Financial Times Weekend 22-23Feb2020

(Dana P.) #1
6 ★ FT Weekend 22 February/23 February 2020

House Home


It has become the


soundtrack to
summer in Europe:

wheeled suitcases
being dragged

over cobbles


Why Londoners


are relaxed


about Airbnb


H


oliday lets in London are
rising at a rapid and
relentless pace. In the
past five years, the
number of listings on
Airbnb has increased nearly fivefold,
from about 14,000 in December 2014
to nearly 65,000 in December 2019,
according to AirDNA, which tracks
the short-term rental market.
Additional listings on HomeAway,
another short-term rental site, brings
the total to about 70,000 active
listings — the highest number
anywhere in the world. Nowhere else
comes close for sheer volume: New
York has about 40,000; Paris has
about 39,000.
Londoners are pretty relaxed about
it. Last year, a YouGov poll found that
43 per cent of residents thought short-
term letting was generally a good thing
for the city. Only 14 per cent thought it
was generally a bad thing. When it
came to the impact on the housing
market, people were less sanguine, but
still only one in three thought holiday
lets made property more expensive.
This makes London unusual. In
parts of Europe, residents concerned
about being pushed out are taking to
the streets. In cities such as
Barcelona and Florence, Airbnb
elicits a kind of visceral hatred.
I used Airbnb for the first time in
Florence about six years ago. The
night we arrived we went to a bar near
the Arno river, where, in a toilet
cubicle, I noticed that someone had
scratched “f*** Airbnb” into the door
with their keys.

The next day, I could see their
problem. I was woken by a low,
rumbling growl coming from the
street below. It has become the
soundtrack to summer in Europe’s
cultural capitals: wheeled suitcases
being dragged over cobbles. “The
Airbnb roar,” as my host called it.
The fact that Florence is overrun
with tourists — me among them — is
having a debilitating effect on the city.
According to the Florentine branch of
the Italian union of tenants, 1,000 local
residents are forced to leave the city
centre every year, either because they
are evicted by landlords looking to
cash in on short-term holiday lets or
because they are priced out as more
investors move in.
The case against Airbnb is two-fold:
it removes homes from the supply of
rental properties, which puts
inflationary pressure on prices, and it
increases the local economy’s reliance
on tourism — a seasonal sector offering
mostly low-paid employment.
So why is London not boiling over
with anti-Airbnb rage? Partly
because, despite its high headline
numbers, the UK capital is so much
bigger than most other European
cities. Even in those boroughs with
the highest concentration of holiday
lets, such as the City of Westminster
and Kensington and Chelsea, entire-
home listings only make up for
about 6.5 per cent of the housing
stock. In Prague’s Old Town, Deloitte
estimates that a quarter of homes are
listed on short-let websites. But it is
mostly because London does not

need Airbnb to kick-start a housing
crisis. It can manage that all by itself.
Central London has been hostile to
its own residents for years, as rising
prices have forced out all but the
wealthiest. Last year, a report by
consultancy ECA found that London
rents were the most expensive in
Europe — with the average cost of a
three-bedroom home in a prime area
a ridiculous £5,187 per month.
London also has a chronic shortage
of affordable homes, both for owner-
occupiers and renters. Since 2016,
supply in the private rental sector has
been decreasing — and by much more
than the increase in holiday lets.
Between August 2017 and August
2019, the number of whole-home
listings in London grew by about
10,000 to 50,300 — an all-time high,
according to AirDNA.
Meanwhile, the number of homes in
the private rental sector fell by nearly

71,000, from 1.035m in the year
2016-17, to 964,000 in the year 2018-19,
according to official data.
The drop in supply has been
blamed on the 3 per cent stamp duty
premium that was brought in on all
second homes in April 2016, and
the phased withdrawal of tax relief
for mortgaged landlords that began
in 2017. Whatever the reason, after
years of flat rental prices, the
average London rent started growing
again in 2019 — jumping 2.8 per cent
over the course of a single year,
according to Zoopla.
The rise of holiday lets has caused
many Londoners terrible stress, of
course. Most of us can rattle off one
of the usual horror stories: guests
rampaging through buildings,
throwing all-night parties and
generally degrading the last vestiges of
community spirit in a neighbourhood.
But Airbnb is not likely to make
Londoners irate. At least not before
they take on the countless other
indignities that renting in London
heaps on them: the nonsense admin
fees, the hidden charges, the
punishing cost of the rent, the
zero-deposit schemes that end up
costing you more in the long term.
Not to mention the lack of living
rooms, the mould, the mice and the
mildew. And certainly not while
holiday-letting sites make getting
away from London that little bit
more manageable.

Nathan Brooker is deputy editor of
House & Home

Onthe market


Nathan Brooker


B


uying in a Manhattan co-op
is one of New York’s more
nerve-racking property expe-
riences. Unlike modern condo
units, where buyers own the
apartment itself, residents in a co-op
own a share of the building and the right
to occupy their apartment. One result is
that prospective buyers must be vetted
by a resident-composed board.
“You have to disclose personal and
financial information at the co-op board
interview,” says Jonathan Gerst, 35, who
works in finance and bought in a co-op
on 79th Street in the Upper West Side in


  1. Many boards impose tough limits
    on the size of mortgages that residents
    can take, to ensure that they are finan-
    cially secure, he says; other restrictions
    cover anything from sub-rental to pet
    ownership. “It’s not for everyone.”
    Judging by recent price data, Gerst —
    who recently sold his apartment to
    move to the Connecticut suburbs —
    should be grateful he endured the
    board’s prying eyes. Analysis by Core
    shows that since Manhattan median
    prices peaked in 2016, those in the
    Upper West Side, where there is a high
    concentration of co-op buildings, have
    grown a further 4 per cent, to $1.148m.
    In downtown, the heart of the new con-
    do-building boom, median prices have
    fallen 10 per cent in that time to $1.55m.


In the Dakota building, one of the
most famous co-ops on the Upper
West Side — and the former home of
John Lennon and Yoko Ono, among
others — Brown Harris Stevens is sell-
ing a three-bedroom, park-facing
duplex for $6.75m. The apartment
carries a service charge of $8,950 a
month, and co-op requirements mean
mortgages cannot exceed 50 per cent
LTV. On West 72nd Street, Compass is
selling a four-bedroom co-op apart-
ment with a service charge of $3,400 a
month and maximum 75 per cent LTV
for $3.45m. The same agent is selling a
four-bedroom co-op apartment on
Riverside Drive for $5.25m, with a
service charge of $4,520 a month and
maximum 75 per cent LTV.
Widespread limits on the size of resi-
dents’ mortgages ensure there are few
forced sellers to drag down prices when
markets hit hard times. And most co-
ops bar investors, preventing owners
from letting their homes for more than

two out of every five years, excepting
rare cases such as owners having to
move for work or facing financial hard-
ship, says Brian Lewis, a local agent with
Compass. He has lived in the same co-op
on the Upper West Side since 2004 —
now he shares it with his husband and
the couple’s two daughters.

“We New Yorkers who happen to live
in co-ops love them during recessions
and uneasy times when they have pro-
tected and shielded us from yahoo
investors,” he says.
However, co-ops have plenty of
drawbacks, he notes. When prices are
rising, the building’s tight rules —

such as limiting LTV ratios — may
limit owners’ financial gains. And
many co-op sellers incur a “flip tax”, a
transfer fee levied by the building,
typically between 1 and 3 per cent.
Some co-ops also have a reputation
for being tired and poorly maintained
compared to the exacting standards of

new condo buildings. “In some cases
there is greater tolerance for these
imperfections because some co-op resi-
dents are more reluctant to renovate,”
says Lewis.
Critics claim the selection process can
allow discrimination. Ian Brandt, of
Manhattan lawyers Wagner, Berkow &
Brandt, is currently in court represent-
ing a seller of a Tribeca co-op apartment
in her seventies whose two prospective
buyers — “one Mexican-American, one
Russian-American” — were turned
down by her co-op board. Once he has
proved the buyers met the board’s
financial qualifications, the onus is on
the board to demonstrate they were not
rejected because of where they were
from, he says.
Arduous personal and financial
checks are one of several reasons that
Manhattan co-ops are a dying breed:
just six of 297 apartment buildings built
in Manhattan since 2010 have been co-
ops, according to Core. “Condos are

Perks of the park


US property| Prices are rising


for period co-op buildings in the


Upper West Side — but buyers


beware, there is an arduous


vetting process. ByHugo Cox


West
nd
Street

American Museum
of Natural History

West
th
Street

Lincoln Center

Central Park

Hudson River

Riverside
Drive

Columbus Circle

Columbus
Avenue

The Dakota

UPPER WEST SIDE

NEW YORK


mapsnews.com/©HERE  km

i/BU Y I N G G U I D E


Medianco-op sale prices in 2019 on
the Upper West Side increased 2 per cent
on 2018
The subway connects 79th St station with
Wall St station in 22 minutes
What you can buy for...
$500,000A studio apartment in a co-op
buildingon West 82nd Street
$1mA two-bedroom apartment in a co-op
buildingon West End Avenue
$5mA four-bedroom apartment in a co-
opon Riverside Drive
More at propertylistings.ft.com

(Left) Two-
bedroom
apartment next
to Central Park,
$3.495m,
through Brown
Harris Stevens;
(right) view of
New York from
this apartment

(Clockwise from
top) Central
Park; a three-
bedroom co-op,
Dakota building,
$6.75m; the
Dakota exteror
Alamy; Shutterstock/OSTILL
Franck Camhi

‘Co-ops are fighting hard


to stay relevant in this
golden age of the new

development condo’


much more popular with modern buy-
ers, thanks to the lack of restrictions
around mortgage borrowing, renting
and selling,” says Garrett Derderian of
Core, adding that condos also allow buy-
ers to purchase through a company.
“[Co-op] buildings are fighting hard to
stay relevant in this golden age of the
new development condo,” says Lewis.
Gerst concedes that co-ops need to up
their game. “Our building just did a gut
renovation of communal spaces for
example — not exactly ‘condo’ features
but everyone is trying to improve the
building,” he says. But he and his wife
welcomed the fussiness of the co-op
rules. “In Manhattan you don’t always
know your neighbours — they could be
anybody. To know that they have been
approved is comforting.”
Despite their drawbacks, the period
co-op buildings that line the wide ave-
nues of the Upper West Side are sure to
be among New York’s most appealing
homes for years to come.

Universal Images Group via Getty

FEBRUARY 22 2020 Section:Weekend Time: 19/2/2020 - 17: 58 User: rosalind.sykes Page Name: RES6, Part,Page,Edition: RES, 6, 1

Free download pdf