The New York Times. April 04, 2020

(Brent) #1
THE NEW YORK TIMES, SATURDAY, APRIL 4, 2020 N A

Tracking an OutbreakTravel and Linguistics


NEW DELHI — Ana Pautler, a
trekker from San Francisco, was
partway up a Himalayan moun-
tain trail in Nepal when she no-
ticed something peculiar: People
were turning around.
As fears of the coronavirus
spread around the world, German
hikers told Ms. Pautler on March
17 that their embassy had advised
them to return to Kathmandu, the
capital, and was discussing flying
people out. Israeli tourists were
doing the same thing, she said,
spurred on by messages to leave.
But Ms. Pautler, 32, who has
been living in China, received no
such alert from the State Depart-
ment’s travel advisory system un-
til March 23, though she was
signed up for regular updates.
By that point, Nepal’s interna-
tional airspace had already been
closed for a day, following similar
shutdowns all over the world, and
her flight out had been canceled.
“Other embassies seemed to be
giving more information,” Ms.
Pautler said in a telephone inter-
view from Kathmandu, where she
is waiting out a nationwide lock-
down that will last until at least
mid-April. “The U.S. Embassy
wasn’t really saying anything.”
While the United States strug-
gles with surging cases of the co-
ronavirus and life-or-death deci-
sions in a fast imploding health
care system, citizens stranded
thousands of miles away fear that
they may be left behind.
A State Department spokesper-
son wrote in an email that person-
nel were “working tirelessly to
identify transportation options for
U.S. citizens seeking to return to
the United States.” The State De-
partment did not answer a ques-
tion about why Americans in Ne-
pal were notified of complications
returning home later than other
nations.
As coronavirus cases reached
one million worldwide, Americans
on three continents said in inter-
views that government repatria-
tion efforts had seemed slower
and less certain than those of
other countries, pointing to em-
bassy social media posts and
emails through the STEP pro-
gram, which provides travel up-
dates to citizens abroad.
In India, American beachgoers
in Goa, where many shops have
closed from a 21-day lockdown,
said they were rationing food as
other countries loaded their citi-
zens onto buses bound for the air-
port.
In Ghana, Halima Mahdee, 40, a
student from California, said she
was furious about not having been
evacuated weeks ago, when South
Korean and Chinese students
were sent home from her study
abroad program in Accra, the cap-
ital.
In Peru, hundreds of Americans
are still trapped, and activists
warned that a humanitarian crisis
was unfolding as tourists reported
being forcibly evicted from hotels
and unable to find medicine for
critical health conditions.
Diane Gallina, 68, from Long Is-
land, was frantically worried
about her daughter, who she said
was holed up alone in a hotel in
Lima and feeling despondent.
“She told me the Canadians got
out,” she said through sobs. “How
come Canada can get their people
out?”
Some tourists pointed out that
communication had been far


smoother with the embassies
once it became clear that the
United States was also going into
lockdown mode. Parts of Europe,
for instance, were initially report-
ing higher cases of the coro-
navirus than the United States, a
possible reason for why they
urged citizens to leave Nepal days
earlier.
The extraordinary challenge of
evacuating Americans from far-
flung corners of the world at the
same time has overwhelmed dip-
lomats.
Last week, the United States
Embassy in Kathmandu started
posting regular updates on Face-
book and organizing buses and
flights to reach people in moun-
tain towns, including those near
Mount Everest base camp.
But even as those messages
were distributed among tourists,
senior officials in Washington
seemed unaware of the specifics.
Asked at a news briefing on
March 27 about the situation in
Nepal, particularly for Americans
stranded on trails leading to
Mount Everest, Ian Brownlee, the
State Department’s principal dep-
uty assistant secretary in the con-
sular affairs bureau, told a report-
er he would have to get back to
her.
Embassies have faced daunting
logistics coordinating with local
government officials who are fo-
cused on protecting their own citi-
zens. Even reaching tourists in
countries like Nepal has been
complicated: Some popular trails
are accessible only by chartering
tiny planes that hold a dozen peo-
ple.
At a Tuesday news briefing,
President Trump said the evacua-
tions were some of the “largest

and most complex” in American
history. He said the State Depart-
ment had rescued more than
25,000 Americans from more than
50 countries.
“Almost everybody’s out now,”
Mr. Trump said, referring to those
in Peru and Brazil.
But in Nepal, hundreds are still
stuck.
Alarm bells sounded more than
two weeks ago, when European
nations started contacting their
citizens.
On March 17, as stringent lock-
downs started rippling around the
world, the German Embassy
warned citizens of flight disrup-

tions on their Facebook page and
urged them to contact their air-
lines. Over the next week and a
half, Germany and France orga-
nized flights to take out hundreds
of people, including citizens of
Finland, Austria, Denmark and
Belgium.
As Europeans were receiving
early warnings to leave, John
Arns, 47, who lives in the San
Francisco Bay Area, tried to get
information about what the Amer-
ican government was doing. But
all he could find on the embassy’s
Facebook page was information
about proper hand-washing tech-
niques and Women’s History
Month.
“I am incredibly disappointed

with the embassy’s response,” he
said.
Some Americans stuck in Nepal
said they were being pointed out
and called “corona” when they
stepped outside of their hostels.
The perception among some
South Asians is that foreigners are
responsible for importing the vi-
rus; Nepal has just six confirmed
cases, including one person who
has recovered.
“The Nepalis here are afraid of
us,” said Stacy Kim, 58, from Santa
Cruz, Calif., who was stranded in a
remote town near the country’s
border with India. “When we try
to buy food they are scared we are
exposing them to the virus and try
to get us to go away.”
Even in Kathmandu, tourists
said they were worried about the
logistics of something as basic as
reaching the airport. The police
have threatened people on the
streets.
Raj Gyawali, who is part of a
government crisis committee
helping tourists during the lock-
down, said the Europeans — ex-
cept for the British — had been
highly proactive in getting their
citizens out.
“To speak frankly, they seemed
so organized,” he said.
And the Americans?
“I don’t know why they are de-
laying,” he said.
It was not until March 26 that
the State Department issued its
first notice about a possible evacu-
ation flight. Five days later, 302
Americans left Nepal for Wash-
ington.
In a video message, the ambas-
sador, Randy Berry, said the flight
was the result of “hundreds of
hours of coordination and cooper-
ation.”
At a Tuesday news briefing,
Secretary of State Mike Pompeo
urged Americans “to work your
way back here,” saying he could
not guarantee “the U.S. govern-
ment’s ability to arrange charter
flights indefinitely where com-
mercial options no longer exist.”
But as Americans have
watched medical personnel load
bodies onto refrigerated trucks
and the United States reports
more cases than anywhere else in
the world, some are having sec-
ond thoughts about trying to leave
on another evacuation flight.
Amy Sellmyer, 34, from Okla-
homa, who has worked in Nepal
and built a life there, felt she was
better off staying put.
“I’m not planning to go,” she
said.

Ana Pautler and Mike Dobie brought dinner back to their hotel in Kathmandu, where they have been waiting out a lockdown.


TOM VAN CAKENBERGHE FOR THE NEW YORK TIMES

STRANDED TOURISTS


Kai Schultz reported from New
Delhi, and Bhadra Sharma from
Kathmandu, Nepal. Lara Jakes
contributed reporting from Wash-
ington.


Americans Abroad Say They Were Left in the Lurch


By KAI SCHULTZ
and BHADRA SHARMA

Travelers waited for a charter flight coordinated by the U.S. Em-
bassy at La Aurora airport in Guatemala City on March 24.

MOISES CASTILLO/ASSOCIATED PRESS

Citizens of Scandinavian countries in Lima, Peru, prepared for a repatriation flight on Thursday.

SEBASTIAN CASTANEDA/REUTERS

A lack of guidance


and information from


the State Department.


Making sense of the coro-
navirus pandemic requires get-
ting up to speed on semantics as
much as epidemiology.
Government officials and
health care professionals toss off
mentions of mortality rates, flat-
tening the curve and lockdowns,
assuming that we know what they
mean. But the terms mean differ-
ent things from country to coun-
try, state to state, even city to city
and person to person.
Officials use the same phrases
about mass testing, caseloads and
deaths to describe very different
situations. That makes it hard to
give clear answers to vital ques-
tions: How bad are things? Where
are they headed?
People search for insight by
comparing their countries to
those that are further along in the
epidemic. But if the terms are mis-
leading or used in differing ways,
the comparisons are flawed. Also,
the statistics and vocabulary offer
a false sense of precision while in
reality, the information we have
shows only a fraction of what’s go-
ing on.
“The new cases or deaths each
day are given as exact numbers,
and we’re trained to take that at
face value,” said Mark N. Lurie, an
epidemiologist at Brown Univer-
sity’s School of Public Health.
“But those are far from exact,
they’re deeply flawed, and their
meaning varies from place to
place and from time period to time
period.”

‘Confirmed Cases’
The United States recently hit an
attention-getting milestone, pass-
ing China as the country with the
most reported infections. But
there is deep uncertainty about
whether there really are more
American cases, and about how
well the figures reflect reality.
Countries vary wildly in testing
for the virus and how they report
the numbers, and experts say
most infections are going unde-
tected. So the publicized national
tallies are rough, incomplete pic-
tures that may not be all that com-
parable.
And that’s if countries are forth-
coming about their data.
Officials in the United States
say that China, which has re-
ported more than 82,000 infec-
tions, has understated its epi-
demic. Until this week, the Chi-
nese government excluded those
patients who tested positive for
the virus but had no symptoms.
China also doesn’t say how
many tests it has conducted, and
doubts have been raised about
whether it has tested extensively
in Xinjiang, the province where it
holds hundreds of thousands of
Muslims in indoctrination camps.
Few countries have done ag-
gressive testing. And of course,
the more testing there is, the more
cases are found.
The Covid Tracking Project, run
by The Atlantic, has tried to com-
pile all the numbers in the United
States and reports more than 1.
million tests so far, over 3,600 per
million people.

‘Widespread Testing’
President Trump has boasted that
more people have been tested in
the United States than any other
country, though on a per-capita
basis, many developed countries
have done more.
But it matters not only how
many people are tested, but also
when, and who they are. Once
again, countries differ, shaping
what the numbers mean.
A few countries, like South Ko-
rea, Australia and Singapore, got
serious about mass testing early
on. They used the information to
do ambitious contact-tracing —
finding and testing those who had
recently been near infected peo-
ple, even if they had no symptoms.
That provided a pretty full pic-
ture of the outbreak while the
numbers were still manageable,
and made it possible to slow it
down.
Though it did not act on the
same scale as those countries,
Germany did more testing and
contact-tracing in the early going
than most of Europe.
But most nations with large
numbers of cases have done less
testing, waited longer to do it in
bulk, and made little attempt at
contact tracing. They find them-
selves playing catch-up with the
virus, ramping up testing after
their outbreaks had already
mushroomed.

‘Fatality Rates’
It has been stated time and again:
Italy and Spain have high mortal-
ity rates among coronavirus pa-
tients, Germany’s is low, and Chi-
na’s is somewhere between.
It may not be that simple.
Counting the dead is as flawed and
inconsistent as counting the in-
fected.
Recent reports say that mortu-

aries in Wuhan, China, where the
disease was first discovered, have
ordered thousands more urns
than usual, suggesting a much
higher death toll than the city’s of-
ficial count, 2,535.
The outbreaks in Wuhan, and
parts of Italy and Spain, over-
whelmed hospitals, forcing many
sick people to ride it out at home.
No one knows how many people
have recovered or died without
ever being tested.
Italy and France have reported
death tolls that generally included
only those who died in hospitals.
In Germany, even some of those
patients are excluded, because
post-mortem testing for the virus
is not standard in hospitals.
And if only the sickest patients
are tested, then the number of in-
fections will appear smaller and
the percentage who die will seem
higher.
Germany’s low apparent fatal-
ity rate — about 1 percent of those
infected — may stem partly from
its broader testing of those who
are healthy or who have mild to no
symptoms, and its narrower test-
ing of the dead.

‘The Peak’
Officials often talk about when the
epidemic peaks or plateaus —
when a country “flattens the
curve.” But they rarely specify, the
peak of what? And how can we be
sure we’re past it?
When an outbreak is growing
unchecked, more people become
infected and more die each day
than the day before. Italy went
from reporting a few hundred
newly detected infections per day
in early March to more than 6,
on March 21.
That acceleration cannot con-
tinue indefinitely, and more im-
portant, Italy has strengthened
social distancing, apparently
slowing transmission of the virus.
Since March 21, new confirmed in-
fections have varied between
about 4,000 and 6,000 daily. De-
spite the problems with the avail-
able figures, and the dangers of
drawing conclusions based on just
a few days, it seems clear after al-
most two weeks that Italy has
passed a turning point.
On a graph, the curve showing
the daily count of new cases has
gone from rising sharply to mov-
ing sideways — the curve has flat-
tened — and even begun to move
downward.
That is one corner being
turned: The rate of the spread of
the virus has slowed down. It
takes longer to turn another: the
rate of people dying. But that, too,
appears to have leveled off in Italy,
fluctuating around 800 a day in
the last week.
But even when those curves
flatten, the epidemic still has not
“peaked” by another crucial
measure: the number of active
cases. That figure continues to
rise until the number of patients
who either die or recover each day
is larger than the number of new
infections.
To ease the staggering load on
health care systems, the active
cases curve must also flatten and
then fall.

‘Lockdowns’
More than two billion people, in-
cluding most Americans, are liv-
ing under something usually
called a lockdown. But there is no
set definition of that word — or re-
lated terms like stay-at-home
mandates and social distancing —
so the details differ from place to
place.
The lockdowns have varying
exceptions for certain lines of
work, personal circumstances or
exercise. Some allow gatherings
of up to ten people, or five, or for-
bid groups of any size; some ex-
empt funerals, others do not.
The biggest differences may be
in enforcement. Some places, like
those in the United States with
lockdowns, mostly rely on people
to follow the rules without coer-
cion.
But Italy and others have de-
ployed soldiers to ensure compli-
ance, and French police have
fined hundreds of thousands of
people for violating restrictions.
China, in addition to using securi-
ty forces, mobilized an army of
volunteers, ratcheting up social
pressure to obey.
And on Wednesday, President
Rodrigo Duterte of the Philippines
threatened to have lockdown vio-
lators shot.
Italy’s experience shows the
looseness of the term. It has gone
through several phases of restric-
tions, applying them to more peo-
ple, making them stricter and in-
creasing enforcement.
A few weeks ago, a person could
travel around Italy for a valid
work or family reason. Now, peo-
ple are fined for nonessential
walking too far from their homes.
But each stage was widely
called by the same name: lock-
down.

VOCABULARY

Words From Pandemic


Cause Some Confusion


By RICHARD PÉREZ-PEÑA
Free download pdf