The Washington Post - 05.03.2020

(nextflipdebug5) #1

THURSDAy, MARCH 5 , 2020. THE WASHINGTON POST eZ re A25


“E


nlightened statesmen,”
wrote James Madison,
“will not always be at the
helm.” His genius ex-
tended to understatement, and until
Tuesday it was approaching probable
that by midnight of November’s first
Tuesday, sensible Americans would
be elated and distraught — elated
because someone grotesquely unsuit-
ed to the presidency would have been
denied that office, but distraught
because such a person had won it.
To gether, Bernie Sanders and Don-
ald Trump would constitute the most
repulsive presidential choice in U.S.
history. The Democratic Party, how-
ever, is not the world’s oldest party
because it fecklessly allows its presi-
dential nomination to be grasped by
someone who — let us plainly state
the most important fact about Sand-
ers — dislikes this nation.
Joe Biden has little to say that is
remarkable and he says it in a re-
markably meandering manner, but
grant his request: Don’t compare him
with the Almighty, compare him with
the alternative. The florid Sanders,
with his relentless, a rm-waving, high-
decibel depiction of America’s history
and present as a sordid story of
injustices, resembles the woman in
the Anthony Trollope novel who
scolded “frightfully, loudly, scornfully,
and worse than all, continually.” Hav-
ing called this country a “hellhole,”
President Trump’s first presidential
words lamented “American carnage.”
Michelangelo could see a statue in
a stone. Sanders and Trump, those
temperamental twins, see failure in a
republic that multitudes risk death to
reach. Whether Biden or Trump is
inaugurated next Jan. 20 depends on
whether Democratic primary voters
complete the task of using warm
patriotism and cold arithmetic to
extinguish Sanders’s fantasies.
Oliver Wendell Holmes, who noted
Theodore Roosevelt’s “strenuous
vagueness,” would have marveled at
Sanders’s pixie-dust calculations.
Trump’s congressional accomplices
will solemnly lecture that Sanders
portends fiscal recklessness, but a
nation snoozing through trillion-
d ollar deficits might shrug about
Sanders’s indifference to multi-
t rillion-dollar details about his agen-
da. “Yeah, but I won’t be here” was
Trump’s r esponse w hen someone p os-
sessing the patience of Job explained
to him the unsustainable trajectory of
entitlement programs. Sanders’s re-
sponse probably would be similarly
breezy were he informed that confis-
cating every dime of every billionaire
would not come close to paying for
his Tinkertoy approach to govern-
ment: Pull apart and reassemble
entire sectors of society (e.g., health
care’s one-sixth of the economy).
Gulliver in his travels met someone

like Sanders working on “a project for
extracting sunbeams out of cucum-
bers.”
If Sanders is not nominated, his
seething core supporters, for whom
indignation is as delicious as bacon
(or the vegan equivalent), will not use
their indoor voices or play nicely with
a nominee who won fewer delegates
than Sanders won before the conven-
tion. Sanders, who is nonjudgmental
about Cuba’s “different value system,”
has said — stay tuned — it is a high
moral imperative that the convention
jettison the rule that the nominee
must have a majority, not a plurality,
of delegates. A second convention
ballot would create a second conven-
tion by infusing 771 superdelegates —
elected officials and other party lead-
ers — into the process. Excluding
them from this year’s first ballot
advanced the century-old progressive
goal of reducing conventions to rati-
fying rather than deliberative bodies.
The convention will act on some-
thing made obvious by Sanders’s
most telling shellackings Tuesday, in
the swing states Virginia and North
Carolina: With Sanders atop every
ticket, down-ballot carnage probably
would engulf many state legislature
candidates in this census year —
before 2022, some state legislatures
will redraw congressional districts —
which would enable Republican-
c ontrolled legislatures to disadvan-
tage Democratic congressional candi-
dates for a decade.
After To m Steyer spent about $400
for each of his 61,048 South Carolina
votes, Mike Bloomberg’s approxi-
mately $500 million bought this pearl
beyond price: the affection of Ameri-
can Samoa. These redundant refuta-
tions of the theory that money can
make vanity candidacies viable
should calm those campaign “reform-
ers” whose superstition is that the
power of political money is such that
government should regulate it (and
by doing so stipulate the permissible
quantity of political speech it can
finance).
Sanders’s prodigious fundraising
can keep him campaigning but can-
not fend off the failure that certainly
awaits him now that Bloomberg, by
his withdrawal, has underscored
Democrats’ determination to let noth-
ing interfere with defeating Trump.
So, the country soon can turn to
considering this:
Biden has twice experienced an
agony that has become relatively rare
but until recently in the human story
was commonplace, that of a parent
burying a child. This might be related
to his approach to politics as an arena
of transactions, not of ever-
i mpending tragedies. Such emotional
maturity is a prerequisite for restor-
ing national equilibrium.
[email protected]

GEORGE F. WILL

Americans might be


saved from dismay


W


hen critics of President
Trump argue that he is a
threat to democracy, his sup-
porters tell us to relax. No o ne
is being exiled to Alaska or locked up for
criticizing the supreme leader. The
courts, Congress and the media all con-
tinue to function. Elections aren’t being
canceled.
All true, but it offers scant comfort
given the historical experience of how
other countries have lost their freedom.
There is seldom a moment of clarity, at
least not early on, when a dictator an-
nounces that democracy has been abol-
ished. Much more common is for aspiring
autocrats to chip away a t the foundations
of liberal democracy — judicial indepen-
dence, freedom of the press, minority
rights, an apolitical civil service and so on
— while maintaining its facade.
Unfortunately, this type of democratic
erosion is now the norm across the world.
The “Freedom in the World 2020” s urvey,
released Wednesday by Freedom House,
reports that 2019 saw the 14th year in a
row of political deterioration, with
64 countries experiencing a loss of liber-
ties, while only 37 experienced improve-
ments.
Some of the worst repression is occur-
ring in China as a result of what the
report rightly describes as “the Chinese
Communist Party’s ongoing campaign of
cultural annihilation in Xinjiang.” But
you expect repression from a communist
regime. What is truly disheartening is to
read that during the past year, “25 of the
world’s 41 established democracies expe-
rienced net losses” of freedom.
The worst offender is the world’s larg-
est democracy, India. The recent anti-
Muslim pogroms in New Delhi — which
killed 46 people and were carried out
with the connivance of senior police
officers — are sadly indicative of the
country’s illiberal direction under Prime
Minister Narendra Modi and his Hindu
nationalist party, the Bharatiya Janata
Party (BJP). As Freedom House notes:
“While India continues to earn a Free
rating and held successful elections last
spring, the BJP has distanced itself from
the country’s founding commitments to
pluralism and individual rights, without
which democracy cannot long survive.”
Less dramatic but nevertheless de-
pressing is the erosion of U.S. democracy.
Since 2009, the United States has fallen
eight points on Freedom House’s 100-
point scale. With a score of 86, we are now
ranked behind countries such as Greece,
Slovakia, Italy and Mauritius. Freedom
House points out some alarming trends
of late, which include “an ongoing de-
cline in fair and equal treatment of refu-
gees and asylum seekers,” Trump’s decla-
ration of “a national emergency in order
to redirect Defense Department funds to
the construction of a wall along the
southern border,” his attempt to “extract
a personal political favor from Ukrainian
president Volodymyr Zelensky,” and his
orders to “current and former officials to
defy a ll congressional subpoenas for doc-
ument and testimony about the matter.”
These are only a small part of Trump’s
efforts to undermine checks and balanc-
es, which include an ongoing purge of
officials deemed traitors to Trumpism,
blatant political interference with the
administration of justice, and frivolous
libel suits against The Post and the New
York Times intended to silence critics.
Similar erosion is occurring in one of
the United States’ closest allies, Israel,
where Prime Minister Benjamin Netan-
yahu has emerged from the latest elec-
tion on Monday in a strong position to
form a new government despite his in-
dictment on corruption charges. Free-
dom House notes that “Netanyahu has
taken increasingly drastic steps to main-
tain the loyalty of far-right groups, en-
trenching and expanding West Bank set-
tlements at the expense of the moribund
Palestinian peace process, banning for-
eign activists based on their opposition to
such policies, and enacting a discrimina-
tory law that reserved the right of self-
d etermination in Israel to the Jewish
people.”
There is a real danger that countries
such as India, the United States and Israel
may now be going down the same road
that Hungary and Poland have already
traveled. Under Prime Minister Viktor
Orban, Hungary has lost 20 points in the
“Freedom in the World” survey over the
past decade and become the first Europe-
an Union member to be classified as only
“Partly Free.” Under the Law and Justice
party, meanwhile, Poland’s f reedom score
has fallen nine points since 2015.
The good news is that, just as there is
nothing inevitable about democracy’s tri-
umph, so, too, there is nothing inevitable
about its demise. As Freedom House
notes: “The mass protests that emerged
or persisted in 2019 in every region of the
world are a reminder that the universal
yearning for equality, justice and free-
dom from oppression can never be extin-
guished.”
To prevent further erosion of free-
dom, it is imperative to remove anti-
democratic leaders from power. While
that requires a revolution in China, here
it only requires high voter turnout. The
United States, which has joined the
retreat from democratic ideals in the
past three years, can now take the lead in
renewing democracy by voting Trump
out of office. If we fail to seize this
opportunity, t he erosion o f our d emocra-
cy will only accelerate.
Twitter: @MaxBoot

MAX BOOT

Freedom


is declining —


including here


O


ne of the many things we learned
on Super Tuesday is this: The
perception that the Democratic
Party has lurched to the left is
greatly exaggerated.
The results of what amounted to a
nationwide primary were an endorse-
ment of gradualism over revolution, and
pragmatism above both of them.
This, more than anything else we’ve
seen lately, should scare President
Trump’s campaign.
And it obviously does, as evidenced by
the increasingly desperate and pathetic
efforts by Trump and his team to shill for
Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.), a democratic
socialist.
The president has been filling his
Twitter feed with laments that Sanders is
being mistreated and faux concerns that
the race is being rigged against him. No
doubt Russian bots are adding to the
chorus as well.
But then, what would you expect?
Trump is apparently so terrified of for-
mer vice president Joe Biden that he felt
compelled to commit an abuse of power
that led to his impeachment.
The campaign for the 2020 Democrat-
ic nomination has taken more than its
share of seemingly impossible turns, and
there may well be more to come. The
velocity with which expectations have
formed and then exploded has been
unlike anything in memory.
But at least for now, the party has
returned to its original theory of the case,
which is that the man who served as No. 2
during Barack Obama’s presidency is the
Democrats’ safest bet to bring an end to
Trump’s.
Exit polls indicated that, with only a
handful of exceptions, Democratic voters
in the 14 states that cast their ballots
Tuesday would prefer a president who
would return to Obama’s policies over
one who would chart a more liberal
direction.
Biden dominated among conservative
and moderate primary voters, which was
not exactly a surprise. But he also did
well among the large share who called
themselves somewhat liberal, especially
those who live in Southern states.
In the early going of this primary
season, Biden’s shaky performance
raised understandable doubts about his
capability as a candidate to carry the
party across the finish line. In debates
and on the stump, he often seemed to be
missing a step.
Biden finished miserably in Iowa and
New Hampshire, and ran a distant sec-
ond to Sanders in Nevada. It began to

appear that in a large field in which the
moderate vote would be split among a
handful of credible candidates, the Ver-
mont senator would win pluralities in
enough states to forge ahead in the race
for convention delegates.
That prospect horrified many who
believed that picking Sanders would
guarantee a second term for Trump,
possibly by a landslide. So on Tuesday,
voters across the Democratic coalition —
taking their lead from the African Ameri-
cans in South Carolina who lifted him to
a resounding victory three days before —
decided to hoist Biden on their own
shoulders.
It helped that much of the party
establishment, including several of
Biden’s former rivals who had left the
race, scrambled aboard his effort. This
was a show of collective purpose that
Republicans had been unable to muster
in 2016, when they were desperate to
stop Trump’s hostile takeover of their
party.
On Wednesday, former New York may-
or Mike Bloomberg, whose campaign of
financial shock-and-awe failed to do
either on Tuesday, gave up his own bid
and threw his backing (and presumably,
tens of millions of dollars to come) to
Biden.
The once-robust candidacy of
Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.), who
was humiliated when she placed third in
a state that has elected her twice, is also
near its end. There is no path forward for
her. The only question now is whether
Warren will endorse Sanders or Biden, or
decide that she will remain more rele-
vant if she doesn’t.
Sanders h as what he needs — i ntense-
ly loyal supporters and a seemingly
bottomless supply of contributions — to
continue in the race right up to the party
convention this summer in Milwaukee.
But the results so far do not back up his
claim that he can bring an army of new
voters with him and beyond to Novem-
ber.
On Tuesday, t he states that showed the
biggest primary turnout gains over 2016
— among them, Virginia, North Carolina
and Te xas — were all won by Biden.
(California, where Sanders is ahead, was
still counting ballots as I wrote this.)
Democrats should not fear what lies
ahead, even if it is a long and robust
battle between the only two people who
still have a shot. At the end of it, the
country will have a far clearer idea of
what the party stands for — and so will
the Democrats themselves.
[email protected]

KAREN TUMULTY

The Super Tuesday results


should scare Trump


H


arry S. Truman was a politician
whose career was coming to an
abrupt end. Three years earlier,
the former Missouri senator had
assumed the presidency after Franklin
Roosevelt’s death. Despite visionary
leadership that created the postwar
world in which we still live, Truman was
plagued by low approval ratings and
mocked unmercifully even by members
of his own party, who joined in chants of
“To err is Truman” and “We’re just mild
about Harry.”
When the embattled incumbent went
to bed on election night in the fall of
1948, national commentators were de-
claring that Republican New Yo rk
Gov. Thomas Dewey would be the next
president of the United States. And by
the time Truman awoke the next morn-
ing, the Chicago Daily Tribune was
blasting out the bold headline “Dewey
Defeats Truman.”
Except, of course, he didn’t.
In a matter of hours, the American
people disproved pretty much every-
thing commentators and pollsters had
been predicting for months. The political
world shifted suddenly on its axis, and no
one saw it coming.
Seventy-two years would pass before
another presidential candidate’s for-
tu nes would shift as abruptly as Tru-
man’s did in the 1948 presidential elec-
tion. And that vertiginous change just
happened over the past 72 hours.
Joe Biden’s Super Tuesday resurrec-
tion was even more surprising than
Donald Trump’s upset 2016 victory over
Hillary Clinton. That campaign’s final
10 days were so thrown into chaos by
then-FBI Director James B. Comey’s
letter telling Congress the Clinton email
probe had been reopened that an air of
uncertainty hung over election night.
But last week, there was no question
that Biden’s presidential run was dead in
the water. His campaign was out of
money; his political organization a joke;
his support among black voters collaps-
ing. The former vice president’s path to
victory was cluttered by a talented group
of moderate candidates trying to elbow
him aside, and he once again was being
mocked as a man running for president
since 1987 who had never won a single
primary contest. The echoes of past
gaffes and the fear of future failures hung
heavy over Biden’s campaign headquar-
ters.
And then South Carolina and Super
Tuesday happened. Suddenly, Biden was
invincible, rolling up stunning victories
in Te xas, Massachusetts and Maine and

routing all challengers in Virginia, Ala-
bama and Minnesota.
Super Tuesday brought even better
news for Democrats focused on remov-
ing Trump from the presidency, with
turnout skyrocketing in states such as
Virginia. By the end of Super Tuesday, t he
rising Biden vote count from a coalition
of suburban moderates, pragmatic white
liberals and black voters of all back-
grounds seemed to build a political wall
strong enough to block Trump’s reelec-
tion bid.
That assumes, of course, that Biden
will continue to improve on the cam-
paign trail. He has been plagued by
uneven debate performances this year,
and there’s that pattern of gaffes and
misstatements stretching back decades.
Add to those concerns the withering
criticism his campaign has received from
party insiders, most prominently
Rep. James E. Clyburn, the South Caroli-
na kingmaker whose endorsement may
have single-handedly turned the tide in
Biden’s favor.
But Biden’s brand may finally tran-
scend the occasional missteps. He is a
trusted and tested national political
figure known for his empathy, decency
and, above all, ability to come back from
the hardest blows. In a week, he proved
his declaration to the New York Times
editorial board — “I ain’t dead. I’m not
going to die” — to be nothing less than
political prophecy. Tuesday night’s re-
sults will only reinforce voters’ belief that
when he gets knocked down, Jean
Biden’s son climbs back to his feet,
brushes himself off and walks back into
the fight.
The question now facing Biden is
whether someone so accustomed to run-
ning presidential campaigns as an un-
derdog can thrive as a front-runner. After
all, he has already had and lost that role
once this cycle. How Biden handles this
latest challenge will determine whether
he can win key upcoming primary con-
tests in Mississippi, Michigan and Flori-
da. If he does, then Trump will soon be
forced to reckon with something he
clearly fears more than any special coun-
sel investigation or impeachment pro-
ceeding — a reelection campaign against
Joe Biden. Trump was so desperate to
avoid that matchup that he got himself
impeached. Now, the only person who
can stop it from happening this fall is
Biden himself. But if the past week
proved anything, it is that as with
Truman so many years ago, history’s
wind is finally at Joe Biden’s back.
[email protected]

JOE SCARBOROUGH

Joe Biden is back in business.


But can he hold his lead?


MelIna Mara/tHe WasHIngton Post
Democratic presidential candidate Joe Biden during a Super Tuesday
election-night party at Baldwin Hills Recreation Center in Los Angeles.

CHRISTINE EMBA

excerpted from washingtonpost.com/people/christine-emba

Jill Biden’s star turn
The most awe-inspiring event this Super
Tuesday wasn’t Joe Biden’s tidal wave of
wins. It w as Jill B iden’s b lock and tackle.
While Biden, Mister, was celebrating in
Los Angeles on Tuesday night, protesters
rushed the podium. M rs. Biden j umped to
interpose her body between her husband
and the first sign-waving vegan. With
lightning speed, she then swung around
and stiff-armed a second. Jill was then
joined by Symone D. Sanders, a senior
campaign adviser, who helped wrestle the
protester o ffstage.
Joe Biden looked on in alarm. After his
wife emerged from the scrum (“We’re
okay!” she said, patting him on the arm),
he went back to addressing his crowd.
In a way, the moment w as a microcosm
of the entire Democratic primary season:
energetic younger women protecting
fragile older men as the latter stand
around in an egocentric daze.
Jill, 68 to Joe’s 77, was only the most
physical manifestation of this phenome-
non. In the past few debates, a sharp and
sprightly Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-
Mass.) bodied (there’s no other word for
it) Mike Bloomberg to let Sen. Bernie
Sanders (I-Vt.) shine, sacrificing some of

her own likability in the p rocess. Sen. Amy
Klobuchar (D-Minn.) weaponized her
“Midwestern nice” a gainst Pete Buttigieg.
She then dropped out of the race to help
the party c oalesce around B iden.
Non-candidates did their part, too. It
was Reps. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez
(D-N.Y.) and Ilhan Omar (D-Minn.) who
endorsed Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) in
October after a heart attack (and ensuing
loss of confidence) threatened to take the
septuagenarian s enator o ut of the race.
This is a common s tate of affairs. For all
of our advances in gender equality, wom-
en are still expected to be the t eam players
who fade without complaint into the
background i n order for a man to seek the
light. Women are rarely thanked for their
contributions, but they are often pun-
ished for stepping out o f the role.
Jill Biden’s bodyguard transformation
embodied the doggedness and devotion
women are expected to show. The twist
was that the physicality of her assistance
made it too obvious to ignore. Once the
initial shock was past, the cheering began.
This time it was for Jill, too.
Like many others, I loved s eeing f emale
fortitude tumble into the spotlight. What
I’d love even more is to see a female
candidate finally get to stay t here.
Free download pdf