Wednesday4 March 2020 ★ FINANCIAL TIMES 7
F T B I G R E A D. UK POLITICS
Quintessentially sells itself as a personal assistant to the 0.1 per cent with impeccable political and royal
contacts. But the London-based luxury service has faced accusations of financial mismanagement.
By Tabby Kinder and Dan Thomas
ing company before the recent reorgani-
sation — recorded a £3.1m loss in the lat-
est available accounts and a £1.8m fall
in revenue to £23.1m in the 12 months to
May 2018. It blamed the drop in revenue
on pulled corporate contracts and bad
debts related to a customer that went
bust. In 2017, the company made a loss
of £2.8m, after a £359,000 profit the
previous year.
Masculine bravado
The pressures on the business have
made its headquarters near London’s
Regent’s Park a sometimes turbulent
place, according to several former
employees. They have criticised the
company’s leadership in interviews
with the FT, citing a high turnover of
staff, dissatisfaction over levels of pay
and tirades by some of its directors.
In a typo-strewn email sent by Mr
Simpson in 2018 to the heads of Quintes-
sentially’s subsidiaries, cited in the claim
brought by Ms Fielding and Ms Villami-
zar-Duque, he wrote: “Anyone whop
questions any decisions I am not making
and doesn’t act on what I am saying is
immediately fired for gross miscon-
duct.” He added: “I amnot FIGHTING
OVER ANY OF THIS. Youlisten to what I
say and you act on it for the greater good
of all in this company. I don’t wasn’t any
decision queries. I will be responsible for
any mistakes I make, no you. Reply that
I have full agreement and that you
understand what I am saying.”
“There was so much masculine bra-
vado at the top of the organisation,” one
former staff member recalls. A separate
former executive, who reported directly
to the founders, says: “The place felt
MadMen-esque, it was old school.”
A third former employee adds: “Some
of us found it ard to square theh [image
of] charismatic, charitable Ben with the
man who shouted in the office and
reduced some younger staff to tears.”
ButAnnastasia Seebohm, who was
appointed in 2018 to run the company,
disputes this. “The culture here is so far
from macho,” she says, citing her own
rapid rise from he group’s Athens officet
to global chief executive in under eight
years while in her early 30s. She points
to the fact that 70 per cent of the group’s
senior executive team are women.
“Some employees when they leave are
disgruntled but we have a wonderful
network of former employees that
remain very close to the business and a
happy team,” Ms Seebohm adds.
Mr Elliot’s status in UK politics has
continued to rise since the general elec-
tion. He was lauded within the party for
raising funds for the campaign.Senior
executives at Quintessentiallyinsist
that Mr Elliot as no problem inh manag-
ing hispublic and private sector roles.
The company says its next financial
results are likely to show a very different
picture. Its first global consolidated
accounts will be filed before the end of
March. Preliminary results showed an 8
per cent growth in revenues to about
£80m, the company says, with earnings
of £3m before interest, tax, deprecia-
tion and amortisation. Insiders say rela-
tionships with big name clients, such as
Facebook and Gucci, are growing.
“It’s clear that we are in great shape,”
says Mr Simpson.
A
n invitation to an event at
No 10 Downing Street? Not
a problem. A place at one of
England’s most prestigious
schools? Consider it done.
The chance to mingle with Prince Harry
at a Coldplay concert? Leave it to us.
These are the sorts of services that
Quintessentially, a London-based
luxury concierge ervice, claims to haves
arranged for its well-heeled clients.
Boasting powerful connections across
British society, the company has
marketed itself for two decades as a
personal assistant to the 0.1 per cent.
At the centre of the operation is the
company’s co-founder,Ben Elliot, a 44-
year-old Etonian who moves effortlessly
across a social circle that mixes the royal
family, the Conservative party and the
City of London.
The nephew of Camilla, the Duchess
of Cornwall, he is frequently photo-
graphed with her husband, Prince
Charles, the future king. Mr Elliot is also
a friend of influential politicians includ-
ing Prime MinisterBoris Johnson.
That sort of access dovetails with the
sales pitch from Quintessentially. The
company advertises that it has secured
clients a private dinner at Buckingham
Palace hosted by Mr Elliot and invita-
tions to events where customers might
rub shoulders with olitical figures.p
P r i n c e C h a r l e s i s q u o t e d i n a
promotional videofor Quintessentially,
praising its services.
Mr Elliot’s networking skills have
proved to be useful. Last July, he was
madeco-chair of the Conservative party
where hislist of contacts helped raise
funds for Mr Johnson’s triumphant
election campaign in December.
He also has a growing presence in
Whitehall. Mr Elliot was appointed in
January 2019 as the government’s first
“food waste tsar”, an unpaid role, to
raise awareness about the issue. Quin-
tessentially has signed up theDepart-
ment for International Trade as a client
of its door-opening services.
But behind Mr Elliot’s high-profile
web of relationships and society image,
his company has confronted difficult
questions.
Quintessentially — which recorded
losses in its last two sets of results — has
faced allegations of financial misman-
agement and has been accused of a
macho,MadMen-style working culture.
Late last year Quintessentially paid
millions of pounds to settle a lawsuit
brought by two of its senior female exec-
utives, the Financial Times can reveal.
The claim contained criticism of the
management style of Mr Elliot and the
company’s other two co-founders,
Aaron Simpson nda Paul Drummond.
The High Court petition, seen by the
FT, contained accusations that Mr
Elliot, who once described himself as a
“relentless, bossy fucker”, and his co-
founders created a hostile environment
for the two women.
The lawsuit cited an independent
report from 2018 by accountants Albert
Goodman, alleging serious problems in
the way the company was run. Quintes-
sentially’s structure was “opaque and
complex”, the report said, and it
claimed that the group’s directors took
“substantial” management fees and
estate agency and a chauffeur service.
From its roots reserving top restau-
rants and booking theatre tickets for
individual members, the company has
tried to branch out — signing up corpo-
rate clients and opening its contacts
book for the British government.
Since 2016, the department for inter-
national trade has paid Quintessentially
£1.4m to introduce officials to high-net
worth individuals so they can “network
at the highest levels”, according to a con-
tract seen by the FT. Quintessentially
arranges “exceptional visits” for civil
servants to meet high-net worth indi-
viduals and convince them to invest in
the UK, according to the contract.
Quintessentially has also looked to
corporate customers to fuel growth. One
former senior employee says the major-
ity of the 160,000 customers the
company claims to have came through
corporate contracts. Quintessentially
has disputed this but declined to
provide the breakdown of members.
Several people close to the business
say a model tailored to individual needs
sometimes suffered when applied on a
larger scale.
HSBC, which offered Quintessen-
tially’s services to its wealthy Jade
account holders, andBritish Airways,
which partnered with the company to
promote its services in the first class
lounge at Heathrow airport, did not
renew their contracts in 2018. HSBC
said it had reviewed its Quintessentially
relationship and decided to move to a
different provider after just 12 months.
Quintessentially says the BA and
HSBC contracts were not renewed for
“specific business reasons... unrelated
to customer service or feedback”, point-
ing to a redesign of the airport facilities
and a shift in strategy at the bank.
Other members have expressed dis-
appointment. A publicist from Chicago
told the FT she was offered three tiers of
membership that started at $8,500 a
year and rose to $40,000 for “Quintes-
sence” — a 13-month invite-only sub-
scription that included dinner at Buck-
ingham Palace, VIP packages to the Sun-
dance and Cannes film festivals, and a
tennis tournament withRichard Bran-
son n hiso private Caribbean island.
She signed up for its “bespoke elite”
membership, which cost $21,000 per
year. It promised 24-hour global access
to a personal “lifestyle manager” who
would organise “travel, VIP event
access, exclusive dinners, top hotel
access, hard to get restaurant reserva-
tions” and more, according to emails
seen by the Financial Times. But the
publicist did not feel it was value for
money. “They promised anything, but
.. I ended up paying for one restau-.
rant reservation and a PDF guide to
London telling me to shop at Harrods.”
Quintessentially says it has an 88 per
cent renewal rate for customers, and
that its internal monitoring system for
member satisfaction shows a “net pro-
moter score of nine out of 10”. It pro-
vided the names of three customers who
were willing to share positive experi-
ences about the company.
One of them, a well-known City busi-
nesswoman who did not want to be
named, says she knew Mr Elliot before
becoming a client and now pays
“hundreds of pounds” a month as a
retainer for Quintessentially services.
The company had helped her find a
house and move her family from Scot-
land to London, as well as finding hotel
rooms and a tutor for her child. “They
got everything set up, got us a discount
and even stocked the fridge,” she says.
Complicated empire
Quintessentially prides itself on an
ability to plan meticulously extravagant
events — it claims to have helped a Saudi
member host a party for 300 guests at
the Pyramids in Egypt.
But several insiders say it has strug-
gled to manage its own complicated
empireof subsidiary businesses.
In 2015, according to several people
familiar with the situation, Quintessen-
tially talked toWPP bout selling itselfa
to the advertising group. A person close
to WPP says the potential deal was
called off at an early stage: “It was [like]
a rabbit warren.”
In 2018 the founders launched a
restructuringto consolidate dozens of
subsidiaries under group control. This
meant rolling about 30 of its subsidiar-
ies, whose management teams held sig-
nificant equity interests, into the group
company, Quintessentially UK.
The legal claim brought against Quin-
tessentially last year was linked to that
restructuring. The petition was issued
by Anabel Fielding and Caroline
Villamizar-Duque, co-founders of Quin-
tessentially Media, an events business
that has organised parties for he Princet
of Wales and Facebook. The two women
argued the shake-up unfairly devalued
their stakes in the company.
The claim also alleged that Mr Elliot
and his two co-founders supervised the
movement of money between UK and
overseas subsidiaries in a eries of loans,s
share transactions and dividends to
help fund the group. At one stage, cash
flow difficulties left the group unable to
pay its staff, the claim alleged.
“Due to a large payment, Q group has
insufficient funds to make payroll this
month (which would obviously [be]
negative for the Quintessentially
brand),” Mr Drummond said in an
email to Ms Fielding and Ms Villamizar-
Duque in November 2018, in which he
requested their events business provide
funds to support the group, according to
their claim. It also said a dividend paid
to the founders from Quintessentially
Events “took the company very sub-
stantially into a deficit” of £602,000 in
- Citing the accountants’ report, the
claim said that the dividend “could be
deemed to be illegal”.
The company disputes all of the alle-
gations contained in the claim and says
the matter has been “fully resolved”. It
adds: “Any suggestion that the directors
of Quintessentially UK have breached
their fiduciary duties and/or they have
failed to act in the best interests of the
company are vehemently denied.”
Quintessentially settled the claim out
of court. The resulting restructuring of
the group left two charges over its assets
that gave Ms Fielding and Ms Villami-
zar-Duque rights to equity in the group,
according to people briefed on the
matter and filings at Companies House.
Quintessentially UK Ltd — the hold-
“aggressive” ividends from the operat-d
ing companies.
The result of the payments had alleg-
edly been to make Quintessentially’s
events business “technically insolvent”,
according to the report.
The lawsuit also cited a recording of a
board meeting in February 2019 during
which Quintessentially’s directors dis-
cussed the possibility of reducing a cor-
poration tax payment, estimated to be
£260,000. According to the legal com-
plaint, Mr Elliot, who has cultivated the
government as a client, was alleged to
have said at the prospect of paying that
amount in tax: “We can’t give the fuck-
ing thing to the government.”
Quintessentially told the Financial
Times it “categorically denied” that Mr
Elliot made the statement and said it
was “simply untrue”. It denied all of the
allegations contained in the claim and
said the dispute had been “fully
resolved”. Mr Elliot declined to be inter-
viewed for this article.Mr Drummond
did not provide any comment.
The world of the wealthy
The secret to Quintessentially’s success,
Mr Elliot has said, is “knowing the right
people to contact, for the right favour”.
The company was born in 2000 in the
shadow of the royal family. After Eton
and Bristol University, Mr Elliot was
introduced to Mr Simpson, a former
film producer, and Mr Drummond, a
lawyer, through his cousin, Tom Parker-
Bowles, the Duchess of Cornwall’s son.
It offers clients “anything you want,
anytime you want it, anywhere you
want it”. The latest brochure advertises
“membership highlights” that have in
the past included “access to an intimate
charity event with Samantha Cameron
at 10 Downing Street”, referring to the
wife of the former prime minister, and
“a personal invitation to a fundraiser
hosted by HRH Prince of Wales at Wind-
sor Castle”.
Ever-grander ideas have been dreamt
up. In 2017, it said it was building a 220-
metre superyacht that would be the
“world’s largest floating private mem-
bers club for the global elite” — although
the yacht has yet to materialise.
“He’s a big personality and a big per-
son physically,” says someone who has
worked closely with Mr Elliot. “He’s an
impressive person to talk to and he’s
good with clients. His challenge was
managing people and working with
staff, he has an abrupt manner.”
Quintessentially made a loss of
£833,000 in its first year, but grew
rapidly to more than 1,000 staff and 30
subsidiary companies that have
included an art dealership, a florist, an
Quintessentially
founder Ben
Elliot, centre,
retained his role
as Conservative
party co-chair
aftertheelection
victory of Boris
Johnson, left.
Elliot also has
an unpaid
government role
advising on food
waste. He is a
nephew of the
Duchess of
Cornwall, whose
husband Princes
Charles, right, is
quoted in a
promotional
video for
Quintessentially
FT montage
‘They
promised
anything,
but I ended
up paying
for one
restaurant
reservation
and a PDF
guide to
London
telling me to
shop at
Harrods’
‘They got
everything
set up, got us
a discount
and even
stocked the
fridge’
The embattled concierge with elite ties
Prince Harry
on stage with
Coldplay during
the charity
concert at
Kensington
Palace in
2016, an event
which was
sponsored by
Quintessentially.
The chance to
mingle with
Prince Harry at a
concert by the
UK band is
typical of the
experiences
offered by the
company
MARCH 4 2020 Section:Features Time: 3/3/2020- 18:33 User:charlotte.middlehurst Page Name:BIG PAGE, Part,Page,Edition:USA, 7, 1