LATIMES.COM/OPINION A
OPINION
LETTERS
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The problem of lines at
voting centers did not sud-
denly materialize on elec-
tion day.
My daughter went three
different times to vote at
UCLA the day before the
election, and every time
there was a huge line in
which she did not have an
hour to wait. She checked
back on election day twice,
but by then wait times were
three hours.
So, she began the mad
race around Los Angeles to
find another vote center.
She went to two others,
which also had enormous
lines, before finally rolling
into the Proud Bird restau-
rant near LAX at 7:20 pm.
She waited there for two
hours to vote.
The thing that peeved
her most, however, was that
they ran out of stickers.
How is that possible?
So, in addition to not
having enough staff, voting
machines and vote centers,
even the “I voted” sticker
allocation was wrong.
Lisa Marlin
Los Angeles
::
On election day, I
brought in paperwork com-
plete with a QR code. After a
three-hour wait, I was
shocked that the poll
worker manually entered
my information all over
again on the single regis-
tration touch-screen com-
puter at the vote center.
There was no ability to scan
the code.
It is incomprehensible
that no delays were ex-
pected when the number of
polling places was de-
creased by 80%. This should
serve as a warning to those
who think medical care can
be completely revamped
and provided efficiently by
the government.
Thomas Einstein
Santa Monica
::
Election day voters have
some legitimate com-
plaints, but with 978 voting
centers open since Feb. 29
and a smaller number open
since Feb. 22, those stand-
ing in long lines should have
availed themselves of early
voting.
I stood in line in South
Pasadena for 40 minutes on
election day and promptly
went home and filled out an
application for permanent
absentee balloting.
I think Los Angeles
County Registrar-Recorder
Dean C. Logan and his staff
should be lauded for a good
first-time effort. I give high
marks to the new voting
machines.
Francis Cholko
South Pasadena
::
I’m surprised that nei-
ther your March 4 article on
the problems with L.A.
County’s new voting system
nor the letters to the editor
commenting on it mention
an easy solution: Use a
mail-in ballot, fill it out at
home with an ordinary pen,
put it in the envelope pro-
vided, and walk it in to any
voting center, bypassing all
the lines and machines.
I did this at Westwood
Charter Elementary School
— where waits were re-
ported to be up to four
hours — and it took less
than four minutes.
Barbara Ravitz
Los Angeles
::
It’s bizarre what we can
and can’t accomplish.
We can build an atomic
bomb under wartime condi-
tions, put a man on the
moon using 1969 computer
technology, and develop
GPS so precise that golfers
know how many yards they
have to the hole.
But we cannot develop a
voting system that’s reli-
able, avoids long lines and
can’t be broken into in spite
of numerous trial runs and
elections.
Joel Athey
Valley Village
::
In November 2018, the
Studio City church that was
my designated polling place
had, for the first time in my
43 years of voting in my
neighborhood, a long line.
So, I was astonished this
year to see the main Studio
City vote center had only
three people checking in
voters and only four or five
machines. How about a lot
more personnel and voting
machines in each center?
Ellen Butterfield
Studio City
::
Voting in person on
election day in Los Angeles?
Seriously?
Watch a Dodger game on
television. There are empty
stadium seats until the
fourth inning, and you can
see tail lights from cars
leaving the parking lot in the
seventh inning.
If you live in the dystopia
that is Los Angeles, you
must learn how to game the
system.
John Kelley
Costa Mesa
::
Recruit young people to
work at vote centers.
They’re naturals with elec-
tronic gear. Either pay them
or offer extra credit for any
course or acknowledgment
of community service.
They’ll keep the lines
moving.
Ruth Mehringer
Los Angeles
Perspective of
the poll workers
Re “What went wrong in
L.A.?” March 5
As a poll worker, I can say
your reports on long lines
and glitches were spot on.
My site experienced similar
issues, but we were not
overwhelmed and all voters
were finished by 8:30 p.m.
We did take extra time
explaining how to cast bal-
lots. We gathered that most
voters had not read the
instructions mailed to
them. A video should have
been on replay at each site
explaining the process.
We had problems with
names having spaces or
hyphens or no spaces, as
some voters did not know
how they had registered.
Voters appeared unaware
that many residents share
their name. Providing
a sample ballot or a driver‘s
license avoided these
problems.
The registrar needs to
adjust the number of work-
ers and machines at im-
pacted sites or add another
site nearby to handle the
load.
And, finally, no poll
worker at my site had a
second meal or even a
15-minute break during the
final six or seven hours of
voting.
Suzanne Brugman
La Habra
::
I’ve been volunteering as
a poll worker for 10 years.
Apparently, much of the
public was not aware of
early voting, although the
material mailed to them
advertised it. I worked four
days, and the first three
were very quiet. Most people
waited until the last day to
vote.
I was also quite flabber-
gasted to read that at one
site, the clerk didn’t inform
a voter to cast his ballot
back into the machine.
Poll workers were
trained to remind each
voter not to walk away with
their ballot.
My husband voted at my
center and found the new
system to be user friendly.
Having competent clerks
helps the process run
smoothly, as well as voters
doing their homework and
reading the materials be-
forehand.
Karin Gerber
Woodland Hills
Christina HouseLos Angeles Times
VOTERS WAITin line at the vote center at Manhattan Beach’s Marine Avenue Park on Super Tuesday.
Getting out of line
Re “Election day chaos sparks call for L.A. voting revisions,” March 6
I
attempted to vote six timeson Tuesday in Santa Monica but was unable to do so because
of long lines. Wait times ranged from an hour and a half to four hours. I have voted in Santa
Monica in the last four elections and have never had to wait longer than 20 minutes to cast
my ballot.
The new “vote anywhere” system in Los Angeles County was an absolute failure and re-
sulted in a dramatic decrease in polling locations on the busiest voting day of them all. This, com-
bined with opening up these centers as a free for all, effectively disenfranchised me and the many
other voters I saw leave the lines. I missed my first election in my 25 years of voting eligibility.
What happened across Los Angeles County needs to be investigated, and we need to return to
voting by precinct on Election Day this November. Voting in an election should not be this diffi-
cult, especially in a state like California that considers itself a progressive beacon for the rest of
the country.
Abdul Smith, Santa Monica
On May 5, 2003, Villa
Park resident Sergio C.
Stone compared SARS to
malaria:
“Nothing can better
document society’s lack of
proportion and perspective
than the present alarm
about SARS. Without min-
imizing its seriousness and
the threat it may pose to
human health, the near
panic and the economic
disruptions are completely
out of proportion to its
importance.
“Malaria infects millions
in Africa, India, Southeast
Asia and parts of South
America year after year,
devastating their peoples
and the local economies.
Three thousand children die
every day in Africa alone,
and the world does not even
notice.”
On May 7, 2003, William J.
Spelliscy of Orange called
for universal healthcare:
“America’s failure to
provide its citizens with a
national healthcare system
makes it possibly the most
vulnerable nation on Earth
to severe acute respiratory
syndrome or a future terror-
ist-induced epidemic.
“There is no one in Viet-
nam, Japan or Canada who
cannot go to a doctor be-
cause he or she cannot
afford it. In contrast, untold
millions, and rising, cannot
access a healthcare profes-
sional to have their feverish
condition diagnosed in the
U.S.”
On May 11, 2003, Cameron
Lee of Redondo Beach
criticized a university for
overreacting:
“UC Berkeley’s decision
to bar summer students
from certain Asian coun-
tries is misguided and hints
of racism. It claims the
decision is based on logisti-
cal deficiencies, but the
truth is that it was based
entirely on media-fed fear....
“This was a sledgeham-
mer solution to a scalpel
problem. Berkeley is sup-
posed to be an institution of
higher learning. “
On May 27, 2003, Barbara
Sommer of Los Angeles
suggested AIDS was a
bigger problem than
SARS:
“Why has the SARS
scare ‘taken over’ the world
health community — it is
looking to control and cure
the spread as quickly as
possible — while the HIV/
AIDS epidemic has been a
‘back burner’ issue from the
beginning, it seems? Con-
trolling the spread of HIV/
AIDS is as important as — if
not more than important
than — this new virus, in my
opinion.”
FROM THE ARCHIVES
When SARS was scary
A
mong our letter writers, the reaction to the nov-
el coronavirus and the disease it causes, COVID-19,
has mutated from the occasional dismissive com-
parison to the flu when the problem appeared mostly con-
fined to China, to alarm and outrage over the federal govern-
ment’s response to it.
The most recent disease outbreak to which COVID-19 is
being compared is the SARS scare of 2002-03, when thou-
sands of people, mostly in China near Hong Kong, became
sick with a flu-like illness that had a fatality rate near 10%.
Then, the reaction by our letters stayed mostly in the “we’re
blowing this out of proportion” stage, with some exceptions.
Here is what some readers said about SARS in 2003.
—Paul Thornton, letters editor
Vincent YuAssociated Press
HONG KONGresidents at a bus stop wear masks as
a precaution against SARS on April 14, 2003.
Numbers
and letters
A quick breakdown of the
mail we received from
readers this week
745
Usable letters to the
editor were received
between last Friday and
this Friday.
170
Letters were written
about the Democratic
presidential primary, the
week’s most-discussed
topic.
120
Readers mentioned the
coronavirus, the runner-
up topic.
78
Letters were written
about the new voting
system in Los Angeles
County.
HOW TO WRITE TO US
Please send letters to
[email protected]. For
submission guidelines, see
latimes.com/letters or call
1-800-LA TIMES, ext. 74511.
latimes.com/opinion
MOST POPULAR IN OPINION
Bernie Sanders isnt going to destroy the
Democratic Party. He just might save it.
Will the Supreme Court crown Trump as king?
Is Biden or Bernie more electable? We need
more swing state polling to answer that.
Early voting is a terrible idea and California’s
primary proves it.
ENTER THE FRAY
Visit latimes.com
/topic/enter-the-fray.
STAY CONNECTED
8 facebook.com/
latimesopinion
8 twitter.com/
latimesopinion
EXECUTIVECHAIRMANDr. Patrick Soon-Shiong
EXECUTIVEEDITORNorman Pearlstine
MANAGINGEDITOR
Scott Kraft
SENIORDEPUTYMANAGINGEDITOR
Kimi Yoshino
DEPUTYMANAGINGEDITORS
Sewell Chan, Shelby Grad, Shani O. Hilton,
Julia Turner
EXECUTIVESPORTSEDITOR
Christian Stone
ASSISTANTMANAGINGEDITORS
John Canalis, Len De Groot, Amy King,
Loree Matsui, Angel Rodriguez
Opinion
Nicholas Goldberg EDITOR OF THEEDITORIALPAGES
FOUNDED DECEMBER 4, 1881 Sue Horton OP-ED ANDSUNDAYOPINIONEDITOR