campaign. More than half a million people in Belgium
played WFL in 2010, which is 22% of the 18–34 population,
and 40 000 more than in 2009.
In 2011, the WFL campaign received a Belgian Gold Effie
award.

QUESTIONS



  1. Given the context in which Win for Life was relaunched,
    and the situation in 2010, would you say the objectives
    of the two campaigns are relevant and legitimate and in
    line with consumer insights?

  2. Are the measurement of the results of the campaign
    consistent with the objectives? Why or why not?
    3. Were the objectives of the campaign ambitious and
    were their results impressive? In other words, did Win
    for Life deserve to receive an effectiveness award?
    4. The case does not give any information on campaign
    pre-testing. Design a series of relevant pre-tests for the
    two campaigns: what will you measure and how?
    5. Can you think of other relevant post-tests and campaign
    evaluation measures?
    6. What might be the next step for the National Lottery?
    A new communications approach, a new creative
    approach, new objectives and effectiveness measures?
    7. Imagine that you had to launch Win for Life in your own
    country. Would your communications strategy be differ-
    ent? Would you set your objectives and measure your
    results differently? Why or why not?


Sources : http://www.nationale-loterij.be (accessed 15 June 2012), information provided by Marc Frederix (Nationale Loterij), Win for Life Effie case.

316 CHAPTER 9 ADVERTISING RESEARCH

M09_PELS3221_05_SE_C09.indd 316M09_PELS3221_05_SE_C09.indd 316 6/6/13 9:21 AM6/6/13 9:21 AM

Free download pdf