Barron\'s - April 6 2020

(Joyce) #1

L14 BARRON’S•Funds Quarterly April 6, 2020


ing the latest slide. Manager Scott


Moore of the Nuance Concentrated


Value fund (NCAVX) has a list of 250


companies with what he calls “lead-


ing business franchises” that he has


researched his entire career, modeling


how they have performed in past cri-


ses to see how resilient they are. “We


want traits of leaders, and one of


those is having an above-average bal-


ance sheet over time versus industry


peers,” he says. His fund fell 28%


over the 30 days ended March 16 and


has beaten 91% of its peers over the


past five years.


Having manageable debt is crucial


in the current environment, as many


companies levered up their balance


sheets in recent years to buy back


stock. Now that the U.S. will probably


enter a recession, that debt could be


difficult to repay. “There has never


been more leverage in companies in


the Russell 2000 Growth [small-cap


index],” says Craigh Cepukenas, man-


ager of Artisan Small Cap (ARTSX).


“If you look at the historical Russell


2000 Growth net debt to [cash flow


ratio] number, it’s approaching three


times. If you went back to January


2010, it was under one-time leverage.”


He also says that money-losing, profit-


less companies now make up a third


of the benchmark, and “that’s com-


pletely unprecedented.” His own fund


seeks the opposite—low-debt compa-


nies with consistent earnings growth.


It fell 33% for the month ended March


16 versus the Russell 2000 Growth’s


38% loss. Over the past decade, it has


beaten 97% of its peers.


Mixed-Asset Funds


Of course, winning by losing less dur-


ing such a terrible drawdown is still


too painful for most. What about


more-diversified portfolios? Vanguard


Balanced (VBINX) is a good bench-


mark—and investment in its own


right—to stress-test your portfolio, as


it’s indexed to a spliced benchmark of


60% stocks and 40% bonds. During


the 30 days that ended March 16, it fell


19%, besting 63% of its peers in Morn-


The Great Portfolio Stress Test:


What One Bad Day Can Tell You


In an exceptionally jarring month, it pays to take a look at how the funds you own have

performed, not just on the whole but also on particularly bad days. What to look out for.

Companies


that don’t


turn a profit


makeupa


third of the


benchmark.


“That’s


completely


unprece-


dented.”


Craigh Cepukenas

T


here have been few days in


Wall Street history to try


an investor’s patience like


March 16. The S&P 500


index fell 12%, its worst


day since1987, which fol-


lowed the almost-as-awful


9.5% decline on March 12. The mar-


ket, of course, has continued to regis-


ter several jarring one-day drops,


including more than 5% on March 18


and 4.3% on March 20. Investors are


getting stressed as their portfolios are


being put to the test.


There is a valuable lesson here: Now


you know how your portfolio holds up


during periods of market volatility.


Turning this lesson into an analy-


sis is a worthwhile exercise: Investors


can examine how each mutual and


exchange-traded fund in a portfolio


functions on days with such extreme


drops, versus their long-term perfor-


mance. Granted, recently almost


nothing has done well, but some


funds have played defense better than


others. And of course, one day’s re-


turn still shouldn’t trump a long-term


record. CGM Focus (ticker: CGMFX),


for instance, cut the market’s loss on


March 16 almost in half, falling 6.6%,


thanks to its short positions (bets


against individual stocks),but it has


terrible long-term numbers because of


its manager’s aggressive style.


More interesting are funds like


AMG Yacktman Focused (YAFFX),


which fell 8.9% on March 16 but has


beaten 84% of its peers in Morning-


star’s Large Value category over the


past 10 years with an 8.1% annualized


return. In theory, value stocks, which


are cheaper than growth, are sup-


posed to offer more downside protec-


tion, having less room to fall. But that


hasn’t been the case in both this bear


market and the 2008 one, as cheap


stocks are often of weaker, more cycli-


cal companies vulnerable to down-


turns. In the 30 days that ended on


March 16, the iShares Core S&P


500 (IVV) lost 29%; the iShares


Russell 1000 Value (IWD), 32%;


and iShares Russell 1000 Growth


(IWF), 28%.


Yacktman Focused has lost 26%


instead of 32% during that 30-day


period, though valuation-conscious


manager Stephen Yacktman also


seeks high-quality companies with


strong businesses and balance sheets.


You can find a similar pattern at


many funds that outperformed dur-


By LEWIS BRAHAM ingstar’s Allocation—50% to 70% Eq-


uity category. Over the past decade, it


has outperformed 90% of them.


Wells Fargo Index Asset Alloca-


tion (SFAAX), which adjusts its ex-


posure to stocks and bonds tactically,


has proved its worth versus this


benchmark, losing less than 16% in


the March 16 period and beating 97%


of its peers in the past decade, includ-


ing Vanguard Balanced. For more


conservative investors, Vanguard


Wellesley Income (VWINX) has


played superb defense, besting 88%


of its Allocation—30% to 50% Equity


fund category peers over the same


span, with a 12% loss, and outper-


forming 95% of them over the past


decade.


Fixed-Income Funds


For bonds, the iShares Core U.S.
Aggregate Bond ETF (AGG) is good

at playing defense. It beat 85% of its


peers in the 30-day period ended on


March 16, with a 1.3% return—thanks


to a hefty 43% weighting in high-


quality Treasury bonds. But it isn’t


great at playing offense, beating 62%


of peers in the past decade with a


3.8% annualized return.


A perhaps better, albeit riskier,


alternative might be Metropolitan


West Total Return Bond


(MWTRX). It held up during the


March period, gaining 0.3%, while its


4.6% 10-year return beats the AGG


ETF and 88% of its peers.


If you want less stress in your life,


two metrics worthy of your attention


are downside capture and standard


deviation. Downside capture mea-


sures how much of the benchmark’s


fall a fund has “captured.” For in-


stance, the downside capture ratio for


AMG Yacktman Focused over the


past 10 years is 74, indicating that it


has lost only 74% of whatever the


S&P 500 did on down market days


during that period. Meanwhile, it has


a 75% upside on up days. You want


that upside to be greater than the


down—and if you’re risk averse, you


want the down to be less than 100%


of the market’s moves. The average


Large Value fund peer was down


107% and up 92%—not good.


By contrast, standard deviation is a


volatility measure. Yacktman has an


11% 10-year standard deviation ver-


sus the market’s 14%. Though such


statistics may not feel useful while


you’re licking your current wounds,


knowing them could help soften the


blow of the next crash.B Alex Robbins

Free download pdf